User talk:Mjmcghee

Welcome!

Hello, Mjmcghee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Luksuh 00:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability issues

Your articles will be deleted unless you can include the required evidence of notability in them. See wp:bio which explains that "A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." If your subjects are notable, you need to include references to those secondary sources. Please work on this. If you just remove the proposed deletion tags, it will be more work for both of us, but the articles will still be deleted unless you include in them the require references.

It also appears from your user name that you may be too close to the subjects and have a conflict of interest (see WP:COI). Dicklyon 05:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image is nice evidence of the invention, and would be great to have in the article, assuming you give the appropriate license. But it is not evidence of notability. Notability, for wikipedia purposes, is defined very simply, and just means that someone else (reliable and independent) has already written about him. If you can find a book or magazine to reference, that might do it. Otherwise, sorry, it's not going to fly. Dicklyon 06:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I am doing original research, and I come across patent information in the form of original patients (documents) issued by the United States Government and the Dominion of Canada and documentation of corporations in form of advertisements circa 1920’s doesn’t that constitute documented evidence. Mjmcghee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmcghee (talk • contribs)

I moved your misplaced comment back here to keep the discussion together; you can "sign" by putting four tildes at the end (it will expand into a standard linked and dated signature). As to the question, yes, that's good documented evidence of invention; but no, it is not the case that these patent documents and advertisements are evidence of notability according to the wikipedia policies. Did you read that page? What you've got fits nicely under WP:OR, which is specifically NOT what wikipedia wants. Dicklyon 07:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the course of doing original research I come across reference facts. Reference facts are things I find in dictionaries, encyclopedias, library of congress catalogs/indexes, and the United States Patent office. This is not original research since it is referenced material. This referenced material usually has corresponding numerical reference such as patent numbers, file numbers, etc. The referenced material is usually cross referenced by a numerical sequence and date. This means that anyone with the patent number and date of the patent can look it up – reference material is not original research. I have original copies of patents; this is the copy given to the original patent holder. I can cross-reference these copies with the US patent office and the Dominion of Canada (Canada) because they are numbered and dated. This tells me who invented something or anything and when they invented it. I can cross check this information with biographies and obituaries and find more information on the individual inventor. Biographies and obituaries are usually found in library and newspaper reference sections and are cross referenced by date of birth, date of death, and last name – this is all reference material and isn’t original research. The only thing that may be original is that this information has never been placed on the internet.

Saying that this is original research is like saying that because you looked up the word apple in the OED you are doing original research on agriculture. Mjmcghee

Yes, I understand. But your opinion and mine are not the governing policy on wikipedia. If you'll read and understand the referenced pages, you might be able to make a lasting contribution on wikipedia, instead of just being frustrated when all your work goes away, which is looking increasingly likely as you're not dealing with the issue. Dicklyon 19:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded some of the patent information and photos. Also there There are several public records referring to McGhee and an article in the Los Angeles Times about his son George L. McGhee dated March 17, 1942 front page above the fold in which he (James William McGhee) is referred to as an interior design specialist. The article is entitled 10,000 Navy Recruit since Pearl Harbor.

Thank you for your help with the bio on James William McGhee – it looks like its going to be deleted anyway.

I am a visually impaired person and I have attempted to upload as much of the supporting evidence as possible through my scanner reading machine, please tell me if the supporting documentation hasn’t arrived. For Paul Ashley Chase I uploaded an obit from Warner Brothers, For Maria Hart I provided three internet sources, a copy of a Los Angeles Times article and reference to Hollywood Reporter and Varity articles. For James W. McGhee I gave you 5 patent numbers and a reference to the Canadian patent office and reference to a LA Times article dated March 17, 1942. I also uploaded the original copies. For George L. McGhee I provided a copy of an e-mail from the 30,000 member professional organization he founded.

I am in a house with several dozen pin-in drapery hooks. I know there all over the world. Sort of like the light bulb. Don’t you think Wikipedia’s notability standards are a little high?Mjmcghee

License tagging for Image:Ring pat des.PDF

Thanks for uploading Image:Ring pat des.PDF. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your help with the bio on James William McGhee – it looks like its going to be deleted anyway.

I am a visually impaired person and I have attempted to upload as much of the supporting evidence as possible through my scanner reading machine, please tell me if the supporting documentation hasn’t arrived. For Paul Ashley Chase I uploaded an obit from Warner Brothers, For Maria Hart I provided three internet sources, a copy of a Los Angeles Times article and reference to Hollywood Reporter and Varity articles. For James W. McGhee I gave you 5 patent numbers and a reference to the Canadian patent office and reference to a LA Times article dated March 17, 1942. I also uploaded the original copies. For George L. McGhee I provided a copy of an e-mail from the 30,000 member professional organization he founded.

I am in a house with several dozen pin-in drapery hooks. I know there all over the world. Sort of like the light bulb. Don’t you think Wikipedia’s notability standards are a little high?Mjmcghee

AfD nomination of James William McGhee

An editor has nominated James William McGhee, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James William McGhee and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Thank you for your help with the bio on James William McGhee – it looks like its going to be deleted anyway.[reply]

I am a visually impaired person and I have attempted to upload as much of the supporting evidence as possible through my scanner reading machine, please tell me if the supporting documentation hasn’t arrived. For Paul Ashley Chase I uploaded an obit from Warner Brothers, For Maria Hart I provided three internet sources, a copy of a Los Angeles Times article and reference to Hollywood Reporter and Varity articles. For James W. McGhee I gave you 5 patent numbers and a reference to the Canadian patent office and reference to a LA Times article dated March 17, 1942. I also uploaded the original copies. For George L. McGhee I provided a copy of an e-mail from the 30,000 member professional organization he founded.

I am in a house with several dozen pin-in drapery hooks. I know there all over the world. Sort of like the light bulb. Don’t you think Wikipedia’s notability standards are a little high? Mjmcghee

Thank you for the reference to wp:bio I think James William McGhee fits the criteria nicely.

Good. Then if he satisfies "A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject," all you have to do is add references to those sources, and all is good. Dicklyon 14:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that in general James William McGhee has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record (found in the US and Canadian Patent Office) in his specific field (drapery hardware). Even some of the people that want this article deleted have admitted they have used his invention. James William McGhee was a creative professional that we can see through his patents originated a significantly new concept and technique for hanging draperies.Mjmcghee 05:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maria Hart

An editor has nominated Maria Hart, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James William McGhee and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MJ, there is no requirement that the evidence of notability be on-line. Just put references to sources about your subjects into the articles; that's the "evidence of notability" that we need to have in the article, and to make the information "verifiable". Dicklyon 04:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope everyone has had a chance to see the LA Times article I uploaded. I have trouble with the scanner, I am visually impaired and my scanner is used for reading and translating print to audible material.

Because I am visually impaired I can’t read all of the messages and rely on others to read things like tags, my assistant my have removed tags on articles I am attempting to source for you. This is all happening in the middle of finals so I don’t have the time to devote to these articles Mjmcghee

Thank you for your help with the bio on James William McGhee – it looks like its going to be deleted anyway.

I am a visually impaired person and I have attempted to upload as much of the supporting evidence as possible through my scanner reading machine, please tell me if the supporting documentation hasn’t arrived. For Paul Ashley Chase I uploaded an obit from Warner Brothers, For Maria Hart I provided three internet sources, a copy of a Los Angeles Times article and reference to Hollywood Reporter and Varity articles. For James W. McGhee I gave you 5 patent numbers and a reference to the Canadian patent office and reference to a LA Times article dated March 17, 1942. I also uploaded the original copies. For George L. McGhee I provided a copy of an e-mail from the 30,000 member professional organization he founded.

I am in a house with several dozen pin-in drapery hooks. I know there all over the world. Sort of like the light bulb. Don’t you think Wikipedia’s notability standards are a little high? Mjmcghee

Image copyright problem with Image:Maria_hart.PDF

Thanks for uploading Image:Maria_hart.PDF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ad

I don't see the ad, and you never wrote back to any of my emails. Do you check your email? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 21:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Obit_GLM.PDF

Thanks for uploading Image:Obit_GLM.PDF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Paul_Ashley_Chase_obit.PDF

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul_Ashley_Chase_obit.PDF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Copy of Scan10004.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Copy of Scan10004.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Punkmorten 20:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:George L. McGhee (1951)0001.JPG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:George L. McGhee (1951)0001.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:George L. McGhee (1951)0001.JPG is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:George L. McGhee (1951)0001.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:George L. McGhee (1993)0001.JPG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:George L. McGhee (1993)0001.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:George L. McGhee (1993)0001.JPG is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:George L. McGhee (1993)0001.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paul Ashley Chase

Paul Ashley Chase, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Paul Ashley Chase satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ashley Chase and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Paul Ashley Chase during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dicklyon 02:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links

In the case of the USA, links to San Bernardino should be changed to San Bernardino, California, San Bernardino County, California, San Bernardino Valley or San Bernardino Mountains as the case may be. Peter Horn 19:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paul Ashley Chase

I have nominated Paul Ashley Chase, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ashley Chase (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dicklyon (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

In the case of the USA, links to San Bernardino should be changed to San Bernardino, California, San Bernardino County, California, San Bernardino Valley or San Bernardino Mountains as the case may be. Peter Horn 20:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James William McGhee

I have nominated James William McGhee, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James William McGhee (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dicklyon (talk) 20:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nominations for deletion again

It's been a long time since I tried to get you to come up with some sources as evidence of notability for your family members. The movie star Maria Hart is sort of OK, as is the family therapist George L. McGhee, since they've at least been in a few newspaper articles; but the other two, mentioned above, have not one shred of evidence that anything was ever written about them in a newspaper, magazine, book, or other independent reliable source. Therefore, the articles should be removed, per WP:NOTE. Dicklyon (talk) 20:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:James W. McGhee.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:James W. McGhee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC) --Dicklyon (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:James W. McGhee.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:James W. McGhee.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:James W. McGhee.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:James W. McGhee.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:James W. McGhee.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:James W. McGhee.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of McGhee et al. v. Le Sage & Co., Inc.

I have nominated McGhee et al. v. Le Sage & Co., Inc., an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGhee et al. v. Le Sage & Co., Inc.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dicklyon (talk) 03:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]