Jump to content

User talk:Meno25/Archive 31

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 25Archive 29Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 35

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

15:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Multiple issues temlate in Arabic Wikipedia

Greetings my friend. I wonder whether Multiple issues template in Arabic Wikipedia has updated in the same way it was in the English to support templates instead of named parameters. Moreover, if the old style (named parameters) is still supported since the English Wikipedia discontinued this support. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 23:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: I am fine. Thank you. Unfortunately no, the template hasn't been updated. It is still using the old syntax. --Meno25 (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

15:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

مرحبا

مرحبا أخي محمد. هل يجوز منح علم المسترجع هنا من قبل إداري بالاعتماد على الخبرة في ويكيبيديات أخرى. ﻷني تقدمت بطلب ولكن قيل لي أنه يجب أن أمضي وقتا أكثر بسبب حاجز اللغة. أحب أن أعبر لك عن خالص تقديري حيث دهشت أنك وصلت إلى 10000 تعديل حتى هنا في ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية فلك كل احتراماتي وتقديري. بالمناسبة أخي محمد يمكنك مناداتي إم زي إن أحببت من باب تيسير التواصل. تحياتي--1339861mzb (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

@1339861mzb: مرحبا؛ أولا الرجاء الكتابة بالإنجليزية لأن الكتابة بلغة أخرى هنا غير مستحب؛ لو كانت لغتك الإنجليزية غير جيدة فيمكنك ترك رسالة في ويكيبيديا العربية بدلا من هنا؛ بالنسبة لطلبك فالمشكلة أن معايير الصلاحيات الإنجليزية أكثر تشددا من الويكيبيديات الأخرى، لذا فصلاحية مسترجع في ويكيبيديا أخرى قد لا تكفي لمنحك نفس الصلاحية هنا؛ ينبغي أن تقوم بعدد كبير من عمليات استرجاع التخريب هنا لمنحك الصلاحية؛ وكما أخبرك موسيك فيمكنك البدء في WP:CVU. --Meno25 (talk) 07:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Meno. I don't know that writing in any forighn language is fourbiden. Sorry if my language is not that good but i think you can understand what i am writing. Can you help me how to start from what "moseq" tell me about. I am fighting vandalism here but not as same as other wikis because here there are bots which fight some types of vandalism which is not found in other wikis. Regards my best friend and i want to tell you that i want to be the first in edits in arabic wiki and you are my highest example for success (i.e. qodoaty) . Thank you another time.--1339861mzb (talk) 08:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Another thing brother. Are you annoying from my edits in arabic wiki. Honestly brother i cant still standing while some articles are changed to some titles no one in arabic wourld has heard about it before even specialists! . The situation was unacceptable and i cant tolerate forcing some opinions according just one resourse and this is not acceptable according to wikipedia roles. Beleve me mohammad that i dont want to behave in such way but i was sending message that no one can force his opinion by force because the situation is continue in many articles in a way which is not ordinary and not normal and because i am the only one who stand aginst this thing according to my studies and lake of some editors who are interested i find myself the only one who must correct that falses so please dont be annoyed from me because your opinion is important for me. If you can but email here may i can contact you from some friends internet or from universty as now. Full regards brother and i am sorry for wasting your time.--1339861mzb (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@1339861mzb: Thank you for your kind words. You can join the Small Wiki Monitoring Team and fight vandalism on other wikis instead of English Wikipedia. After a few months, you can apply for Global rollback which will give you rollback rights on all wikis. You can also use CVN channels to monitor vandalism. Regarding your edits on arwiki, generally having people with different points of view contributing enriches the content and is better for the encyclopedia. However, you should know that you can't enforce your point of view all the time. Sometimes you have to reach a compromise with other editors. Anyway, you are a hard worker and I am happy with your work on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best in your life. --Meno25 (talk) 08:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
شكرا جزيلا أخي محمد. آسف سأكتب بالعربية كي أعبر عن رأيي. صدقني أنني أوفقك في كل ما تقول لكن بعد أن هدأت الأمور لا يعقل أن يعاد نقل بعض المقالات حتى بعد فرض الرأي في عدة مقالات غيرها على الأقل أن يبقى للطرف الآخر مقالات بوجهة نظره وليس كل المقالات من وجهة نظر طرف واحد أعني أنه فرض رأي طرف في عدة مقالات والآن حتى المقالات التي تعبر عن رأي الطرف الآخر يراد فرض الرأي فيها. هذا ما كنت أود منعه أي على الأقل الإبقاء على بعض المقالات التي تدعم الرأي الآخر. وهذه كل القصة ولا أريد إيجاع رأسك بالموضوع فهو لم يعد يهمني كثيرا خصوصا بعد وصول الرسالة للمجتمع. عذرا على الإزعاج مجددا وسأعمل على ما أرشدتني له حال فراغي فإدارة ويكي مصدر وويكاموس تأخذ وقتا ﻷن التخريب كثير وصفحات السياسات هناك شبه معدومة وعلى الاهتمام بكل ذلك عدا عن ويكيبيديا. أعتذر مجددا عن إزعاجك يا أخي. وأكرر أنه لو أردت الحديث معي بشكل خاص فدلني على إيميلك وقد نستطيع التواصل في بعض الأوقات. أكثر ما يهمني هو العلاقة الطيبة مع الجميع وأن لا يكون في مساهماتي إزعاج لمن أكن لهم كل الاحترام.--1339861mzb (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

15:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Support request with team editing experiment project

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

The Signpost: 29 April 2015