User talk:Manuchansu

Welcome!

Hello, Manuchansu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Hideki Tojo. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Partito Fascist Repubblicano

Ciao Manuchansu! If I remember well, I took them from the article of the Italian Social Movement, because I tried to improve a bit the article of the PFR. So I think that the sources are the one used for the article about the MSI. -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about sockpuppets?

I saw your question on my talk page, but I'm moving here to make sure you see my response. I looked at your recent activity on Wikipedia and it looks like you are concerned that someone is abusing WP:MULTIPLE accounts, which Wikipedia calls "sockpuppet" accounts. Is that what you wanted to ask me about? Binksternet (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Àngel Guimerà

Good afternoon. You may be interested in the following Wikipedia rules:

If you are editing in good faith, I ask that you respect the above rules and stop renaming the article again and again. We (and any other interested user) can continue the debate on the talk page, but the rules are quite clear that the long-standing name remains in place until such time as a consensus to move emerges. --Leptictidium (mt) 13:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Àngel Guimerà". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 August 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 16:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move war

I'm the Chaiperson at the Mediation Committee. I've rejected the request for mediation on Angel Guimera, but I warn you that if you move the page again rather than using the procedure set out at WP:RM#CM I will report you to ANI or an administrator for violation of policy and for slow-motion edit warring. I have no idea whatsoever about who is right and who is wrong here, but continuing to move and re-move is unacceptable. This is your only warning. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TransporterMan: Edit war waring ignored--90.174.3.75 (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Àngel Guimerà, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:32, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Smears

You have falsely implied that I am using an anonymous IP account to engage in sock-puppetry. A CheckUser procedure can clearly establish my innocence, but if you do not retract these false accusations, I will report you to an admin.--Leptictidium (mt) 12:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

False, Leptictidium. I said he (or she) is acting using your same argument on summaries (he is doing so, with the hint of the cross wiki). The IP is from Madrid, so it's hard to believe that it's you. Don't manipulate my words. Manuchansu (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]