User talk:Lexein/Archive 20
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lexein. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 |
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr K Ravvi Kumarr
Hello Lexein. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dr K Ravvi Kumarr".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr K Ravvi Kumarr}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- It has been deleted now, so I'm not sure who the original author was... Sorry for any inconvenience JMHamo (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lexein. I was wondering if you had the time/interest to collaborate on this article with me. I am acting in my usual COI role. I've been working on it top-down, but it's gotten to a point where it needs a lot of cleanup and re-structuring for me to keep going (the next section is a dedicated Clients section that needs to be removed entirely). I've submitted a bunch of edits and I'm afraid it's a little bit of a scary list to go through, but it's largely just cleaning out all the unsourced junk and whatnot. CorporateM (Talk) 02:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Archive.is debate
Hi, there is an ongoing discussion at the moment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive261#Archive.is headache. Maybe you are interested to join it. Thanks. — Ark25 (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lexein. A couple weeks ago I pinged you asking for help considering my Requested Edits on an article where I have a COI. I've been pinging quite a few folks, but as of today am still looking for someone to consider the last five remaining requests in a large set of items to cleanup unsourced or trivial info, etc. I was wondering if you had the time to take a look? CorporateM (Talk) 20:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
templates : RSS and Atom field restoration
cc: Quiddity, Lexein :
There was a proposal at Wikipedia talk:External links#Proposal to remove the RSS and Atom fields from infoboxes, that involves Infobox_podcast template (and 2 others) circa 15 May 2010. No discussion here or there. It went to archive 29 unclosed, and before any number of editors responded.
- "RSS" and "Atom" fields should be restored to the 3 infoboxes that use them, because:
- WP:ELOFFICIAL's principle of non-duplication does not hold for many cases where the RSS feed is not linked to by any page on the podcast website, the opposite case for video podcasts with many encodings conflicts with this (in this case such websites usually have an RSS list page).
- WP:ELNO#EL9 - "Links to any search results pages", RSS feeds are not dynamic searches
- WP:CITECONSENSUS and WP:CITEVAR - "Because templates can be contentious, editors should not add citation templates, or change an article with a consistent citation format to another, without gaining consensus"
Consensus was not obtained.
Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- WP:ELOFFICIAL's principle of non-duplication does not hold for many cases where the RSS feed is not linked to by any page on the podcast website, the opposite case for video podcasts with many encodings conflicts with this (in this case such websites usually have an RSS list page).
- "RSS" and "Atom" fields should be restored to the 3 infoboxes that use them, because:
Infobox photo discussion
Hi again. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better for the Infobox here? If you're not able to participate, just disregard this message; you don't have to message me. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Review aggregators
I know you have voiced strong opinions on this in the past and would like to alert you to the following discussion: Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Film#The_use_of_aggregators_on_articles_about_older_films. Betty Logan (talk) 01:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Lexein. I have taken User:Lexein/archive.today, your draft for Archive.is, to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 June 1#Archive.is, asking the community to restore the article. Cunard (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hm. I wouldn't hold my breath. In fact, due to the high admin emotions till swirling around unproven accusations regarding Archive.is, the boomerang effect is likely to have my stash deleted. I'll archive it elsewhere. Thanks for the heads up. --Lexein (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 June 1#Archive.is was closed as "recreation allowed", so hopefully the high admin emotions have died down. I took this to AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archive.is (2nd nomination) to allow for further discussion of the sources since a DRV participant wrote "Either relist or do not allow recreation". Cunard (talk) 03:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. We welcome you to have a look. Feel free to participate.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
- Publish an article to the journal.
- Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
- Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
- Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
- Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
- Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
- Join the editorial board.
- Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
- Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
- Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updates
wijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org. - Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach
wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.
-from Diptanshu.D (talk · contribs · count) and others of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.
DiptanshuTalk 10:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Lexein. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Over at Wikipedia:Scripts, you posted:
Wanted: a script to minimize/show the lefthand sidebar, and recover the space for the displayed article. "Minimizing" replaces the sidebar with a left-margin 4-em-wide blank gray bar. Mousing over the bar shows the full sidebar, mousing away from the sidebar hides it. This is similar to the Feedly app for browsers; show/hide only operates when the page is zoomed in (ctrl-+). Screengrabs @Imgur.com. --Lexein (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- See User:PleaseStand/Hide Vector sidebar. It uses ⇧ Shift+Alt+a as the toggle key to show/hide the sidebar. The Transhumanist 09:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! That's a win. How'd you happen across that/hunt that down? Lexein (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you
| File:Magritte TheSonOfMan.jpg | Thank you for reverting to my "True Color" image |
| Thank you for reverting to a reduced image size that is based on my original file.
I have invested a lot of work in quite a few Wikipedia images, making them "True Color", such that everyone with a calibrated monitor that conforms to the sRGB color profile can see the images in colors that best reflect what the images really look like and what the artist intended it to look like. On occasion, users like to upload new versions of the images, for whatever reasons they have for wanting to replace my uploaded versions, and by doing so they (inadvertently) destroy the results of my efforts. Shimon Yanowitz (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:COSIClogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:COSIClogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Lexein. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Given the report on AIV, and referring to WP:NOBAN, I can't help but revert your edit to Isingness's userpage. --Cahk (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC) But you didn't revert,isingness did, oh well, whatever.Lexein (talk) 07:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, Cahk did revert it - you can see it here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
I've been away a long time
And some procedural stuff has vanished from my memory. Oops, sorry.Lexein (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Lexein (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
When I look at [[en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Opencola_(company)] i see a complete reference section now, because I added it. What about that? You're just wrong to claim that I added the wrong template. Lexein (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Lexein (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
No personal attacks
Be warned, you are treading on dangerous ground with your personal attacks on User:Isingness. Firstly, you accused them of removing a References section from an article they nominated for deletion, which they clearly did not do. You labeled them "deletionist scum" when you, in fact, added a second References section (see below). You also accused them of "transparent fraud" and "disgusting behaviour" over it, over something they had not done. You then added a deletionist userbox to their user page with a disparaging edit summary. All of this is totally unacceptable, and you will be blocked if I see any more of it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, I've just realised that you did not, in fact, add a second References section - what you did was add the
{{References}}template which adds a notice saying "This article does not cite any sources." Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
What are you talking about? A References template adds a references section, not a notice. Look again. Lexein (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- just to be clear, I don't like deletionists one bit, and never have. LOOKING WITH THE chrome browser I can't see ANY evidence of a stated reason for deletion that you claim exists. WHERE IS IT? Lexein (talk) 21:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)