User talk:Legend

Thanks

Thanks for spotting and reverting the vandalism on my userpage. :) --soum (0_o) 19:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hogwarts

I don't see any reference in the Battle of Hogwarts section that there is indeed an attack by Voldemort and an army underway! That hardly seems like an excess detail. None of the details that are described make any sense unless the reader knows that Voldemort and an army have attacked. May I request that you discuss this change with me please. GiveItSomeThought 18:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voldemort himself has not attacked Hogwarts yet; he is still awaiting Snape in the Shrieking Shack. Also, there have been edit wars about the fact that the plot being overly detailed and that it should be condensed somewhat to cover the basic progression of events, and to avoid a potential edit war, I thought it prudent to remove it early. Legend ^Talk 18:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well, there's still no statement that's there's a battle going on at all! While the plot discussion may be too detailed, that is really too important a development not to mention. I'm going to take at look at the current version of the article, and see where to insert a reference that there's an attack by Voldemort's forces going on. Also, what's needed is really commentary about the plot, but if the plot is complex (which it is), it's not going to be easy to condense and still make sense. GiveItSomeThought 00:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

I removed uncited info that was initially removed by another editor, but was readded by an anon. - See History of the page Corpx 04:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you available for a 3rd Opinion?

Marty Goldberg and I are in two separate discussions at Talk:Branches_of_Wing_Chun. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.147.32 (talk) 07:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Legend. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Legend

Hello, Legend. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Legend, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]