User talk:LanaSimba

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Please let me know LanaSimba if I can help you in any way on the Psinkas article with the research. I know about level 2-3 Greek. I am sure it is not as good as you. I was trying to work on it earlier today. But I am always glad to help out when I can. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You WordSeventeen, I would appreciate your help a lot! And thanks for your support!

Expanding the Ilias Psinakis‎ article

Hi LanSimba,

You were right, when I typed in the Greek spelling of his name I get many more results. Plus one better I typed his greek spelling into the Greek google. One of the pages has many stories about him, and may have some information we could add to the article. Please look it over if you have some time. Plus the others I will list for you what I found.

http://www.newsbomb.gr/tags/tag/39861/hlias-psinakhshttp://www.newsbomb.gr/tags/tag/39861/hlias-psinakhs many stories

http://www.newsbomb.gr/ellada/news/story/493530/se-exelixi-oi-ereynes-gia-tin-kataggelia-psinaki---vrethike-exoterikos-skliros

http://www.iefimerida.gr/tag/%CE%B7%CE%BB%CE%AF%CE%B1%CF%82-%CF%88%CE%B9%CE%BD%CE%AC%CE%BA%CE%B7%CF%82 lots here also

http://www.aftodioikisi.gr/tag/dimos-marathona many

http://www.inewsgr.com/t/%CE%B7%CE%BB%CE%B9%CE%B1%CF%82-%CF%88%CE%B9%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B7%CF%82_ilias-psinakis.htm lots

I will kep looking plus try to comb through some of these articles to find some info for the article. Thanks for the barnstar! Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 01:33, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, WordSeventeen for the support and the search work you've done! There are really lots of articles, and if you could compile things from them, it will be great. When I wrote the article I took just the main info, which gives idea about the person and his activities. my best wishes! LanaSimba (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilias Psinakis. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read my message. I am really sorry for the mess..LanaSimba (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ilias Psinakis. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LanaSimba reported by User:Winkelvi (Result: ). Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking of templates and AfD discussions

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ilias Psinakis. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ilias Psinakis

Lana. The way to oppose the deletion is to add your argument for keeping in the AfD discussion. Please state why he is notable, and present reliable sources that confirm your argument. If the subject meets out notability criteria then other editors will likely agree that it should be kept. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 20:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Michig, I brought all the possible statements, links and references confirming the information, if some users or admins consider them unreliable or insufficient, I can't help, I just wonder why all the same informational sources are provided as references in other pages about Greek personalities and these are OK ... All this is very personal attitude to articles and authors and sources. Who will decide and how will determine criteria for pages existence? And how can do it people, knowing nothing about subject to decide, and to point their view publicly. .LanaSimba (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Ilias Psinakis

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:LanaSimba reported by User:Winkelvi (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

When your block has expired please ensure that you have read and comply with WP:CANVASS. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ilias Psinakis. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletions are inappropriate, I edited the page in accordance with current events, concerning the personality DIRECTLY, if you attentively read the facts and sources (one of which in English) you will understand that.

Your recent editing history at Ilias Psinakis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are once again risking a block for edit warring at this article just as you did last year. Is it truly worth it? You need to stop, and discuss on the Talk page. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 20:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

re Ilias Psinakis

I hope the article feels better and that I haven't changed the meaning anywhere. Thanks for the thanks. Do listen to seasoned editors especially admins: they really do know how the system works and always have our best interests in mind. Learn from them... Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) thank you for your involvement, edits and really respectful approach!! I appreciate a lot! I will follow your advice! Thanks once again!LS 14:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, LanaSimba. You have new messages at Talk:Ilias Psinakis.
Message added 22:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on WP:ANI. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Do not refer to a content dispute as vandalism. Read what is not vandalism. User:Winkelvi is sometimes a stubborn editor, but he is not a vandal, and it is disruptive to even suggest that he engages in vandalism. Shouting "Vandalism" to "win" a content dispute is a way to get blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Ilias Psinakis.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You've been warned by numerous editors previously about your tendentious editing and continual reversions back to fluff and unencyclopedic content at Ilias Psinakis. If you don't stop, you will likely be blocked from editing, possibly indefinitely. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]