Jump to content

User talk:LR.127

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article.


Copyvio tagging

[edit]

Hi, when you tag something for RD1, can you make sure you've checked off all of the revisions that contain the copied text? All of them have to go, not just the very first one in which they appear. -- asilvering (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, sorry! Thanks for responding so quickly to the revdel, though - let me know if there's anything else I can do (in general) to make the process of RD1 easier. Cheers. LR.127 (talk) 03:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just one more thing: if you leave the URL of the source (or description, if it's not online) in the edit summary when you remove the content, that can be helpful for future editors. (From the admin perspective, so long as the URL is in the revdel request template and all the revisions have been tagged, you've already done all you can to make the job easier.) -- asilvering (talk) 03:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

[edit]

Hey, LR.127, I see you accepted this at pending changes. The edit changed this BLP's caste, which is the reason this article was placed under pending changes. Valereee (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I swore I must have reverted the edit... thanks for catching it though :-). I'll double-check my other pending changes checks and will be more cautious in the future. Cheers. LR.127 (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't me who caught it, we had a request at WP:RFPP because pending changes protection wasn't solving a pretty important BLP vio problem at a little-watched BLP, and I wondered why the edits were still getting through. Valereee (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Sean Ludwick vs Ludwig

[edit]

A source was in fact provided 2603:7000:2103:79D0:FD9C:6459:FB77:2C26 (talk) 17:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm assuming you mean the request I declined at Redirects for Creation linked here. I saw that you entered your own IP as the source, and declined it as such. Sorry about that.
I recommend you resubmit the request and another reviewer can take another look shortly. Hope this helps. Cheers. LR.127 (talk) 19:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]