User talk:Kshitij85

Welcome!

Hello, Kshitij85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kshitij85, Well that's the point I've been trying to make regarding Air India. This moron Jasepl says Air India no longer flies to Bangalore, whereas there are two destinations out of Bangalore by Air India - Mumbai(AI 620/621) and Singapore(AI 444/445). Lemme tell u one thing, these are Air India flights n not Inidan Airlines flights as claimed by the user I mentioned above. One more thing all Indian Airlines flights from anywhere are marketed as Air India operated by Indian Airlines. So essentially, Indian Airline destinations are Air India IC code flight destinations, but these two flights - AI 621/620 & AI 444/445 are not operated by Indian Airlines. U can verify this in the Air India website itself. If a flight is operated by Indian Airlines (IC), then the code of the same flight will be AI 9***, for eg, IC 110 BLR-BOM is also AI 9110. It's very clear that these 2 flights - AI 621/620 & AI 444/445 are only AI flights. U can also verify the same at the BIA website: www.bengaluruairport.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek191288 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Zaid Hamid appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Air India, BLR

Hello Kshitij85, I see that you have added Delhi as a destination from Bengaluru by Air India operated using the A320's of Indian Airlines. Please do add a valuable reference to confirm the commencement of this flight from 31st of October. I could not find any reference to this sector on the Air India website. So I request you to add a reference beside the destination. Abhishek191288(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Go to Air India website, go to schedules and set the date to 31 October and see. (Kshitij85 (talk) 02:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Do you expect people who just read an article to do this. Valuable sources are always required when you make new additions to an article. I have provided a reference when I added Colombo to Kingfisher's destinations out of Bangalore. It would be appropriate if you too do the same, else your edit could be considered inappropriate. Thanx (Abhishek191288 (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

BTW, I checked what you asked me to. There is no mention of AI as a carrier in the following domestic routes: DEL-BLR, DEL-MAA, DEL-COK, DEL-HYD. Again do provide a valuable reference to your claim. Look at the following link. It is the schedule between BLR and BOM. It does show AI as a carrier for one schedule in this sector and this is already mentioned in both the airports' airlines n destinations. It is not the same for the other routes. So if you could provide a link like this, it would be valuable. Air India domestic schedules between BLR n BOM Now take a look at this: AIR INDIA weekly flight schedule from DEL to BLR from date 31-Oct-2010 (Abhishek191288 (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

If you cannot see the time-table properly, then i am sorry but you are wrong. Delhi's Terminal 3 is now the Main Hub of Air India and is going to be connected to Hyderabad, Chennai, Kochi, Ahmedabad apart from Amritsar, Kolkata and Mumbai

AI633 = Ahmedabad-Delhi
AI639/187 = Amritsar-Delhi (AI187 Amritsar-Delhi Leg is on A320, Delhi-Toronto on Boeing 777-300ER)
AI623 = Banaglore-Delhi
AI643 = Chennai-Delhi
AI127 = Hyderabad-Delhi (AI127 Hyderabad-Delhi leg is on A320, Delhi-Chicago on Boeing 777-300ER)
AI693 = Kochi-Delhi
AI681 = Kolkata-Delhi
AI101/143/314/348 = Mumbai-Delhi (Except AI101, all the remaining Mumbai-Delhi flights are on a A320 family aircraft, it is from Delhi, passengers board Boeing 777s/Airbus A330s to go to Paris, Hong Kong, Osaka, Shanghai)

When we say these Cities are connected to Delhi, They are operated on Airbus A320 family aircraft using Air India Callsign and Code

You don't always have references for each and every route, you have to check the time-table and schedule(Kshitij85 (talk) 18:11, 14 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Air India

Hi Kshitij85, I recently reverted your edits to Air India pages regarding primary hub. reason is that i didnt found any single reference for same. Mumbai has been primary hub for Air India from its inception as Tata Airline. If you have some quality reference which clearly specifies that now Air India primary hub has been shifted to Delhi. Please go ahead change primary hub. Thanks KuwarOnline (talk) 07:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kshitij85, I recently reverted your edits to Air India pages regarding primary hub. As the given reference says "Soon, Delhi will be Maharaja’s new capital" which means it will be in future not current. Once you get good reference showing delhi is NOW primary hub then reverts my edits and if u still feels that your giving reference is correct then we will take this to admin or else we can start talk on Air India talk page. KuwarOnline (talk) 07:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Kshitij85, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it contains the word "shit". If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Stonemason89 (talk) 00:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Kshitij" is an Indian Male Name. (Kshitij85 (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

My bad, sorry. Stonemason89 (talk) 01:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Renault Nissan Automotive India Private Limited

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Renault Nissan Automotive India Private Limited. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Nissan Motor India Private Limited. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nissan Motor India Private Limited - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — Timneu22 · talk 10:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen India and Volkswagen Group Sales India

Please note, that, per the WP:NCCORP guidelines, article titles usually should not include the legal status suffix such as "Limited". Letdorf (talk) 11:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Destination articles.

Hello, Kshitij85. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airlines.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sb617 (Talk) 11:17, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DEL airport and city names

Firstly all airlines operating out of T3 have been listed as operating out of T3, I have only seprated the domestic cities even if they are online international traffic stops and still show them flying out of T3.

Secondly stop changing city names to their now defunct old ones Calicut, Cochin, Banares, Trivandrum, Calcutta, wikipedia lists all of these articles under their new or reverted names Kozhikode, Kochi, Varanasi, Thrivananthapuram, Kolkata, do cooperate thanks.116.71.9.191 (talk) 10:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply about your username

My apologies. You do not have to change it. If you want, you can request a change at WP:CHU. -- Cirt (talk) 05:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suzuki Motor Corporation logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suzuki Motor Corporation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rahul Gandhi. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indian National Congress

The first half of your addition has no sources. Please provide the necessary cites or the material could be removed. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Memon

I can see from your Talk Page that many other editors have concerns about your edits. You must adhere to Wikipedia principles, in particular, WP:Notability. Tiger and Yakub Memon are already listed. WP:Notability is very clear, notability is not gained by being a brother or sister of a notable person, ie, a notable person is a protagonist not an accessory. If you have an issue with WP:Notability, take it up on that article's talk page but not on the Memon page or with me. You must follow Wikipedia's standards.

--Tovojolo (talk) 19:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You joined in April 2011 and you think you already know more than those of us who have been in Wikipedia for years and who have studied all of Wikipedia's precepts. The complaints on your Talk Page are evidence that you do not.

Revert once more and you violate WP:3RR which will lead to you being banned from Wikipedia.

You think you know more than me, well i have more than 10,000 edits to my credit and have been a editor since 2004. 3yrs ahead of you. I use a diffrent username for different topics. This is my 2nd account. Tell your "threatning" words to some one else. (Kshitij85 (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

If you revert the edit again, i am afraid i will have to write to a moderator to have you banned temporarily or permanently. (Kshitij85 (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

You should know then that multiple accounts, sockpuppets, are not allowed. This incident has been reported to Wikipedia, http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Re:_Memon_people, do not make any reverts until it has been resolved by Wikipedia.--Tovojolo (talk) 09:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should also know that persistent reverting is edit warring. You can be blocked for repeated reverting. You are certainly pushing the WP:3RR rule. Paul B (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should also tell the same thing to User:Tovojolo. He started the edit war inspite of me giving references. (Kshitij85 (talk) 11:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Accounts

Hi. If, as you claim above, you have multiple accounts, can I assume you have read Wikipedia policy here and acted on it, least you be accused of sock puppetry? As a long term editor you should be aware that multiple accounts are only permitted in very specific situations. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well i had made another account as there were some issues with my username and i assumed this account would have been blocked. but its not. If you have any problem you can block this account. It doesn't matter to me much as i already have another. (Kshitij85 (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I know about the problems you had with this user name, but I'm afraid that doesn't excuse use of multiple accounts (particularly if, as you suggest, this account is your second). It also doesn't work like you suggest. If it is determined that you have been using multiple accounts without good reason (as indicated in the policy) you are likely to get all your accounts blocked. This is even more likely if you've been using both while edit warring or while blocked for edit warring. I advise you to be pro-active in getting this sorted. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for edit warring

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for attacks and threats

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--KFP (contact | edits) 12:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Renault Nissan Logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Renault Nissan Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Audi India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audi India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audi India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Strikerforce^Talk 17:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]