User talk:KlayCax

June 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You continue to edit war on the Genocide Joe article/redirect. This behavior related to a contentious topic and BLP is unwise -- to say the least. O3000, Ret. (talk) 00:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a misunderstanding. See Genocide Joe's talk page. KlayCax (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No misunderstanding. O3000, Ret. (talk) 11:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KlayCax. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Topic-ban

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

topic-banned from post-1992 politics of the United States, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KlayCax. I also wanted to add, that you have been warned about your editing on infoboxes as well. Prcc27 (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gary Clayton Anderson

Hello, KlayCax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gary Clayton Anderson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jeffrey Ostler

Hello, KlayCax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeffrey Ostler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ava Kris Tyson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ava Kris Tyson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Kris Tyson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian

Hello, KlayCax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian

Hello, KlayCax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]