User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Archive 2013

You are not being helpful

At Talk:Global warming I find your sighs and allegations that I am troll instead of a conscientious editor working in good faith to be unhelpful. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

You can be very certain that i'm doing my introspection and reflections ... are you? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey KimDabelsteinPetersen; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Why did you undo my addition to the climategate page?

Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.222.237 (talk) 19:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Not cited. Not notable. Have no idea whether it is correct => Pure spam to gather interest. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Well maybe. Perhaps I can give you a link to google? Try "foia the password is redacted". I am sorry, I can't match your formatting due to lack of skill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.222.237 (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Does it work better if I log in ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewuwe (talk • contribs) 19:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

telegraphblogs Andrewuwe (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Both ofYou need to read WP:RS as well as other Wikipedia base policies. It is not enough that some blogs out there in the blogosphere writes about something. We need real coverage that matches the weight that has already been attached to the CRU kerfluffle. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

OK. Thanks, yes it is just me struggling with the tags etc. I'll wait until if it gets more weight. Andrewuwe (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Low-carbon power talk page discussion

Replied to you there, let me know if you have any further issues with the article? Boundarylayer (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

about wind power cost per one installization.

can u mail me, how much cost of a windpower plantation of an single. how much energy output. how much duration of time to install. all total cost of an one install. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krissharrison1 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

Your input at the talk page would be appreciated. Moonraker (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Addictiveness of nicotine

I understand why you hid the discussion about the addictiveness of nicotine, but I would argue that when discussing the alleged "gateway effect" the addictive potential of nicotine when divorced from tobacco is on topic. If pure nicotine isn't particularly addictive (non-smokers who used nicotine patches for 6 months showed no withdrawal symptoms after the tests ended, and none continued using nicotine) then the "gateway effect" argument becomes even more ridiculous than it already is.--FergusM1970^{Let's play Freckles} 06:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yobol (talk) 13:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Whoa! 'tis been years since i've gotten one of those the last time :) --Kim D. Petersen 17:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

E-cig addictiveness and the CDC

CDC have just released some more data from their study on tobacco use among American youth - for some reason they held it back initially. Can't think why. Anyway, this is a secondary source because it's a CDC analysis of a National Youth Tobacco Survey study. E-cig use has doubled and tobacco use is down.--FergusM1970^{Let's play Freckles} 22:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)