User talk:Kestasjk
Sandgroper Is a genuine usage - just because you havent heard of it does not mean you revert something like that - if people did that by logical extension half of wikipedia could be deleted - specially by geographically challenged persons
- http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Sandgroper_(insect)
- http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Sandgroper - the existence of a disambig list like that is sufficient to leave the item in
SatuSuro 09:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- You have a problem? - your best bet is not my talk page - but http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Western_Australia - that way the other west australian project editors might chip in as well - if you are patient - some of them are not quick repsonders - cheers SatuSuro 11:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I think it's in the process of finding a middle ground that is informative without giving any false impressions. Not sure what you mean by "geographically challenged" though, I don't think Pilbara or Perth or anywhere else within WA is any more "true WA" than elsewhere, it's all WA (if that's what you're getting at). Regards, Kestasjk (talk) 03:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- OK - the allusion to geographically challenged wasnt even meant to refer to you in any way whatsoever - it is the small limited experience american teenagers who try to say that the 'java' programming language precedes java the island... (as an example) - there are parts of wikipedia that are re-invented periodically by new generations of editors who dont bother to read around or up on areas that they want to reinvent - what is very reassuring about your response is that you have show WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, and have understood that the issue. Maybe you could have a look at other lesser articles (rather than WA or Perth) and see if you can offer thoughts or suggestions on the less prominent subjects - there is always plenty to do! SatuSuro 04:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I think it's in the process of finding a middle ground that is informative without giving any false impressions. Not sure what you mean by "geographically challenged" though, I don't think Pilbara or Perth or anywhere else within WA is any more "true WA" than elsewhere, it's all WA (if that's what you're getting at). Regards, Kestasjk (talk) 03:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Online diplomacy screenshot.png
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Online diplomacy screenshot.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)