User talk:Kelvintjy

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kelvintjy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Allen4names 05:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pirate Rangers

SamuraiCast and JEFusion are not reliable sources because they are fansites. Also it's April Fools' Day, so don't believe anything that anyone is claiming is official today.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Can you help me delete the photo of the gohonzon in the Sōka Gakkai as the user named Catflap08 keep restoring the picture. I also do not want to be blame for vandalism on that article.

According to my Buddhist believe, photographing of the Gohonzon are discouraged because the resulting copies can be easily desecrated, abused, or misused.

--Kelvintjy (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate that your beliefs may restrict the distribution of certain images, I'm afraid that our policy is that Wikipedia is not censored. Many religions have such beliefs and trying to satisfy all of them would be incompatible with our goal of building an encyclopedia. There is some room for compromise in terms of placement and size of images, but this is a matter for discussion on the talk page of the article in question. If you want to avoid seeing the image yourself, please see Help:Options to hide an image. If you feel there is some copyright problem with the image being used, you could raise the issue at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taiseki-ji: Shōhondō edits

The information about the architects' opinions on the destruction of Shōhondō reflects Sōka Gakkai bias and does not, in my opinion, merit placement on the page. --Scandiescot — Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 13 September 2013‎

The temple was in fact regarded as a masterpiece of modern architecture, and architects in Japan and elsewhere did in fact deplore its demolition. There is nothing biased about reporting these facts. I located an archive of the Washington Post article, and put that paragraph back into the Shōhondō section. --Margin1522 (talk) 11:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert

You recently reverted one of my edits but you didn't use an edit summary or open a discussion in Talk. Can you please explain why you reverted my edit? In other words, what is it about the cited source that makes you believe that it's (a) reliable and (b) noteworthy enough to include in an encyclopedia article? Have any scholars or experts ever used that ranking or written favorably about it or is it just one of dozens of new rankings that proliferate on the Internet as people try to proclaim themselves experts whose products we should purchase? ElKevbo (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Club of Rome, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you made this same change before, also without explanation. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before continuing. - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

= Soka Gakkai Educational activities

I know you have edited the section on "educational activities" on the Soka Gakkai page. Are you the one responsible for the new "Soka Education System" page? If so - nice going. If not -- check it out. Thanks. --Daveler16 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nichiren Shoshu

Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out. You know, Hardly ANYTHING in the N Shoshu entry has a valid reference. --Daveler16 (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITEKILL

This is the second time you've added numerous superfluous references to the Soka Gakkai article. Please read WP:CITEKILL and adhere to it moving forward. Three or four is more than enough. wound theology ◈ 06:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvintjy : you also have been modifying the Daisaku Ikeda article without any arguments of using the "Talk" page. The change you made there (change = just getting back to an older version) does not respect several WP rules, among which the most important : NPOV. For instance, writing that Ikeda was a controversial leader is not an opinion, it's just a fact, it's sourced, and I am wondering what reasons you may have to censore this. Also, if you are a member of an organization and act on WP without being honnest about it, that is another rule you are breaking. Raoul mishima (talk) 14:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GrayStorm^{(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.)} 01:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soka Gakkai International

It is fine if you object to the redirect. But you need to discuss exactly why you object to it when reverting. wound theology ◈ 11:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Political dissidence in the Empire of Japan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please engage in the discussion on the talk page. Peaceray (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kelvintjy reported by User:Peaceray (Result: ). Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear kelvin@Kelvintjy,

Will you please tell us now what’s going on ? Raoul mishima (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits to the Omamori page suggest an attempt to promote Soka Gakkai. 86.22.108.188 (talk) 04:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.wound theology ◈ 07:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

{{an3-notice}

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Soka Gakkai) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]