User talk:Juergen Bode

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:RMCE2.PNG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:RMCE2.png. The copy called Image:RMCE2.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Site-specific recombinases: Classification, properties and dedicated applications.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes/references

Hi, I'm responding to your feedback comment on how to create a footnote. You can't really use the format of footnotes used in print because the status of citations in Wikipedia is always subject to change. What is footnote 3 today might become footnote 2 or 10 tomorrow - or it could be wiped away with a new and better source. There is ample documentation on how to create footnotes/citations - in fact, so much that it may be confusing. I suggest you read over the documentation, much of which is noted in the template at Template:Wikipedia referencing. You'll see there is a specific section for beginners. Before trying to do anything on your own, find lots of articles that use lots of citations and study to see how they put them together. Unfortunately there are many different styles, but at least this template does indicate which ones are no longer being used. -- kosboot (talk) 13:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to see a good format especially if you have multiple citations to the same page, take a look at an article I recently created: Drexel 4257. -- kosboot (talk) 22:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Recombinase-mediated cassette exchange, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Integration and Resolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this hint! I simply postponed these additions to the disambiguity pages and forgot Juergen Bode (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New image

Count your self lucky that I deleted File:RMCE.PNG since you: were not logged in, used the {{Löschen}} tag (I am surprised it worked - we talk English here - you should use {{db}}), did not include the delete reason within the tag and you used external link format instead of a wikilink to point to the using article. You said "I could not find an other way to show my updated grafic". Are you seriously telling me that this edit was too difficult for you? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Site-specific recombinases: Classification, properties and dedicated applications concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Site-specific recombinases: Classification, properties and dedicated applications, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: The fact that, for humans and mice, a small set of orthologues implicated in reproduction, host defence and immunity have been subject to selection and thereby modification should not distract from major compliances which explain the extraortrdinary relevance of murin genome projects (among these EUCOMM). See: Emes RD, Goodstadt L, Winter EE, Ponting CP.(2003) Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology. Hum Mol Genet. 1;12(7):701-9 http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/7/701.long

Please note that this page is focused on usages of RMCE to understand human diseases with the suüüort of mouse models. Well knowing that, by nature, there are cetain restrictions and limitations, I did not want to distract the reader´s attention too much from the core matter of this approach. I will be glad to write a separate article about the value of mouse models, if there is an actual need to do so. Kind regards and thanks, JB

Your article submission Site-specific recombinases: Classification, properties and dedicated applications

Hello Juergen Bode. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Site-specific recombinases: Classification, properties and dedicated applications.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Site-specific recombinases: Classification, properties and dedicated applications}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SMARs facultative.png

Thank you for uploading File:SMARs facultative.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]