Jump to content

User talk:Jo7hs2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Jo7hs2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! WLU (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinlock Shelter

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was Keep due to discussion below.-- Jo7hs2 (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kinlock Shelter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This rock shelter doesn't seem to be very notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fangfufu (talk) 03:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. The location has intrinsic cultural significance. It is mentioned or featured in several publications, has been featured in a television program on Alabama Public Television, and is well known to frequent visitors of Bankhead National Forest and Sipsey Wilderness, and the local native-american population. I will concede that the article could use some improvement, and I will carry out such improvement, but it is not worthy of deletion.Jo7hs2
I have completed several improvements to the article, and will continue to improve it. Jo7hs2 (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about this proposed deletion. I was sorting the backlog of new page that required to be patrolled. It is just that when I first googled about it, not a lot seemed to have come up. I have to apologise for my hastiness on putting on the wrong tag. I think the article is getting better. Next time I will be more careful on putting tags on. Fangfufu (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I could have made it clearer in the article what the significance was, and I could have done a better job positioning references so that the article was more clearly sourced. Jo7hs2 (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just added a line regarding the site, feel free to delete, if you feel it doesn't fit in the article. Fangfufu (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, actually it is important to note that camping is currently prohibited there (also w/in .5mi of the nearby falls), because people often camp in rock shelters in Bankhead National Forest.Jo7hs2 (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Fangfufu (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I knew. Just goofed. Jo7hs2 (talk) 17:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ulchee

[edit]

What are Ulchee? it appears in the article Kinlock Shelter. I tried to google it, I couldn't find a lot information. Fangfufu (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Ulchee were a tribe of Native Americans. I don't think they were a particularly large or well documented tribe, so that might explain the lack of information. It is also possible they were a subset of Cherokee indians, but I don't really know much beyond that. I've only seen the name described as a tribe, nothing more. Jo7hs2 (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congratuations for finding the correct spellings!!! It has bothered me for a while. Fangfufu (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And also, what's CCC? I might be able to add something. Fangfufu (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The CCC was the Civilian Conservation Corps, which was a Great Depression era New Deal program in the United States. They constructed a variety of camps (both for work and recreation) and constructed a variety of buildings and features as a way of employing out of work Americans. Jo7hs2 (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Alabama!

[edit]

Hi there! Welcome to the Alabama Project. We are glad to have you on board. I am JodyB, one of the members and an administrator here. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know. I live in Daphne, across from Mobile. JodyB talk 17:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be with you. I just spent three years hiking and photographing Alabama while I was in school at Samford. I've left the state, but I'm slowly filtering what I know into Wikipedia. Jo7hs2 (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Issues in deletion of Diazepunk

[edit]

I seem to have screwed up in the nomination process, the article did not properly add into articles for deletion.Jo7hs2 (talk) 02:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved. Apparently the capital letter in nomination screwed something up? Jo7hs2 (talk) 02:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

diezapampunks or whatever the band name is

[edit]

You said "butt" he-he-he!

No problem, its not about people, but about content  ;) Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 19:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See why AGF is so important? If we are hard-heade but flexible, good things happen. Now this article stay, without question, instead of a weak consensus, we have a strong one. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 18:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh M.H.M High School & College, Doha-Qatar

[edit]

Yeah, I got them...as I got many other recent changes. I won't lose my temper defending the article, but I'll check it out every now and then. Hopefully it will get the atention of others recent changes patroler and if vandalism continues blocks will roll!. Cheers!. --Seba5618 (talk) 22:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bah Humbug

[edit]

Just so you know, my username is Spartaz. The Humbug is my talk page. Happy New Year. Spartaz Humbug! 22:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your shift of opinion on this AfD. Reading it, it struck me that it had struck you, and I wrote a comment after yours aimed at the author(s), that someone thinks this is important and has put a lot of effort into it, and has really done a nice job. Could this be a school project? Looking at the history, I don't think it is. But the article seems harmless even if it doesn't meet the normal criteria for inclusion. Forgetting the rules, how would it harm Wikipedia? Disk space is not expensive. But Google would likely give the Wikipedia entry on the search term prominence, so I suppose if the timetable changed or the route was canceled, people might find incorrect information. It might also encourage advertising in countries where there is more competition on bus routes. I don't see these as very strong negatives. On a scale of -100 to 100, I would rate this one as -3.

Maybe it is a school project, which is why I am writing here, not on the AfD page. Any thoughts or ideas? I really do not have strong opinions, apart from finding a way to avoid endless debates on the same subject. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I'm holding out on any discussion of the article on the merits now that the AfD is such a horrible mess. I generally think that having an encyclopedia entry for every bus route is a little excessive when lists already exist, but that is an argument distinct from deleting non-notable bus routes. Jo7hs2 (talk) 03:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a mess. I sort of want to find a more general way of resolving messes like this in the future. And I sort of think I should quit AfD debates for a while and go back to writing new articles on villages, rivers, islands, UFOs and other non-controversial topics. Loch Alsh is a peaceful place. Aymatth2 (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goldendoodle

[edit]

Hi. I have reverted your recent edits to goldendoodle. At least two of them were helpful to the article. Mine went with the section it was in and the other showed a puppy, which is important because the appearance of these dogs changes a lot as they grow up. The third was a quality image. I understand the need to not have a billion images on the article, but let's not delete ones that are useful. Illinois2011 (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you're interested in amateur radio. I've been thinking about getting my license myself. Do you have any tips for me? Illinois2011 (talk) 00:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I already have the ARRL book, so I guess the next step is to find my local club. Illinois2011 (talk) 22:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Wozniak

[edit]

I see you removed the Prod form the article. Why? ttonyb1 (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noted on ttonyb1 (talk) to see article talk. Jo7hs2 (talk) 01:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I don't believe he would survive the AfD (I am not convinced the articles support notability), but I will let someone else nominate. Enjoy... ttonyb1 (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emancipating Something New

[edit]

Okay, I am going to try to find some references. Thanks for your help! NewAfrika (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, on the contrary. If the author can source the article then it should not be deleted. §FreeRangeFrog 02:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the only reason why I tagged it was because I did a quick search on the subject title and found nothing. Zero hits. This is usually a big warning sign for hoaxes. However, in this case if we're talking about a French film from the 30s then I guess searching for the title in French would have been more productive :) §FreeRangeFrog 03:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Left a message on the French equivalent to the Village Pump. We'll see if we get something from them. Otherwise, assuming no response from NewAfrika, I'll just prod it. §FreeRangeFrog 21:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed on the AfD vs PROD. The response I got from the French Wikipedia was that it's probably a hoax. We'll give it another day or so. §FreeRangeFrog 23:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Wozniak Edits

[edit]

Hi, Thanks for deleting my post on Mike Wozniak.

If you took the time to look at the references I used, you would have found out that it was all correct. Please edit my style - but do not acuse me of vandalism when it was so well referenced. This was my first attempt to help the Wiki experiment. I am too busy to rewrite the whole page again. It took me ages. I am very demoralised. Please return the content as it was and I will tone down the style if you wish.

Best wishes, RhysRhys H Thomas (talk) 19:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed on user's talk page. Jo7hs2 (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much indeed. I am very grateful Rhys10:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhys H Thomas (talkcontribs)

Re: North Alabama Lions

[edit]
Don’t worry about it. You did a great job on fixing it. I will keep a eye on it. Keep up the good work. . --Michael (Talk) 14:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the quick work. I honestly don't know much on the subject... I just recent joined the Article Rescue Squad and thought that looked like a mighty fine article to attempt to save. If I find anything else, I'll be sure to add it in. I'm not sure it really helps the cause of saving the articles and proving notability, but on the MPC's Minor Planet Discoverers, they are listed as the 113th most prolific discoverers of Minor Planets. Unfortunately, since they seem to have stopped working in that capacity in 1998, the internet doesn't have much for me to find. -- PEPSI2786talk 01:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE

[edit]

I read your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trimper's Haunted House. Can you please add those references in. We REALLY cannot afford to have this article deleted.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 03:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up

[edit]

Re this. I won't contest. Thanks for the heads up! I appreciate your courtesy! --Bensin (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Florida Whig Party

[edit]

Yeah, I have no problem with leaving the Talk page the way it is. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about the block? I don't think it was appropriate, she seemed to be discussing her edits. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I hope she continues to discuss after she comes back from her block. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can buy that. Though one wonders, if this is not a state party of the main national party, why it was linked to from the main national party page. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to revert it, go ahead, then I'll list it. Who then was a gentleman? (talk)

OK. Cheers. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly don't think you were being incivil, and I hope you don't think that I was. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've withdrawn my nomination. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Florida Whig Party

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Florida Whig Party, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Whig Party (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on contribution to Eric Joyce site

[edit]

Thanks for your positive comments much appreciated. Will have a look around at other British Poliitican sites where I do actually know something with the aim of ensuring that the site has a neutral POV. Quite a challenge as temps can run quite high esp at the moment.Suecooper (talk) 09:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suecooper (talk) 09:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Welcome![reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I just proposed a merger of the hip-hop theat"re" page into hip-hop theat"er". Since you have edited this page in the past, I though you may want to contribute to the discussion here. You don't have to respond if you don't want to but I thought I should extend the invitation. Gbern3 (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Gore Effect AfD

[edit]

You previously commented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gore Effect. A new version of the article has been created at The Gore Effect and has been nominated for deletion. If you have any views on this, please feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gore Effect. -- ChrisO (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Campus Ambassadors wanted in Troy, Alabama

[edit]

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're a member of WikiProject Alabama. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at Troy University, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

I know Alabama is a big state, but if you happen to live near Troy and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from Troy who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

[edit]

Hello, Jo7hs2! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GLAM-Wiki Baltimore meetup

[edit]

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Maryland

[edit]

It was recently suggested that WikiProject Maryland might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. --Kumioko (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DC-area Meetup, Saturday, October 8

[edit]
National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really.
You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic·t 16:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

[edit]
Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Jo7hs2. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amateur radio.
Message added 22:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I don't want to spam you, but I think this is important, and would like to know your opinion. WingtipvorteX PTT 22:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amateur Radio Association at the University of Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur Radio Association at the University of Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOD Needs You!

[edit]

Hi there Jo7hs2! I've noticed you have yourself listed as a member of the Food and Drink Wikiproject. Unfortunately it looks like the project has been slowly sliding into inactivity except for a couple of people. That makes me a sad potato, and nobody likes a sad potato amirite?

If you'd like to turn my frown upside down, can you do two small things?

First off, go here and add {{Tick}} (checkY) next to your name if you're still part of the project.

Second, go to the project talkpage and participate in a discussion about how to make the project more active, and how to go about making articles in our area of interest a lot better.

You don't want to make me cry, do you? Potatoes have a lot of eyes you know. So come on, join in! :)

— The Potato Hose 18:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - September 2013

[edit]

WP:Food

[edit]

It would be appreciated if you joined in the conversation occurring at WT:Food regarding the layout and presentation of the project's main page. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - October 2013

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Jo7hs2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jo7hs2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jo7hs2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:KINLOCKBLUFF.JPG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KINLOCKBLUFF.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get WikiProject Amateur Radio back on the air!

[edit]

Hi, I'm Dr vulpes (💬📝) and I'm currently doing my best to resurrect the amateur radio WikiProject. A lot of the articles need some serious work and so I'm trying to organize an article improvement drive in October. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from the list on the project page and I'll never badger you again. 73! Dr vulpes (💬📝) 00:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]