Jump to content

User talk:Jmfriesen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jmfriesen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 22:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit, but you do realise that you've put the Army insignia on the Navy page, don't you? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern. I have fixed all I changed, to the best of my knowledge.Jmfriesen (talk) 04:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I've just noticed that you did the same thing on the Air Force page. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thank you for your concern. However, they are correct, as the ranks and insignia of the Canadian Air Force are identical to the ones used in the Canadian Army. The only difference is the blue and green(only on the dress uniform, on combats they are there is no difference), as well as the eagle on the Air Force insignia(only on the dress uniform also). Jmfriesen (talk) 00:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. And unusual too, I believe. i.e. I'm not aware of any other nation where the Air Force insignia is identical to the army insignia - the same rank name is quite common, but not the insignia.
Note that http://www.uniforminsignia.net doesn't agree with you.
Pdfpdf (talk) 00:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see I misinterpreted your reply. Yes, the difference is the background colour, not the arrangement of stripes, crowns and maple leaves.
Never-the-less, on a page where almost all of the insignia are some shade of blue, the green "doesn't quite look right". Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Saipan contradiction?

[edit]

Why do you say the Battle of Saipan article contradicts the Order of Battle? Looks basically the same to me. As a reminder, that template does prompt you to explain on the talk page what exactly the concern is... they're certainly similar enough that if there is something that doesn't match, you could probably tag that specific division that's only mentioned on one page with "citation needed." SnowFire (talk) 04:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmfriesen. Please review the instructions at {{recent death}}. You will see that the template is not applicable to an article such as Guido de Marco (from which I have removed it yet again), as that article is not undergoing heavy editing. For the entirety of yesterday, there were only 30 edits by 13 editors. Bongomatic 04:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I guess instructions are there for a reason, right? Jmfriesen (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No biggie. At first I thought the instructions were dumb. But over time I've come to think that the template is a little sensationalist, so I try to remove them. Bongomatic 14:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup

[edit]

Invitation to Vancouver meetup

[edit]

Hello,

Wikipedian British Columbians are planning a meetup at the Vancouver Public Library, Central Branch, on Sunday, October 16th, as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube 03:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Vancouver meetup

[edit]

Hello,

You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Rodgers may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • became a Canadian citizen on 21 October 2011, and resides in Surrey, British Columbia. <ref>[[cite web|last=Diakiw |first=Kevin |url=http://www.surreyleader.com/news/232744371.html |title=A
  • |title=A Tale of Two Surreys |publisher=surreyleader.com |year=2013 |accessdate= 20 November 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Junior |first=Chris M. |url=http://ultimateclassicrock.com/paul-rodgers-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]