User talk:Jikaoli Kol/Archives/2020/January
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
my page about the oagaden masacre
why was my page flagged as non-free material the killing of refugees from Ethiopia during the civil war is well documented from various sources however the name could be changed i agree other then that I don't see an issue should something be done about the article and in what way please specify so i can improve the article--Gashaamo (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Greetings Jikaoli Kol, above editor was blocked as a confirmed sock, hope you do not mind me putting a strikethrough their text. Regards --Kzl55 (talk) 21:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I appreciate it. Thank you very much! JK (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chanel ayan
Hi. You stated the reason for proposing to delete Chanel ayan is that she is unremarkable. Could you explain further? Because, this is a model who is well known all over the world in her field of expertise and people and brands that she has worked with, especially in the middle east. I believe that there are links in the article that prove so. Kindly undo the action pls. Kelvinsage1 (talk) 13:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Benjamin Z M Lee
Hello, Jikaoli Kol! I’m deeply concerned with your unfair treatment of new users such as me I want to accentuate that I’m not a paid editor, I’m a new user who is interested in chess, computer games and innovative persons with ethical value such as Benjamin Z M Lee. I read about his position on fair and ethical capitalism and that what gained my attention as it is a rare thing in our times (ethics and capitalism are not good friends usually). The person is also notable for his advocacy work at non-profit organization and a frequent lecturer on fair capitalism. It is a new generation of entrepreneurs who make our world better. I don’t have any single purpose account — it was my first article and you can’t accuse anyone of having SPA if they just open an account and publish a first article. You didn’t assume good faith as well. The article about Benjamin ZM Lee had been already reviewed and accepted by the community assuming the subject has enough reliable sources. He is on board of the university (quite a reliable source) and he has for at least 7 reliable, independent secondary sources:
https://vulcanpost.com/13476/sugar-app-savior-small-businesses/
https://www.suss.edu.sg/experience-at-suss/entrepreneurship/mentorship
https://www.startupdaily.net/2014/09/offended-job-ad-posted-singapore-based-startup-sugar/
https://www.tnp.sg/news/spore-tech-start-says-discriminatory-ad-meant-be-read-pinch-salt
https://www.techinasia.com/dont-judge-a-company-by-its-job-ad-a-sugar-intern-shares-his-experience
I understand that you check a lot of articles every day but it seems to me that automatic, quick and mechanic treatment of new articles cause unfair and biased treatment of new users coming with the good faith. As I read in one good article, even a good person can become a hostage of his bias and stereotypes once he does something everyday (for example, police officers are inclined to be more suspicious due to their daily treatment of issues and many professional become more cynical in their daily work routine). I can tell you quite honestly, you discourage me from further editing by applying these stereotypes to me. I have no idea how I can improve this article because this is the best I can do at my present level of knowledge and I see that in comparison with many other articles on Wikipedia, I created a fairly good article for a novice. All the information in the article is well sourced and I haven't written anything that is not sourced, so you could for at least specify it. I would like to submit the draft for review by the other experienced editors to get a clearer picture after all this confusion and misunderstanding. Meanwhile, I would appreciate if you can specify which information brought your attention as not sourced - I can source it or remove it according to the Wikipedia guidelines\ --Wiserared (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry about your experience. You can still submit your draft to AFC. Thank you, JK (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
About Undisclosed payed article tag for Scott Yoo.
I recently noticed the afore mentioned article was tagged as a possible undisclosed payed contribution.
I definitely wrote this content without being payed. Therefore, I will gladly clean-up any possible mistake that could have lead to this assumption. I will be so thankful for any advice.
I wrote this article driven by my admiration for this conductor and relevance of his work as a Principal at Mexico City's Phil.
Regards.
Sonojacker (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Sonojacker
- Okay, please submit via AFC--JK (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Snoopy06
- Hello Jikaoli Kol, I was not paid for this article, I am an art lover and art student in the past. I have discovered it by myself in the Albertina museum and decided to write about them. They don't know about it and I was not paid. Snooopy06 (talk) 14:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Good, please vet through AFC. --JK (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)