Jump to content

User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2016/April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wednesday April 13, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon NYC and Mini-Video Opportunity

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

Special this month, a Mini-Video opportunity for individuals to share their Wikipedia experiences (during pre-meeting, 6-7pm, and in side-office during regular meetup). A videographer will be present to record 1-3 minute Mini-Videos of folks informally speaking, sharing anything about their Wikipedia-related projects, whether an edit-a-thon they joined, an article they edited, or a class project they were a part of, etc.

We will also follow up on plans for recent (Art+Feminism!) and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

We will also place our chapter's votes for the global Wikimedia Foundation board.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

6:00pm - 7:00pm Mini-Video and social hour
7:00pm - 9:00pm Regular meeting: Introduction for new participants, Noshing, Chapter projects

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience!

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

@Jimfbleak:Hi, I do not know why you asked user:NihartouJason to take discussion of Frederick Achom page to his personal sandbox instead of the article's talk page as this SPA account removed sourced material and only retained the defamation content. Can you please, let me know? Also this[1] might give you more clear picture. Thanks, --Aliopuka (talk) 13:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

I replied there. From what I read of the sources at the time, Jason's version was well-sourced, encyclopedic, etc., while the versions he was fighting were all puffery or removal of sourced content. No, I have not read the article lately, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 23:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)