User talk:Jamesfield1994

Hi James, I noticed you created the article Darsmansk. I can't find any indication that the term is in use anywhere, and frankly, it seems like it is an attack page. Could you give some background on the subject? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really have nothing better to do. Just leave it up there. All of my mates use it so i think it is a suitable word for wikipedea to have. There is no virus' linked to it.

Next time you attack another contributor, make a threat, or any other inappropriate edit, you will be blocked. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamesfield1994 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please let me back. I have relavent information. It was my friend who made these remarks while i was out. Jamesfield1994 (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Very poor excuse! We have seen enough of your "relavent [sic!] information". Favonian (talk) 23:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.