User talk:JASpencer
| This is JASpencer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
test
[edit]Southern Caucus
[edit]To Do list for the Southern Caucus
- Master of the Senate notes, p .197
- Page 961 track down note
- Hennings filibuster, 788-9
- Links from Master of the Senate
- Master of the Senate citations
- Expand Costigan-Wagner Bill
- Expand Southern filibuster
- History (particularly role of anti lynching legislation)
- Check text in linked articles including Solid South
- Incorporate Bloch book
- Incorporate dissertation
JASpencer (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Leland Olds
[edit]- Articles about nomination process
- Leland Olds page
JASpencer (talk) 11:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirkwall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Burghs.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirkwall (Burgh), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawrence Dundas.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
"Joey Jo-Jo Junior Shabadoo" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Joey Jo-Jo Junior Shabadoo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 24 § Joey Jo-Jo Junior Shabadoo until a consensus is reached. Xeroctic (talk) 15:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Socialist Alternatives for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialist Alternatives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.