User talk:Intellibeing

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of NisarKand (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Al Qaeda Reader, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Al Qaeda Reader was changed by Intellibeing (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-26T05:05:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prediction of usa collapse

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prediction of usa collapse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blowdart | ^talk 08:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to IRAS, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Wwheaton (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The object in question was a small comet, Comet IRAS-Araki-Alcock (C/1983 H1), which happened to pass very near the Earth. I saw it at the time with my naked eye, from my backyard. The linked article from the Washington Post is incorrect re date and position, though it seems to refer to the same object, which was quite unique, and famous for closeness and apparent large size, as it appeared to the naked eye. Wwheaton (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to United States. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Wwheaton (talk) 20:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC) This editor seems to be editing from a strong religious/political POV, to the point of borderline vandalism, though probably in good faith. Wwheaton (talk) 20:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Saudi Chinese Relations, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=76692&d=23&m=1&y=2006. As a copyright violation, Saudi Chinese Relations appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Saudi Chinese Relations has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Saudi Chinese Relations and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Saudi Chinese Relations with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Saudi Chinese Relations.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Polar (talk) 18:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked as a sockpuppet of the banned user NisarKand. Even if you are not NisarKand, this is a clear single-purpose account used only for edit warring and POV-pushing. I also see copyright violations and even vandalism warnings on this talk page. Khoi khoi 06:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I am not sockpuppet of NisarKand and second I am correcting bs in wiki...so is that bad.