User talk:Hydrostatics

please see: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Carlos_Brebbia --Curuxz 10:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your comment, thank you. --Curuxz 13:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting your changes on User:Samthebarth, I was monitoring Recent Changes last night and obviously didn't check what I was reverting - blanking a page is usually vandalism on mainspace pages so I probably didn't notice that it was a user page that I reverted --Careless hx 16:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One of your comments has been altered

It appears that one of your comments at Talk:Human penis size, made 13:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC), has been altered by meco. 72.76.99.208 19:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input

Thank you for your input on the Human penis size talk page. You give the recalcitrant editor some good ideas -- if only he would implement some of them. 72.68.123.113 12:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That silly porn list/table

David, that silly list being pushed for inclusion in the Human penis size article does not belong there, nor does it belong in the Pornography project page. So sourcing is not germane to the issue, as I see it. I will not discuss the matter there. 72.68.123.113 21:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, why do you feel like that? While I agree that the list in its current form has little to no encyclopaedic content, I feel that a compromise, such as a well-written paragraph about fame gathered from penis size, could contriute a lot to the article. Hydrostatics 21:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A paragraph, or two, short, yes, pointing to a separate article, as has been proposed by, you! But the editor wants to include this cumbersome table/list that consists mainly, or exclusively, of pornstars. The article is about anatomy and sexuality, not pornography. 72.68.123.113 21:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Jasonvieaux.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jasonvieaux.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 21:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation

Dear Hydrostatics, I accepted to stop my edits in the article because of COI and now I just make suggestions at the discussion page. But User:Athaenara doesn't care about suggested references (reliable and most of them from 3rd party) on the discussion page and places a lot of "citation needed" tags in the article. Also he keeps the boxes on top of the article although the article changed completely and meanwhile HE seems to be the main author. Please get your own picture of that mess and help to make that article a good one (or at least a readable one). Benderson2 10:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive

Hasn't had any activity since mid-November. And I wanted to ask him about his work on the Disney portal...Resident Mario (talk) 00:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Hydrostatics/Mulan

User:Hydrostatics/Mulan, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hydrostatics/Mulan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Hydrostatics/Mulan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Mushu from kh.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mushu from kh.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sandstein 06:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Confirm Involvement in WikiProject Disney

Hello Hydrostatics! I'm a new member of the Disney WikiProject. I'm trying to confirm who is still interested in the WikiProject in hopes to build a team of that can revamp the project. Please let me know if you would like to stay on the list of active members, or if I can go ahead and move to you the list of inactive members. You can do so by replying to this message and including the {{reply to|GeekInParadise}} tag. Happy editing! GeekInParadise (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mulan Screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mulan Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]