User talk:Headbomb/unreliable
 | If you're curious about why a source is highlighted, first check common cleanup and non-problematic cases and limitations, which should answer most questions. Feel free to make requests for various tweaks or more sources to be covered below and I'll address things as best I can. − Headbomb {t · c · p · b} |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
SouthFront.press
[edit]WP:SOUTHFRONT is blacklisted in general, but one of the known domains (southfront.press) might not be on the script. - Amigao (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- southfront.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- southfront.press: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Can we mark WeChat as we do other WP:UGC sources? - Amigao (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- weixin.qq.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Amigao (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Business Insider URL change
[edit]Just came here to note that apparently Business Insider has updated their URLs (which previously were only "www.insider.com
") to point to "www.businessinsider.com
", and as such, these newer URLs are not presently marked by this script. Thank you in advance! Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
JPAD
[edit]An excerpt about The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease from the book by Charles Piller related to Sylvain Lesné and Cassava Sciences investigations:
SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @SandyGeorgia:, sorry I'm only seeing this message now. While I fully agree that the concerns in the book are legit, and concerning, the issue here is that I'm not sure how we should consider the journal as a whole. It looks like the EiCs gave themselves a pass on their papers, but the others were... maybe not given free passes? Was it only those EiCs, affecting JAPD for only a certain span or time, or was the journal always hopelessly shit? Does the transfer to Elsevier from Springer Nature earlier this year affect this? Or before with SERDI Publishers?
- I'm enclined to treat the journal as at least yellow levels of bad (i.e. marginally reliable), but I think a wider discussion needs to happen to treat the journal as worse than that (e.g. generally unreliable/deprecated/blacklisted). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:44, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Headbomb sorry I haven't had time to followup either. I wonder if a query at WT:MED would be a helpful first start? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Notes:
- 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100021
- 10.14283/jpad.2024.170
- jpreventionalzheimer.com
- WP:JCW/J64#Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
- WP:JCW/J6#J Prev Alzheimers Dis