User talk:Gaussgauss

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nephron T|C 06:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hey Gaussgauss, you're doing some jolly good medical edits there! I've moved Diastolic Dysfunction to diastolic dysfunction (according to WP:NC we only capitalise proper names).

Would you be interested in joining WP:CLINMED, the WikiProject for doctors? JFW | T@lk 21:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding a reference to clubbing. Ideally, we should be using full academic citations for journal articles etc. Dave Iberri has written a useful applet that converts PMID codes into full citations: click here to access this tool. JFW | T@lk 09:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pneumonia

Do you have a ref for double pneumonia being used to describe pneumonia in two lungs by health professionals? Thanks. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Familial and racial clubbing

Can you please add references to your following edition under Nail Clubbing: "Familial and racial clubbing and "pseudoclubbing" (people of African descent often have what appears to be clubbing)." Many thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.140.255.254 (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DKA

I have temporarily removed some of your additions to the DKA article, because I could not find sources to support the claims made. Please discuss on Talk:Diabetic ketoacidosis. JFW | T@lk 11:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if my comments seemed unduly harsh and if I misunderstood you. I have responded on Talk:Diabetic ketoacidosis. JFW | T@lk 18:39, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just a note to say thanks for your help with medicine-related articles. If you'd like to talk to other people who are interested in this subject, please feel free to stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine and say hello. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gaussgauss. You have new messages at WhatamIdoing's talk page.
Message added 19:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Keloid

Hello, Gaussgauss! I recently made this change to the American Civil War article, but was twice reverted. I found some interesting facts about photo on this website — "This specific whipping was made to appear more brutal by the subject's rare Keloid Cyst skin condition, causing excessive growth of scar tissue." I would like to know if you would be interested in giving your opinion. Thank your very much and kind regards, Tobby72 (talk) 12:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diabetic ketoacidosis

I have difficulty responding to your message on Talk:Diabetic ketoacidosis. Your tone continues to be accusatory. Please don't do that.

You obviously have a very good understanding of pathophysiology, but you have been less effective in supporting your points with the kind of sources that I could use to improve the article. As editor in the medical field I consider myself bound by WP:MEDRS, so small case series do not constitute suitable sources.

I await a comment on Talk:Diabetic ketoacidosis with a suitable source and slightly less venom. JFW | T@lk 22:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would like to ask you to remove your rant about "Wiki-Nazis" from your userpage. You might dislike my attitude, much like I have disliked yours so far, but you have managed to lower yourself to poisoning the well in a manner that is quite at odds with your self-proclaimed academic standing. JFW | T@lk 15:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again

Good to see you around again. Hope things are well. JFW | T@lk 21:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination of Bełżec extermination camp

Hi. I noticed that your good article nominee of Bełżec extermination camp was not formatted correctly. The solution is to change to "{{subst:GAN|subtopic=World history}}" and put it above on the article's talk page. --IRISZOOM (talk) 01:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Jewish mathematicians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantum theory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caught by a web host block

I am just a normal guy who's done a bit of editing for years on Wikipedia. I am a computer ignoramus. SOMETHING IS WRONG. PLEASE HELP - Thank youGaussgauss (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaussgauss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. This has never happened before. Could it be because I sometimes use HOLA? Thanks! Gaussgauss (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If your IP is the issue, we'll need to know your IP to take action (it should be mentioned in the block message; some four-part number like "123.45.67.89"). If you prefer to not discuss it in public, please make use of WP:UTRS. Huon (talk) 06:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry I asked

I explicitly noted that I'm an ignoramus about such things. Indeed, I asked for help. So, what do I get? A very threatening-sounding set of warnings!

"This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked."

and

"If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired." The last sentence sounds chilling. You're telling me that if I'm not careful I won't even be able to edit this page. Since I don't have a clue what I've done wrong and have no idea what I must avoid saying/doing even on this page now, all I can really do (safely) is to remain quiet. Okay. It doesn't help me, but at least I won't be hurting myself. Gaussgauss (talk) 09:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry if the standard text of the template might sound intimidating, but it's not personally aimed at you and you have done no wrong in appealing this block, so don't worry about being stopped from editing this page. It seems you have been caught in an IP block - that's a block on an IP address (which is an underlying number that is used for internet connections) - and we cannot help you if we do not know what that number is. When you try to edit, the message you get should tell you your IP address, so please tell us that number (it will be of the form 123.456.789.123). But be aware that revealing your IP address will reveal something about your geographic location (the accuracy depending on your country and your internet provider), so if you think you might not want to disclose it publicly, please follow the instructions at WP:UTRS and it will be dealt with confidentially. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and yes, the problem might indeed be because you use HOLA - can you try again without using HOLA and let us know if that works? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much! In fact, as I wondered, and as you suspected as well, it does seem to be a 'HOLA effect'. WIth HOLA on, I am not allowed to edit. With it off, though, I'm off to the races and can edit without limit. I really appreciate you taking the time and making the effort to respond as you did. In particular, I found your words of reassurance exactly that - reassuring. In other words, although the loss of editing privileges was one thing, receiving what I interpreted as threatening and intimidating messages was quite another. Your response regarding the latter was a huge help. Thank you! Gaussgauss (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. Because Wikipedia allows people to edit without creating an account, the use of various proxies, VPNs and anonymizing services would make it even harder to deal with persistent troublemakers. That's pretty much the only reason such services are blocked when found, though it can affect honorable editors too as you discovered. When I first started here I found the big coloured banners and the confusion of Wikipedia abbreviations pretty intimidating, and it's easy for us to forget how things can first appear to a new contributor - but most of us here are quite friendly and helpful really ;-) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gaussgauss. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gaussgauss. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gaussgauss. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! > Aha!

Hi. Er ... this – not quite the right chap. :) Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I think this gentleman might be the right bloke so I have added him in for you. Cheers! DBaK (talk) 08:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure I managed to do that - thanks for the help! Gaussgauss (talk)

No worries! You're v v welcome. Cheers DBaK (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
Citation details are important:
- Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
- Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
- Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
- Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!\
Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]