User talk:GMTV Chart Show

Fair use rationale for Image:Skylogo 1996.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Skylogo 1996.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sky1logo 1997.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sky1logo 1997.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sky2 ident1996.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sky2 ident1996.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sky1logo 1997.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sky1logo 1997.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Skylogo 1996.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Skylogo 1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Skylogo96.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Skylogo 1996.jpg. The copy called Image:Skylogo 1996.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:00, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Skylogo96.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Skylogo96.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sky1logo 1997.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sky1logo 1997.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during September 10 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Freeview page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AxG ^@ ^►talk 16:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during September 10 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to ABC1 (United Kingdom), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AxG ^@ ^►talk 16:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Stride

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Derek Stride, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.ccspitalfields.org/staff/derekstride. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 18:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Derek Stride

A tag has been placed on Derek Stride, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Bmg916^Speak 18:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Derek Stride. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 19:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Wacky Bodybuilders

A tag has been placed on The Wacky Bodybuilders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. AngelOfSadness talk 18:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Derek Stride

A tag has been placed on Derek Stride, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. AngelOfSadness talk 18:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Derek Stride, you will be blocked. AngelOfSadness talk 18:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of E-Male

A tag has been placed on E-Male requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. carelesshx _talk 17:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Holland (muscle man)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tony Holland (muscle man), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.maxalding.co.uk/holland/holland.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing Channel U, Fizz, Rockworld TV, and Clubland TV

I must ask you to stop vandalising the pages concerning the music channels Channel U, Fizz, Rockworld TV, and Clubland TV. They have not been bought by Fox, they will not be rebranded, I cannot find any news source anywhere, so please stop persisting with this fantasy of yours. No such business has taken place, nor have any announcements been made. You obviously don't seem to understand the website editing rules, so stop this vandalism now. If you make edits like this you have to provide a source by putting a website address linking a news article. Kieranthompson

March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Spice Girls, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 19:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Box Television on Virgin Media

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, some of your recent edits, such as the ones you made to The Box, The Hits, Smash Hits, Kerrang!, Q, Kiss, Magic TV and List of channels on Virgin TV did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasmeet 181 (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of channels on Sky Digital in the UK and Ireland‎, you will be blocked from editing. —HMR 15:54, 05 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during April 7 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AxG ^@ ^►talk 20:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GMTV Chart Show (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason offered— FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GMTV Chart Show (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

"I Want CSC Media Group to be get brought out by NBC Universal" is not a reason for you to be unblocked. I agree with Liempt's comments below that you are sailing very close to a much longer block. Address the reason you were blocked and explain how you are going to modify your behavior to meet Wikipedia's rules. Further frivolous or irrelevant unblock requests will not be tolerated. Gwernol 11:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain why you wish to be unblocked, with an eye for addressing the reasons for the block and convincing us they no longer apply. – Luna Santin (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Want CSC Media Group to be get brought out by NBC Universal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GMTV Chart Show (talk • contribs)

Perhaps the user is looking for an even longer ban? With frivolous unban requests and blatant lying about his IP address and it's usage, it sure seems like it to me. --Liempt (talk) 11:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thames TV "Classic" (and Syco TV and Paranormal Channel AND Talk Network)

Page got deleted. Cite your sources. SOURCE OR DIE! Malpass93 (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What part of, SOURCE OR DIE! Don't you understand!? HMR 19:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As above. STOP IT! Malpass93 (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you naive little kid....HMR 21:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe I am saying this but, there will be a Paranormal Channel, Yvette Fielding announced it on the Paul O'Grady Show. I have yet to find an online source though. -- [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 20:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to List of channels on Sky Digital in the UK and Ireland, you will be blocked from editing. [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 17:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of channels on Virgin TV, you will be blocked from editing. Jasmeet 181 (talk) 20:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of channels on Sky Digital in the UK and Ireland, you will be blocked from editing. Including your edit to Syco TV [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 22:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big Three news anchors

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Big Three news anchors, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fabrictramp (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Big Three news anchors

I have nominated Big Three news anchors, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Three news anchors. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fabrictramp (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Channel 349, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 00:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 20:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do everyone a favour and leave wikipedia until you can come back and edit articles with reliable sources. Hardly any of your edits have not been undone so your wasting your time because claims must be backed up with sources, you can't just expect everyone to just take your word for it and beleive it's ture. Regards AceLinkOccassional (talk) 15:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Talk:BoxTelevision.co.uk"

A page you created, Talk:BoxTelevision.co.uk, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Test pages.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 15:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GET LOST

ALL YOUR EDITS ARE REVERTED FOR A REASON ITS ALL UNSOURCED RUBBISH SOURCE IT AND IT WILL STAY DON'T SOURCE IT AND YOU'LL JUST BE WASTING YOUR TIME STILL STOP REVERTING THE EDITS BACK BECAUSE YOUR EDITS WILL JUST BE REMOVED AGAIN UNTIL YOU CAN PROVIDE A RELIABLE SOURCE, SO STOP WASTING YOUR TIME

administrator please block him —Preceding unsigned comment added by AceLink (talk • contribs) 15:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMPORTANT

please stop reverting the edits of those repected users on wikipeida your informatio is unsourced and there may be evidence of the information not posibly been able to be true. This is located on the talk page reverting my edits is getting you no where because your unsourced material will not be tollerated. instead, discuss this on the talk page of the article fro boxtelevision.co.uk and you might get somewhere regards smiley_:) (talk) 21:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of BoxTelevision.co.uk

A tag has been placed on BoxTelevision.co.uk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tan | 39 16:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BoxTelevision.co.uk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. GMTV Chart Show (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been deleted so there is nothing to protect. Also, this is the wrong place to request page protection (see WP:RFPP). Also given that there was not a single IP edit to that article, why would you believe it needed protecting? Gwernol 18:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked...

You have a long editing pattern that appears to be largely disruptive. I have indefinitely blocked this account following this report (though I don't necessarily think the report was a good one). I have watchlisted this page, so please feel free to respond here with any information that explains why you have repeat instances of warnings, blocks, and page deletions...any unblock template should probably address the seemingly constant concerns over your unsourced additions to Wikipedia.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

— Scientizzle 16:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]