User talk:G0rf

Nomination of TowIt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TowIt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TowIt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 02:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 11:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

G0rf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

g0rf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did not know of this rule. My apologies. Typically I would utilize the username "gorf" with a fallback of "gorfed" and in this case both usernames were previously taken on Wikipedia. "gorfednet" is my typical tertiary fallback username and I had no malicious intent when registering the account. Gorfednet (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

New name seems fine, renamed and unblocked, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Paid editing

Hello G0rf. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:G0rf. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=G0rf|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. agtx 22:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

• I am not paid for these contributions. I am however connected to the "company" (incorporated only for liability purposes) and want the story/history to be made public as I feel an injustice was served for what was a good intention. It should be noted that the application was created for free, and was offered to the city of Toronto (and world) for free and has never received compensation of any kind. See "I am offering the police a free solution, with no cost to them and no cost to the taxpayers, that is just going to make them more efficient, which in turn will save them or make them more money, so I can’t understand why they would say no to such a thing unless they are against innovation.". The application was made purely to help better humanity. It should be noted that your apparent negative bias towards this subject could also represent a COI. Perhaps you could be personally impacted through the existence of the application, or have a financial interest in a related industry?
  • No. agtx 23:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, G0rf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)