User talk:Frysun
Speedy deletion nomination of Sun Baoguo
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sun Baoguo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 17:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation
[edit]Hello, Frysun. When you changed Kulja into a disambiguation page, you may have overlooked WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:
- A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix all resulting mis-directed links.
- Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.
It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Kulja" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
United Front article and interwiki links
[edit]Hello! I have undone your edit to the United Front (People's Republic of China) article because you removed many valid interwiki links; I assume this was an accident. Did you mean to only update the Chinese interwiki link? Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 19:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
I see you moved the article Khorgas to Khorgos and then failed to even clean up the article, leaving article name as Khorgas. Your rationale given was that there are more Google results for Khorgos than Khorgas, however this is an inaccurate representation in this case because Khorgos is the town on the Kazakhstan side of the border, while Khorgas is the correct name on the Chinese side of the border. Unless you can present more evidence that the town's English name per WP:COMMONNAME is Khorgos, please reconsider this change. From this article by the Xinjiang Uyghur region government, it is referred to as Khorgas. Heights(Want to talk?) 23:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Name of the subway system in Seoul/Incheon/Ilsan...
[edit]Thank you for your input on what the proper name of the metro system should be. However please refrain from editing associated pages while a discussion about the name is ongoing. It is more polite to give you opinion and contribute to the discussion and wait for a consensus to be reached before mass changes occur. Thank you, ₪RicknAsia₪ 14:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the message. I noted that there has been a confusion for a long time. Seoul Subway (ko:서울 지하철) is a constituting part of Sudogwon Electric Railway (ko:수도권 전철-Literally translates into Capital Area Electric Railway). The Korean Wikipedia has always maintained two different pages for them while the English Wikipedia confused them with each other which have brought certain problems. I think the changes are correct and long overdue.--Frysun (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Frysun your changes are incorrect. The Korean Wikipedia maintains the two for historic purposes - not because they're two different systems. The Seoul Subway term is outdated and no longer used since 2000 when the system was unified under the Seoul Metropolitan Subway. Please see the discussion under List of metro systems article before making any more changes. Camins (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't want to conclude that you have been deliberately misleading. Seoul Subway is not defunct and it is part of, not the equivalent of, Sudogwon Electric Railway.
- It is defunct as a system - It exists only for revenue counting purpose by the Seoul government which owns Seoul Metro,SMRT and Line 9 - not because it is a separate system. You're right, it is part of the Seoul Metropolitan Subway, which is the accurate translation, not "Sudogwon electric railway" which you mention. Please see Seoul Metro's official English map, which reads "Metro lines in Seoul Metropolitan Area". None of the words of "Sudogwon Electric Railway" are mentioned there. Camins (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- And please stop vandalizing Seoul Metropolitan Subway's article - you redirected it to Seoul Metro, which is the name of the operator of 4 lines. You don't seem to understand that there exists only one single system in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Camins (talk) 15:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- I copied our discussions to the talk page of Sudogwon Electric Railway so that everybody can see. Let's continue there.--Frysun (talk) 15:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- If you can read Hangul as you say, why are you denying official dictionary translations, the official subway operators and maps? I don't understand. Camins (talk) 17:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- I copied our discussions to the talk page of Sudogwon Electric Railway so that everybody can see. Let's continue there.--Frysun (talk) 15:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- And please stop vandalizing Seoul Metropolitan Subway's article - you redirected it to Seoul Metro, which is the name of the operator of 4 lines. You don't seem to understand that there exists only one single system in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Camins (talk) 15:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- It is defunct as a system - It exists only for revenue counting purpose by the Seoul government which owns Seoul Metro,SMRT and Line 9 - not because it is a separate system. You're right, it is part of the Seoul Metropolitan Subway, which is the accurate translation, not "Sudogwon electric railway" which you mention. Please see Seoul Metro's official English map, which reads "Metro lines in Seoul Metropolitan Area". None of the words of "Sudogwon Electric Railway" are mentioned there. Camins (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't want to conclude that you have been deliberately misleading. Seoul Subway is not defunct and it is part of, not the equivalent of, Sudogwon Electric Railway.
- Frysun your changes are incorrect. The Korean Wikipedia maintains the two for historic purposes - not because they're two different systems. The Seoul Subway term is outdated and no longer used since 2000 when the system was unified under the Seoul Metropolitan Subway. Please see the discussion under List of metro systems article before making any more changes. Camins (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seoul Subway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)