User talk:Fiskje88
Welcome!
|
Articles for deletion/Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan: Request for examples of significant coverage
[edit]Hi. You recently voted "keep" in the discussion @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan. Please note that there is no specific notability guideline for "oldest person," and any reliance on such a guideline or presumed precedent is misplaced. All such "oldest persons" must satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG, as well as other suitability guidelines such as WP:NOPAGE, in order to have a stand-alone article. You are respectfully requested to please provide links to what you believe are the three best examples of significant coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources per GNG, so other editors may evaluate whether such persons are notable. Thank you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/153.151.83.197, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Dear all, I have had two busy days at work, and only now have I read this notification. I don't quite understand why I am under investigation for sockpuppetry; I do not own/have any other account, nor have I asked others to do anything for me or help me out in any way. I would like to point out that my account has existed longer than most others who were accused of sockpuppetry (if not the longest of all). On top of that, an IP check would have easily shown that all these different accounts edit Wikipedia from different countries, proving we are all unique editors who simply edit a lot in the same topics.Fiskje88 (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion review for Kane Tanaka
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)