User talk:Farquard

Welcome!

Hello, Farquard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 03:04, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Mount Royal

Standard has it that the federal district does not need further diambiguation. When the provincial district article is created than it will be at Mount Royal (provincial electoral district). -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:48, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's just that the federal ridings are more important :-). Remember, other provinces have ridings with the same names, so this has been discussed before. For example, the federal riding of Prince Albert is at Yorkton (electoral district) while the provincial riding is at Yorkton (provincial electoral district). -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:56, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's an unwritten standard that most of us agree on. I've tried looking for past discussions on the issue, but can't find it yet. I know there was one though! -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:00, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, me and Fawcett had this discussion in April. See it at his talk page here User_talk:Fawcett5/Archive2 and on my talk page (look for April 30) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hull

This is more than just Hull, and I will say separation from the rest of the city has very little to do with it. I hate to say this so many times, but it's what the maps say. And we can source maps, at least. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:33, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Search the wiki for similar surveys, and set it up like that. But I reckon, someone neutral on the subject should start it, as it is very biased as it is. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:09, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Launie Anderssohn

Hi Farquard,

Frankly, I cannot remember if I counted your vote, but I fear that I did not, in which case I apologize. You're right that I should have.

I might not have closed the VfD if it was 4-2; however, apart from the 4 clear delete votes, I also count the nomination as a delete vote, and in the discussion at the bottom of the page there's another valid delete by Blackcap. So it's 6 to 2, and that is a clear consensus to delete. -- Eugene van der Pijll 10:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ballparks

I see you're adding a section on former ballparks. Kudos! Now, a suggestion... I like to keep things simple. When teams built new structures on existing sites, they often renamed the park or dated the park from the construction date. In my view, that's marketing hype. Example: Tiger Stadium, which is typically dated from 1912, except when it's convenient, like when they were getting ready to leave, and tried to pump up attendance by talking about "Baseball at the Corner since 1896". Well, whatever they want to call it, Bennett Park or Navin Field or Briggs Stadium or Tiger Stadium, it's all the same block of land, and I think it should be listed as a single site, 1896-1999. Another example is the South End Grounds, which was the Braves' home from 1871 through 1914, no matter how many times they rebuilt it or burned it and gave it different names. Similarly, the Polo Grounds, whose diamond stayed in the same place while they rebuilt around it. They dated it from 1911, but the right date should be 1890. And the Crosley Field site, which the Reds occupied from 1884 or some such through part of 1970. Anyway, that's my view. I'd be interested in hearing your view on it. d:) Wahkeenah 00:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I contend that they should not have separate articles. Those early ballpark articles tend to be small, because there is little to be said about them. I did combine the so-called "Philadelphia Baseball Grounds", a small article, into the "Baker Bowl" article, and then redirected the former to the latter. That's how I think all these old structures should be handled. Wahkeenah 02:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If it depends on the location of the diamond, you could indeed argue that Tiger Stadium is a different ballpark from Bennett Park; that Redland-Crosley Field is a different park from Palace of the Fans; etc. Yet you've got Sportsman's Park as the home of the Cardinals during the 1880s and from 1920-1966, and of the Browns from 1902-1953, when in fact the diamond was in the southeast corner during the 1880s, the northwest corner during the early 1900s, and the southwest corner from 1908 onward. But the name was not changed, so the three "different ballparks" tend to be regarded as one. Meanwhile, if you've seen photos of the Reds' 1880s ballpark, they actually retained the original grandstand on the southeast corner as a right field pavilion when they built their "Palace of the Fans" and relocated the diamond to the southwest corner. Yet some sources regard them as different ballparks, even though the very same thing was done in St. Louis in 1908. The Reds replaced the entire structure in 1912, of course, the year from which they tended to date their ballpark. Meanwhile, the Indians, Giants and Senators used to date League Park, Polo Grounds and Griffith Stadium respectively from 1910, 1911 and 1911 again because that's when the concrete structures were built, even though the location of the diamond did not change from the earlier structures... and in the case of the first two, the name did not change either. It's these kinds of inconsistences that can be resolved by simply going by location, and reporting these chronological details within the article, rather than going by position of the diamond, naming, or whatever hype the club wanted to use (or not use) at some time or another. Wahkeenah 08:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let me ask you this: You have listed the Polo Grounds as 1890-1957, but you have listed Griffith Stadium as 1911 onward. Yet, in both cases, the diamond stayed in place while they rebuilt the structure around it. Is that not an inconsistent approach? Wahkeenah 18:20, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you already did it. OK, now a little bit of a history lesson... The Senators played at a different location, called American League Park, during 1901-02 or 03 or some such. Then they moved into an older site, which was once called National Park (the team having been called the Nationals) and it became Griffith Stadium at some point on or after it was rebuilt in concrete. Also, regarding Baltimore, the minor league Orioles stopped playing at the earlier Oriole Park after the 1915 season and moved into the abandoned Federal League facility, Terrapin Park, which was right across the street, in 1916. They renamed it as a newer Oriole Park. When it burned in mid-1944, they moved into Municipal Stadium, a football stadium which was laid out kind of like the diamond in the L.A. Coliseum later, with a short left field and a deep right field. The diamond was in the northwest "corner" of the field of the horseshoe-shaped stadium, whose open end was to the south. The structure was rebuilt as Memorial Stadium in the late 1940s. They actually built the new stadium in sections around the ballfield during the season, starting at the south end and slowly obliterating the previous stadium, until the new horseshoe, with its open end to the north, was sufficiently ready for them to relocate the diamond from the northwest corner to its final location at the south end of the new oval. Got that mental picture? :) Wahkeenah 18:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty good. I corrected the end-year on the early Oriole Park. If anyone wonders what happened with the minor league O's during 1916-44, they'll find out all about it on the Memorial Stadium page. I'm guessing you don't really want to get into lists of the Federal League Parks for the most part, or the many extinct teams of the 19th century, but just the linear histories of the current teams. Wahkeenah 19:03, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Launie Anderssohn

hello this is in accordance with laune anderssohn. i play in the band and have been playing with a notable rock band, the dears who are hugely successfull in not only north america but europe as well, playing to crowds of over 100 000 people at festivals, www.thedears.org for any info on validity. this is a notable group people, we are a band making waves and spreading rapidly, yet it seems the dears factor, the keep posts, the 2 countrieds toured, the three re cords, the 800 plus hits on google, the records in radio stations across canada dont seem to matter in the voting process even thoughwe met all the criteria for being kept. this bearcat fellow does not seem to have any notability under his belt. yet he is still on this site, we are a hard working ground breaking band that has been deleted for what i believe is more the content of our music than the actual suggested reasons. please consider us for undeletion (65.94.191.240 03:53, 30 August 2005 (UTC))thank you --65.94.191.240 03:53, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

nice work!

thanks for creating List of most common Major League Baseball post-season matchups!! Kingturtle 18:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. JoaoRicardo^talk 04:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Villemarie.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Villemarie.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Admrboltz (T | C) 22:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Villeraystmichel.png

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villeraystmichel.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrboltz (T | C) 22:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nat'l. baseball teams

Shouldn't it really be South Korean national baseball team and Japanese national baseball team? I think that would be much better style.--ThreeAnswers 05:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stleonard.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Stleonard.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Stlaurent.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Stlaurent.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Steanne.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Steanne.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Montreal East

You say that Montreal East is the most common name in English. I say it's Montréal-Est. How do we resolve? I don't think I've heard anyone call it Montreal East, (except perhaps those over the age of retirment who still call Deux-Montagne, "Lake of Two Mountains", de la Montagne "Mountain Street" and Trois-Rivieres "Three Rivers"; or those who have never stepped foot in the place).

Normally I'd say, what do English people living in Montreal East currently call it ... but I've never met any! Or what does the town/city itself call itself in English ... but I don't think it operates in English. Have you any good references? All I can suggest is Google, that finds about 30,000 hits for "Montreal East" and 40,000 or so for Montreal-Est (both when restricting searches to English-language pages). Nfitz 23:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Beaconsfieldbaiedurfe.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Beaconsfieldbaiedurfe.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 11:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Anjou.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Anjou.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Tawker 00:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Anjou.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Anjou.png. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 13:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ilebizardstegenesteanne.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ilebizardstegenesteanne.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 04:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cotestluchampstead.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cotestluchampstead.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zsinj^Talk 01:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ilenotredame.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ilenotredame.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:38, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ddoroxboro.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ddoroxboro.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 14:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Verdun.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Verdun.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 18:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Dorvaliledorval.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dorvaliledorval.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 23:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ilestehelene.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ilestehelene.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Southwest.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Southwest.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 20:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Rosemontptepatrie.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosemontptepatrie.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Lasalle.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lasalle.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 13:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Montrealnorth.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Montrealnorth.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 20:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Nunsisland.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nunsisland.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 18:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Pierrefondsseneville.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pierrefondsseneville.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 01:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Montréal

Hi Farquard. I would like to ask you if you could upload the files Dollard.png and Hampstead.png in Commons. I've written the articles concerning these two Canadian towns in Catalan Wikipedia and it would be greatful to be able to use these two maps. Thank you so much --Manu bcn 21:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rdppatmtle.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rdppatmtle.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 03:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Farquard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Daniel Quinn (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of most common Major League Baseball postseason matchups for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most common Major League Baseball postseason matchups is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most common Major League Baseball postseason matchups until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Staxringold _talk^contribs 20:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cotestluc.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cotestluc.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Montrealeast.png

The file File:Montrealeast.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pointeclaire.png

The file File:Pointeclaire.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Pointe-Claire.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Baiedurfe.png

The file File:Baiedurfe.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality, superseded by File:Carte localisation Île de Montréal - Baie-D'Urfé.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]