User talk:FOBioPatel
License tagging for Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
You may add to
[edit]You may add links of news of wrongs of Swadhyay Parivar but pl. do not remove other external links.Swadhyayee 23:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:IndianCow" here</math>
Someone commented on...
[edit]I think you have a mis understanding here....I am not trying to remove any of the external or content....External links / references only add value to the article..Some sock puppets, vandals and users like you are deleting information [3]I don't know you if you are also a supporter of Didi...
I can't understand as to why you are deleting content related to Vinu Sancharia and Pankaj Trivedi.. The content that I had added had reference and notes... I think this issue needs to be reported to admins....
The above comments are un-signed.
This is wikipedia. The article has to be neutral and not a platform for venting venom against anyone or wrongfully glorifying any person or organisation. Certainly this forum is not for supporters of Didi or of anti-Didi people. Someone while adding contents remove external links being documentary evidence of wrongs of Swadhyay.
I feel the article should be allowed to remain with caution like controversy and Pankaj Trivedi incident. There may be thousands of things wrong in recent times, if someone try to incorporate every wrong, the article will be ugly and create bad impression of editors and dis-interest viewers.
You may check all my edits and you will come to know that Pankaj Trivedi as well controversy has been incorporated by me. Pl. consider to be contended with some amount of caution. Further adding of wrongs will make the article one sided and defamatory. Such thing will lead to further editors fight and people will remove all cautionary links and glorify Dada, Didi or Swadhyay Parivar.
I have been able to convince the other editors of wrongs of Swadhyay Parivar and so the page is reverted back to my edit the moment someone remove "controversy" and "Pankaj Trivedi" incident.
If someone make the article defamatory and one sided, all the cautionary notes might be removed.
Swadhyayee 03:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Swadhyayee, please be advised my edits are always from a NPOV, and I'm working with you to prevent vandalism such as the wrongful glorification of the Swadhyay Parivar organization.
FOBioPatel 13:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
ZIP Files[edit]As per WP:EL - please don't add links to EXE or ZIP files on Wikipedia. Thanks Heligoland 22:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |