User talk:Emerson-sheik

October 2012

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lugia2453 (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone was changed by Emerson-sheik (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961657 on 2012-10-01T02:29:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]