User talk:Editoneer/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Editoneer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Botanophila lobata has been accepted

Botanophila lobata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vlad Vasile Voiculescu (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. </nowiki>The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Looks like a language barrier issue or stuff lost in translation. But majority of the article is hard to follow. I would recommend visiting the teahouse if you need help with grammar cleanup.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vlad Vasile Voiculescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vlad Vasile Voiculescu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stylidium schoenoides has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stylidium schoenoides. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinguicula antarctica has been accepted

Pinguicula antarctica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bennv3771 (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vlad Vasile Voiculescu has been accepted

Vlad Vasile Voiculescu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andi Moisescu (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. </nowiki>The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andi Moisescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andi Moisescu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andi Moisescu (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. </nowiki>The reason left by Willbb234 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources you have provided are not reliable; the first is a primary reference, whilst the other two come from a non-reputable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andi Moisescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andi Moisescu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andi Moisescu (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A single source is not suitable for an entire article about a WP:BLP

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andi Moisescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andi Moisescu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarracenia naczii has been accepted

Sarracenia naczii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 05:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Romanian historical films has been accepted

List of Romanian historical films, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amjad Saqib (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Amjad Saqib may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 21:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Romania

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Romania has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I would suggest that you go through the sections in the article on the Economy, Infrastructure and Demographics and try to update any older statistics if possible.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh my god, I never saw so much dedication especially that you put references in there, thank you so much! The Romanian WikiProject would be proud.(Or atleast amazed). Editoneer (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

You're very welcome. It it is straight forward, sometimes it is just easier to look up the information, find a citation and fix it. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

Thank you for your detailed and extensive review. I have addressed your issues but may still need to add on some more citations especially for the recipes and so on. Will continue to work on it throughout the next few days, best regardsJJNito197 (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Um, you could just write a response on the GA talk page, but anyways thank you. Editoneer (talk) 05:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romania

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Romania you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 22:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Romania

Hello:

I see that you have asked for another copy edit of the article Romania. It appears from your request that you expect the editor to fix all of the questions the reviewer has about the article's content. That is not what we do at the Guild of Copy Editors. In my earlier note to you I suggested that the article needed updating and the GA reviewer has found other issues with the article's content which need to be addressed. I would suggest that your request for a copy edit is premature until all of the content issues are addressed.

If you agree, you can withdraw your request on the Guild's Request page.

Best wishes moving forward with the article.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC).

Thanks anyways. Editoneer (talk) 08:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

History of Romania

Hello, Editoneer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for History of Romania at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Editoneer, I've done the requested c/e but the article is a long way from Good Article status. In particular it lack references so I've added some templates to mark these sections and help you find some useful sources. There is also no lead (top) section, which should summarise the article's content but should not include information that does not exist in the main body. Anyway, i've done the best I can with the article; good luck with your planned GA nomination. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Editoneer (talk) 07:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Articles may be submitted for this as well as the regional Challenge you usually contribute to at the same time. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 19:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I know that you invited me because you found me on the Europe article challenge, but I don't have a credit card, thanks anyways. Editoneer (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristian Teodorescu (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, the broken english needs to be cleaned up

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cristian Teodorescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cristian Teodorescu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cristian Teodorescu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cristian Teodorescu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergiu Andon

Sergiu Andon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerhardt Daniel Țuchel (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Having a scandal on Wikipedia does not make one notable. Neither does having a Facebook page, or a non-scandal about changing one's name. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerhardt Daniel Țuchel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gerhardt Daniel Țuchel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 23:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andi Moisescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andi Moisescu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 09:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Google Romania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Google Romania, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 08:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romania

The article Romania you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Romania for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kubeti.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kubeti.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Lebanese cuisine/GA1

Editoneer, what is delaying the completion of your GA review here? You requested a second opinion and got one, and I'm not sure what else you're looking for from the article or the nominator. Did you want someone to actually finish the review for you and/or make the final decision? The review has been open for about four months; it's time to actively work toward completing it or to hand it on to someone else who will do that task. Thank you for your work to date. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

It has been over a month since your last post to the review. I'm hoping you'll return soon, but if not, I'll ask the second-opinion editor to conclude the review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

I apologise if I caused any trouble, I forgot about Wikipedia. Editoneer (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

The Hatchet (novel)

Hello, Editoneer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Hatchet (novel) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! But, in all honesty, I had not seen your request (I think this was done on a page that I don't follow, I should try to find out how that works), but rather, The Hatchet page popped up on my watchlist yesterday (I had made the second edit on it, back in January 2007), and I got interested in it again after all these years. I was surprised to see User:Baffle gab1978 was also editing at the same time, but somehow we managed not to get into edit conflicts. At any rate, maybe the page can still be improved, I think there is still room for growth there. Turgidson (talk) 14:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Seems weird to me that they didn't warn you about that and thank you anyways. There's indeed room for improvement there, for example, this novel is being taught in 8th grade in Romania. And there's more details in the book but I don't have that. So what do I do in this situation? Editoneer (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

One possibility would be to have a section on "Legacy", where one could discuss in more detail the cultural impact of the novel (movie, radio drama, etc), as well as the tidbit that I found fascinating while researching this subject – the references in the novel to "Crucea Talienilor" and "Drumul Talienilor" that I figured out came from those Italian stonemasons who built a cross in 1914 at the top of the mountain pain that Lipan traverses. It turns out that the cross was destroyed in fighting right after August 23, 1944, but a picture that I added to the article still remains; also, the road itself is now named colloquially after Lipan (according to sources). I put a bit of this in the captions for the pics, but really most of that should go in the text, with some added references. Finally, and perhaps more importantly, there ought to be a section on literary criticism and/or appreciation of the novel, philosophical meaning, how it fits in Sadoveanu's opus and Romanian literature at large, etc. A lot to do... Turgidson (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I suppose after those changes I can also check for peer reviews and thank you. Also if you're interested in the Romanian culture, you're most welcomed in the Wikiproject Romania. Editoneer (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations \| January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)