User talk:Dung247

Welcome

Hello, Dung247, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Dung247, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 10:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Kunalforyou. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to WWJ (AM) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ЖunalForYou (☎️|✍) 15:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a program guide, nor a phone book

I have reverted certain edits of yours which violate WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, WP:NOTTVGUIDE, WP:NOTWHITE & WP:NOTYELLOW. Please review these Wikipedia policies. I know you were probably unfamiliar with these.Stereorock (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to WBZ (AM)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to WYAY

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, WYAY, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at WSB (AM), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 18:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

KQV

added a link pointing to WINS

List of news channels

added a link pointing to News 12

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to WINS (AM) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 17:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an online program guide

For the 2nd time, please read Wikipedia's policy that it is not an online program guide per WP:NOTDIR(4) (WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, WP:NOTTVGUIDE). This includes program schedules and formatics (what element airs when) of radio/television stations.Stereorock (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at WINS (AM), you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

KNX (AM)

added links pointing to WCBS and KRLD

List of news television channels

added a link pointing to Indian language

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Radio stations stop all-news

added links pointing to WCBS, WBBM, WNEW, WINS, WTOP and WKQX

News 12 Traffic & Weather

added a link pointing to Westchester

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at WINS (AM). ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Radio stations stop all-news for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radio stations stop all-news is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio stations stop all-news until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC) 07:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radio stations stop all-news, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to CJOB, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Per WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE: "For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable." Please stop adding program listing information to radio station articles. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 12:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your KLIV edits

For the 3rd time from me, anything that gives a time for a format feature runs contrary to WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE. You appear to not have read it, or if you have, don't understand it or don't care what it says. Any program schedule or format clock runs contrary to WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE!Stereorock (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at WBBM (AM). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.
Per WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE: "For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable." Please stop adding program listing information to radio station articles. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 12:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at KOMO (AM). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ..repeat above. Please read WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE. Jeh (talk) 10:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Station not stream outside Canada/US for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Station not stream outside Canada/US is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Station not stream outside Canada/US until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jeh (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at KFRC-FM. Binksternet (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WSB (AM). BilCat (talk) 05:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WSB (AM). BilCat (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WAGA-TV. BilCat (talk) 12:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at KYW (AM). Your incessant wikifiddling on radio station articles - adding "program guide"-level info in spite of WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, adding unsourced information, trying to update the "slogan" (many stations use multiple "slogans") - is highly disruptive. Please stop. Jeh (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WAGA-TV. Your edits continue to violate WP:NOTTVGUIDE BilCat (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KNX (AM) & WTOP-FM

Your edits of both KNX (AM) & WTOP-FM violate WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, and this isn't the first time your edits have run afoul of that regulation (ditto WP:NOTTVGUIDE).Stereorock (talk) 22:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dung247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm so sorry for all the bad things that I have added. I also sorry BilCat, Stereorock, Gogo Dodo and Bbb23 because I have wrongly blamed you. I promise that I will hear your advice. But, for pages I have created, you should tell me things that you don't satisfied about it and I will redo to improve it. With me, editing Wikipedia is very good!

Decline reason:

Jeh has provided a very good explanation, below, and this request does not come close to addressing the problems that led to this block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: I am not an admin and have no power in this. What follows is my personal evaluation of your situation in general and your unblock request in particular.

You received an indefinite block not because of "bad things you added" but because you were abusing multiple accounts to evade your original block. Your unblock request thus shows that you don't understand the reason for your block. Given that, it's tough to see how you can promise better behavior, since you fail to understand what was wrong before.

However, there were definitely things you did wrong in addition to abusing multiple accounts. And "I'm sorry for everything I did wrong before" does not really cut it as either an apology or a promise of better behavior. Again, it doesn't show any awareness at all of what you did wrong before. You made minor edits, edits in volation of various policies and guidelines, to perhaps hundreds of articles and they will all have to be undone. You have thus made a great deal of work for other editors. We'd like to spend our time here making constructive additions, not fixing up others' mistakes.

As for the articles you created, they were frankly unsalvageable; otherwise they would have survived their deletion discussions. The very concepts of those articles were not supported by Wikipedia's purposes. No amount of changes to those articles could have fixed that. You would do well to review the deletion discussions. You should not create any more articles until you understand why those articles were deleted. Please also review WP:NOT.

Regarding the unblock request: Along with the repeated sockpuppetry (one would think that you would have gotten the hint after the fourth or fifth sock had been blocked) you have shown stubborn refusal to follow guidelines such as WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, not to mention policy such as WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOR. Given your near-obsessive zeal for editing radio station articles to add claims that violate some or all of the above, I propose that:

If this user's block is lifted, a community ban on editing all radio- and TV-related articles should be imposed. Jeh (talk) 07:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editors reviewing this situation might find this conversation from April 28 between Dung247 and myself, in which he asked for and received advice, to be of interest. - BilCat (talk) 13:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dung247, because you've refactored the declined unblock request twice, I've revoked your access to this page. You may appeal through WP:UTRS.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/dung247, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

BilCat (talk) 18:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Dung247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #15778 was submitted on May 14, 2016 00:15:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Dung247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #15785 was submitted on May 15, 2016 00:28:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm beginning to think this is a WP:CIR case. Jeh (talk) 02:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. - BilCat (talk) 03:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As do I. Stereorock (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dung247. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]