User talk:Dogman15/Archive 1

Archive for messages from 2007-2012

Past Warnings

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. JDoorj a m Talk 00:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Parthenogenesis, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 11:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Do these warnings ever expire? I mean, it's been like six months since that last message was put there, and being "blocked" from Wikipedia seems a little harsh. -dogman15 03:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Please refrain from blanking current warnings from this page. Thanks. --Yamla 02:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They're hardly "current" anymore. dogman15 (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

False Accusations

Regarding all of these messages, at no time whatsoever did I have any intention of vandalism. I love Wikipedia too much to do something like that. On these 2 (or 3: see here) occasions, I apologize for any minor damages I may have made. However, I did not believe that I was vandalising at the time. If there is a way that the Wikipedia community could forgive me for this, that would be appriciated. Thank You.
-dogman15 23:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(P.S. I don't even remember what that first one was anyway.)

Maybe you should hash encrypt your page or whatever they say when you log in or something like that. Jasonxu98 (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really not concerned about it anymore, but thank you for your suggestion. Hey! You're the guy who started the MIDIjam article, right? dogman15 (talk) 03:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Cough* Maybe....(woops 4 dots I meant ...Jasonxu98 (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Locked Open

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks!--Vox Causa 22:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relient K

Hey, just a head's up I keep on unwiki-linking the Sadie Hawkin's Dance in the Relient K article because it references what a Sadie Hawkin's Dance is not the song. Giving you a heads up why I am going to revert it back.--DJREJECTED 21:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalization vs. nationalisation

Welcome, and thank you for correcting spelling on Wikipedia! However, both spellings of the word you "corrected" are acceptable.

Please familiarize yourself with American and British English spelling differences before making further spelling corrections to articles. Wikipedia has 48,271,103 registered users on this English Wikipedia. These editors use different versions of English including American English and British English. The list of dialects of the English language goes on and on.

When many styles are acceptable, avoid changing from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change. It is acceptable to change from American spelling to British spelling only if the article concerns a British topic or vice versa or if you are making the article internally consistent.

More information is available at Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Enjoy your time on the encyclopedia. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American imperialist. Learn to (expletive) spell properly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.208.49 (talk • contribs) 03:22, February 15, 2007

Please note that the above rude comment was not from me, despite the anon's attempt to forge my signature. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Josiah. I didn't know about that particular British spelling rule. :) -dogman15 21:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also

I was about to put a link to my dad's new DJ website, but then I thought I shouldn't because that would be advertising. Just thought I'd say so. (Never mind.) 235,711

Thanks a lot!

Thanks a lot for signing my autograph page. It's now one of my three treasured autographs. A•N•N•Afoxlove r PLEASE SIGN HERE, ANYONE! 03:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leak Less

While I appreciate you trying to clean up this article a bit (for example with the infobox) - you adding "^really?" to the end of a citation template is considered vandalism. I won't give you an official warning since your other edit was in relatively good faith, but consider this a warning of a warning.Daniel()Folsom |\^T/|\_C/|\^U/|⁽^{Can you help me with my signature?}⁾ 12:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was (more or less, along the lines of): "Is a citation really needed for this?" I made the "really" in superscript so it would be known I was referring to the "{{cite}}". As I look back on this event, I realize that the talk page would've been a better place to put this.

Here is what that page looked like then:

"Very minor. The character is only seen in two scenes of varying importance. He is first seen having his tires changed, and then is seen in the crash.^{[citation needed]}^really?"

-- dogman15 03:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanBot's Triple Posts

Image tagging for Image:DJ_the_Scion_xB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DJ_the_Scion_xB.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Snot_Rod_the_Plymouth_Barracuda.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Snot_Rod_the_Plymouth_Barracuda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Wingo_the_Nissan_Silvia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wingo_the_Nissan_Silvia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned Images: Say Goodbye!

(Dumb bots. They don't know a good picture when they see one...)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mario_Andretti.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mario_Andretti.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 02:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hamm_Car.jpg

I have tagged Image:Hamm_Car.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 18:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also tagged today as {{orphaned fairuse}}:

~ Bigr Tex 18:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dark Red Ramone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dark Red Ramone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blue Ramone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue Ramone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sallycarrera.jpg

Hello, Dogman15. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Sallycarrera.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Dogman15. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cars Characters

It's sad that the Wikipedia community thinks that most of the Cars characters should not even be mentioned, not even have a picture. If you go to Answers.com, though, you'll find an archived version of the List of Cars characters article, with all the pictures that I uploaded to it. dogman15 14:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Octane Gain.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Octane Gain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Apple iMac Car.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apple iMac Car.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mood Springs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mood Springs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Van and Minnie.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Van and Minnie.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RPM 64.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RPM 64.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Clutch Aid.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch Aid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bumper Save.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bumper Save.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Leakless 52.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Leakless 52.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nitroade 28.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nitroade 28.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:No Stall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:No Stall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Holstein Heifer Chewall Tractor.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Holstein Heifer Chewall Tractor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Red (Cars).JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Red (Cars).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wheel_Well.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wheel_Well.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. At this point, I don't know if I care anymore. I wish I did, though. -dogman15 03:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cars is a good film, and you know it!

Orphaned Images that never got deleted

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Old NSMB.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Old NSMB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This picture was and still is on the New Super Mario Bros. article. Bots, if you find an "orphaned" image, PLEASE make sure it really isn't being used in any articles before you bother me. I have better things to do on the internet in addition to Wikipedia, like Deviantart.com, the Internet Movie Database, and FanFiction.Net. (Oh, and don't forget SmashBros.com! -dogman15 03:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Olympic Race.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympic Race.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In actuality, this image did end up getting deleted. Whatever. The new picture at Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games article does a better job of showing all the Nintendo and Sega characters. -dogman15 03:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Barbie as Rapunzel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barbie as Rapunzel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Racing Doc Hudson.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Racing Doc Hudson.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Self

The music in Donkey Kong 64 was written by E. Fischer and Grant Kirkhope. dogman15 17:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Barbie as Rapunzel

An editor has nominated Barbie as Rapunzel, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie as Rapunzel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Animorphs 43 The Test.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Animorphs 43 The Test.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Old_NSMB.jpg

I have tagged Image:Old_NSMB.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Old_NSMB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Old_NSMB.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 03:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your messages on my talk page read as if they were written by a bot. I'm not going to go to all this trouble just to keep one perfectly okay image on Wikipedia. If you (singular or collectively) really want the image gone, then go ahead and delete it. It really isn't worth fighting for. As for where I got the picture, I honestly cannot remember. Now stop pestering me!! dogman15 (talk) 03:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Animorphs 43 The Test.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Animorphs 43 The Test.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of your edit at List of Pixar film references

See here for reasons: Talk:List_of_Pixar_film_references#Toy_Story_3. Manning (talk) 01:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Partly Cloudy (small).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Partly Cloudy (small).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 02:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I uploaded that image when Partly Cloudy had no image, but then someone uploaded the film's poster under a different filename. If they had kept the filename but uploaded a new version of it, this wouldn't be happening. I guess since it only shows Gus and Peck and no title, and because it isn't currently being used in the article (it wouldn't work in any other articles), it can (and probably should) be deleted. dogman15 (talk) 07:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Animusic

Thanks for catching my dropped stitch disambiguating Treble at Animusic. Much appreciated. Grafen (talk) 11:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! Was that a bot of some sort that made the edit? Are you the creator/owner/instigator? I don't really need an answer, but thanks for letting me know. dogman15 (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dogman15! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 197 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Donald Fullilove - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually not sure what to do in this situation. He is a real person, and he really was in all of those films, but does his article really have to be delted if the only available source is the Internet Movie Database? dogman15 (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Fredricksen

Please watch your tone when addressing editors. " Please get his name right, people. If you're going to create an article, make sure you're spelling its title correctly." is not an appropriate way to speak; at no point did you need to speak down to anyone, nor did you need to say anything more than "fixing name." You could have observed that Carl Frederickson was the redirect created for the character's name, and his "real name" had no redirect, instead of assuming that I had "gotten the name wrong". - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The text of my edit summary was composed at nearly the same exact time as when you were making your edits. At the time, I did not pay attention to who the editor was. I saw that it was you after attempting to move the page. What stopped me was that it said the title I was moving to was already in use. This is probably a good example of an edit conflict. You'll notice that I directed my statement to no one in particular ("people"). I'm sorry for offending you (I can sense your emotion seething through your text), but I hope we can forget about this. Have a nice day! dogman15 (talk) 06:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Toothless is male"?

On what basis? I've undone your edit [1] pending a source.--John (talk) 15:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a passage that already exists (and existed) in the plot summary, and I quote it here: "Toothless hears Hiccup's screams and rushes to save him. He quickly overpowers the dragon, the Vikings sent to capture him, and finally Stoick." In addition, Hiccup explicitly refers to Toothless (with Astrid) as male in the film. Calling Toothless and "it" totally goes against what the film's message of "dragons are not ferocious". I could go on, but I won't. I'm reverting to male pronouns. dogman15 (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a source, and neither is your recollection of the dialog. Can you provide a reliable source for your contention? --John (talk) 00:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At one minute and ten seconds into this video, Chris Sanders, the director of How to Train Your Dragon, refers to Toothless as "him". He says "That's where the design of Toothless and his behaviors and everything about him came from." (And before you point it out, I'll say this now: Shortly after talking about Toothless as "he" and "him", Chris Sanders talks about Night Furies in general, using the pronouns "it" and "they". This is not specifically Toothless.) Please stop. This is like asking if WALL-E is male or not. No one in that film refers to the title character by a pronoun, yet everyone in the film and in the real world agrees that he's male, despite being a robot. Toothless is (in the film's world) a living breathing creature with a definite gender. Besides, how would one cite spoken word in a film that's still in theaters? A timecode? The DVD isn't out yet. dogman15 (talk) 00:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is a source of sorts, thanks. Next time, maybe we can have this discussion on the talk page, or you could just add the ref yourself. I am very keen to prevent How to Train Your Dragon from becoming a cruft collection, and eliminating anthropomorphism which is merely original research is a big part of that on a film like this. But I accept the evidence you have submitted on the issue of the gender of the dragon, even though it isn't really the best of sources, it'll do for now I think. Thanks again, --John (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Story 3 plot removal (before it turns into a revert war :) )

Hi, Dogman15 - The citations for the plot section do not support the plot section as it is written. The IGN article only discusses one scene where Andy's mother throws out the toys by accident and Woody attempts a rescue (and mentions the existence of a few other characters by name), and the WSJ article only mentions the day care center in passing. Neither mentions any information that are present in the last 4 paragraphs (or even the last half of the first paragraph). Unless you can find citations for that stuff, it is original research until reliable sources post plot information. Kjl (talk) 20:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I've seen the first 70 minutes of the film, and I know for a fact that the plot as given was accurate (though incomplete), I'll leave this alone for now... reluctantly. If people want the plot summary up to the cutoff point, they can go to the Pixar Wiki's article on Toy Story 3. dogman15 (talk) 00:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please start a page for me called Gertrude Friedberg

(It's a real person, lots of content, blabla) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.129.194 (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who? Get some sources and do it yourself. You've already left this same message on at least two other users' pages. And why call this person an "it"? Are they male or female? I don't care if they're real or not; ficional characters can have articles if they're notable enough. "Lots of content"? Where? Please don't bother me about this. dogman15 (talk) 05:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pixar shorts and Cars Toons

Reminder: you just added two Cars Toons entries without cites. Jordan Brown (talk) 05:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've added them, thanks. Jordan Brown (talk) 18:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:INiS logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:INiS logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike most of my picture uploads, I'm happy to see this one go. I've been wanting someone to make an SVG of it for some time, and now someone has. I say good riddance to that PNG! It still exists at the malnurished iNiS Wiki, so I'm not worried. Thanks for letting me know about that. dogman15 (talk) 08:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Thank you for the SVG

Sure, no problem. I'm always happy to help and vectorize (although text is not my forte.) I just made an SVG PFE logo for you, but it isn't perfect and you shouldn't try to pretend that it is; I'm no professional."User:Nicky Nouse" is not a valid HTML tag. See Help:HTML in wikitext.
03:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The message before mine was automatic. That wasn't a real person telling you about the logo, it was a bot. I should know, I've got a handful of them on my talk page :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs) 03:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave the tweaking to you. Like I said, I'm no professional. The software I use is called Inkscape. It seems weird at first (it's easier on a PC than a Mac) but you get used to it. Just download Inkscape, download the SVG, and open it up (file menu.) Well, it's midnight. Time for bed. Won't respond 'till tomorrow."User:Nicky Nouse" is not a valid HTML tag. See Help:HTML in wikitext.
06:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PFE logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PFE logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hi. "Vandal" here

Hello, Dogman15

I saw the discussion and I'll accept that it was not an act of vandalism (although I didn't find the discussion satisfactory). Sorry. Such mistakes happen, since vandals do a lot of such things.

As for this being the first time you are accused of being a wiki-vandal: No it isn't. You are already charged of being a vandal at least twice before this. If you don't remember them... well... Fleet Command (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was back when I was very new to Wikipedia. It was a non-malicious edit related to Kangaskhan. I am by no means a vandal, nor have I ever purposefully vandalized any article on any wiki page anywhere. dogman15 (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, look; some of us should read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources more often. You see, in Wikipedia when something in an article is likely to be challenged, the contributor must add an inline footnote reference to it. You can't just put the source in talk page, where no ones looks at it, and then expect people not to challenge your seemingly odd assertion.

So, if you have reliable sources for that Red Dragon thing, add a <ref></ref> to the first instance of "Red Dragon" and cite your source in it. Use {{Cite video}} to your advantage.

If you are asking yourself why the I don't do it myself, that's because I don't own a DVD version of How to Train Your Dragon with commentary. Not all the people watch the movies on DVD, you know. After all, you know what theaters are made for, don't you?

Fleet Command (talk) 02:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Animorphs things

Hork-Bajir

I noticed you adding a pronunciation into Hork-Bajir earlier today, and saying you weren't sure if it was correct. Can you show where you got the information from? If it's from the author or the publisher directly, it is for all practical purposes the correct pronunciation. If not, we might be better off with no pronunciation at all. —Soap— 11:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It took some searching, but I eventually found an archived author Q&A with K. A. Applegate from the Scholastic web site. In addition, the characters on the TV series pronounced it "Hork-buh-JEER", and many fans on message boards and YouTube videos agree with this. I am firm in believing it is not "Bah-Yeir" or whatever. -dogman15 (talk) 07:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animorphs (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animorphs (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animorphs: Shattered Reality

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animorphs: Shattered Reality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 04:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animorphs: Know the Secret

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animorphs: Know the Secret requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 04:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Animorphs

As you know, I tagged them for csd, but if you can better explain the content of the games I'll gladly remove it. JDDJS (talk) 04:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'm spending the rest of my evening doing. dogman15 (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2012 in literature

The article 2012 in literature has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 05:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Go ahead and delete it if you want, but it will be recreated eventually, and that information I added will be on it, because you can bet your fancy official Wikiness ways that those books will be released in those two months. Just because my source was the Hirac Delest blog doesn't mean it's not true. Have a fun day being official and rule abiding, you deletionist :P dogman15 (talk) 05:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pixar references

Message for you at the talk page. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 14:48 9 December 2010 (UTC)

IMBD on Pokemon

I would stop if I were you. They will likely be reverted. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 21:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They're still relevant. Those links show all the places where that character was voiced. The information is free and not copyrighted, and removing it only makes Wikipedia less useful. dogman15 (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there has been discussion before about IMDB on Pokemon species articles, and it was discouraged. Also, unless you are going to put it on all 46, they will not be uniform, and someone will wonder why it isn't on the other pages. Bring it up at WT:POKE before you put them on all the pages for nothing._Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 21:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See, this is different. I read those archived discussions, and they were about how IMDb was not a reliable source for citing articles, specifically an old revision of the Mewtwo article. Here, I'm not using IMDb as a source for citing, rather, I'm linking to it so that readers of an article about a Pokémon will have more related pages on the web to visit to get information they want. If I have to repeat my stance I've stated here somewhere else to be heard and listened to, I will. dogman15 (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I would bring it up at WikiProject Pokemon. It is a somewhat controversial change that some people might challenge. You need to be ready to say that it has been discussed, and it is allowed. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 21:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm totally ready for that. Bring it on! I love fun, pointless word battles. :P Meanwhile, I continue to have fun with my little {{imdb character}} trapeze. dogman15 (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are being silly. Just talk it out, and get consensus for it. No need to be fishing for an edit war. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 21:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Fictional Characters

Hi, I was wondering if you wanted to comment on the possible creation of a "WikiProject Fictional Characters" here. It is currently lacking comments, and more importantly, possible members. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 22:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've set up the project. First discussion's on setting up a basic/default design for an article, see here. Harry Blue5 (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Math Blaster images

I've removed the following images from the Math Blaster Episode I: In Search of Spot and marked them as orphaned fair use to try to fit the article into the fair use policy: File:Galactic Commander.png, File:Math solver.png, File:Math Blaster intro 1.png, File:Trash Zapper.png, File:Cave Runner.png, File:Math Blaster.PNG. Hugahoody (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well Done!

Excellent work correcting the animorphs article! Keep up the good effort! A Very Manly Man (talk) 07:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! But I've been working on a whole slew of Animorphs-related articles, not just the one Animorphs article. I've revamped character infoboxes, morph tables, character descriptions (and previously unlisted characters), and refinement of plot summaries. Which page did you first notice my work on, prompting you to note me here? dogman15 (talk) 07:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Recentchanges Your work is appreciated nonetheless, have a cinnamon bun, or a tray of them, or a whole cart of them.AerobicFox (talk) 08:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For power users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re:Thank you!

I'm glad you liked it. ^^ About the movie, I didn't know about it until now (movies get very little exposure where I live), but looking at the reviews, it does seem like a good movie. I'll try to watch it someday. - Master Bigode (Talk) (Contribs) 19:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brave logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brave logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Day & Night title card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Day & Night title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Equestria Daily

A discussion you previously took part in regarding the Equestria Daily page has been relisted for deletion. Dr. WTF (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. I'm always clicking the "My Contributions" at the top of the page to check on it that way. dogman15 (talk) 01:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned Rio pictures

Orphaned non-free image File:Rio soundtrack album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rio soundtrack album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rio score album.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rio score album.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rio soundtrack album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rio soundtrack album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rio score album.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rio score album.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roald Dahl task force!

Hello, Dogman15/Archive 1, We are wondering if you would like to join the Roald Dahl task force as you have contributed a lot to the articles in our scope. We hope you can join!

Help on the rest of the MLP characters

Usually I kinda went off the wall and created several pages for the rest of the My Little Pony. Now, I need help proofing them. So can you volunteer?--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the edits you made, but I don't think there's anything I want to add to their articles at this point. Eventually, we should include more information on their origins/development, and maybe some information from mlp.wikia.com. dogman15 (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Koopalings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Rankin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you're just a bot, but for any humans reading this, James Rankin (actor) is the intended target, but that article does not exist. By linking to the disambiguation page, people will see that there are other James Rankins and that one of the Rankins in the list is an actor. Make sense? dogman15 (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

<br />

This may be slightly highlevel and not exactly perfect explaination, but the BR without a / is an older form from the HTML standard. The version with a / is known as a "self closing" tag, and is the current XHTML 1.0 form. Wiki can handle the older form, but it's actually (in some places) translating it to the / form behind the scenes, as wiki serves documents with the XHTML 1.0 Transitional specifications. No direct harm using the old form, but the correct form is good practice. ferret (talk) 04:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! dogman15 (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Martha Speaks (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hey Arnold! The Movie game.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hey Arnold! The Movie game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ekans and Arbok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re:Not crediting the composers?

{{Infobox video game#Credit_fields}}. I haven't read any article that proves they've played a significant role for this game. « ₣M₣ » 10:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't like it. >:( dogman15 (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mysterious FIM voices (and "The Last Roundup")

I believe you can solve the long unsolved mystery of who did who by asking crew members directly. I'm sure our dedicated reporter can handle this job very well. (Sorted by top importance)

Mr. Carrot Cake
We know Ms. Libman and Ms. Germain did Pound and Pumpkin Cake, but actually don't know exactly who played who.
Spot of the Diamond Dogs
The voice of the "Muffin" line as happened in this clip
Every appearance of the fan-named "Bon Bon" (Her voice is different by episode, you know.)

And, do you know how to get the official public answer from Hasbro about the edition of "The Last Roundup" concerning "Derpy Hooves"? (as well as the new voice of "Derpy".) JSH-alive ^{talk • cont • mail} 18:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry... do I know you? I don't think I've ever conversed with you before. Yes, I watch MLPFiM, but I don't know why you're coming to me with this. dogman15 (talk) 01:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, then. I mean, I was amazed at your skill. You met the crew members on the internet to get the facts. With this, I believe you can confirm who really did Mr. Carrot Cake's voice, at least. (I'm not even sure whether it really is Brian Drummond or not.)

I've only talked with a few, and they don't always respond to my questions about voice actors (the ones who would know, at least). What I (and others) do is make my best guess as to who a voice could be using reasonable "small windows" of possibilities, and make an educated guess, but I always try to confirm when I can. For a while we thought Tabitha St. Germain did Zecora's voice, and that's how it was on IMDb and mlp.wikia.com/wiki/Zecora. But then Andrea Libman said it was Brenda C. on her Twitter, and so we went through and changed that all with citations. It's not huge deal. dogman15 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I didn't catch that addition when I added the viewership #s on Canterlot Wedding, but it was perhaps because I was looking for the actual numbers. Sorry about that. --MASEM (t) 02:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - you wrote it better than I could. Thank you for that! /) dogman15 (talk) 02:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featured songs (MLP:FiM

I noticed you removed my additions on the canterlot wedding songs on the MLP episode list, and left this comment: "(Listing featured songs here would be nice, but they were all already removed a few weeks ago. Plus, the reprise of BBBFF is in ep. 25, not 26. Either list them all or list none.)."

I'd like to get some clarification on that comment. Would you like me to add all the songs (and fix the placing on BBBFF) or just leave them alone?

Thanks! --Dr. Doctor 18:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrDoctor13 (talk • contribs)

Go ahead and add back in all the songs, and then I'll make any necessary revisions to make them accurate. I've talked with Daniel Ingram and Steffan Andrews a bit, so I know a thing or two about the song credits. dogman15 (talk) 20:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll work on that ASAP. --Dr. Doctor 15:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrDoctor13 (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free media (File:EquestriaDailyScreenshot.png)

Thanks for uploading File:EquestriaDailyScreenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New uploads

Hi Dogman15, I have a little request if you have time to do. It is about soundtrack and score covers that you have uploaded on Rio film article. Now, could you upload better versions of those covers. Soundtrack cover should be much better than existing one, not necessarily larger, but better, and score cover shouldn't have that gray border around it. You noted that you used Paint for editing, I recommend you to use ACDSee, which is much much better than Paint.

I found these online for you to upload if you don't want to waste time on editing: [2] and [3]. Also you should put this template on top of every page:

I would do all that by myself, but I no longer work with soundtrack/score covers. Thank you in advance. InfamousPrince 17:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You "no longer work with soundtrack/score covers"? What kind of nonsense is that? You can work on anything on Wikipedia! And Paint is a perfectly fine program to use for simple image editing! Sure, it has its limitations, but it gets done what I want it to do. I'll make your little edits, nonetheless. dogman15 (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, easy bad boy, I asked you to do my "little" edits, as far as I know, I didn't forced you to do anything. And yes, "anything" can be edited on Wikipedia, but I had a lot of problems with soundtrack/score covers, to prevent other editors/administrators to remove them from article or delete them, so I decide to quit working with them (because they are not worth all the trouble), and work only with film posters, DVD covers etc. I'm sorry for "all" the trouble a caused you, it won't happed again. InfamousPrince 09:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't any trouble, and I'm sorry if I offended you, but I just thought it was a little bit weird of a request. That's all. /) dogman15 (talk) 15:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pac-Man: The Adventure Begins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashleigh Ball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

Re [4] while images at Commons are supposed to be copryight free, many times people incorrectly upload images that are obviously not free claiming that they are the author. This particular image was stolen from a facebook page without any of the proper attribution or licensing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series) episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dumbwaiter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The Alien.png

Thanks for uploading File:The Alien.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]