User talk:DieOfGoodLuck

T-34

You added an {{unreferenced}} to T-34 with the comment: "The introduction cites no sources at all -- placement of a source tag pending their addition." Per Wikipedia's manual of style (WP:LEAD), not only do introductions not need references, they shouldn't normally have any as everything contained in them should be referenced somewhere else in the article. Hope this makes sense, Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thank you. I grow a bit suspicious of any sentence which contains the words "widely regarded" while it does not cite its sources, hence my edits of late. DieOfGoodLuck 13:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. "Widely regarded" usually is a bad sign! Probably true in this case, but I hope there's a cite somewhere in the article for that. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Helping

This is your first offical commendation so- Thank you very much for your work of Command and Comquer related articles.--[[User:Yossi842| Yossi842]] 18:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:Command and Conquer

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Defense Initiative storyline (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brotherhood of Nod storyline. — Deckill er 06:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Euronews

Another user reverted the same edit because the IP put up a source link that does not work. Momusufan (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the source link in question. Momusufan (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talk page of the EuroNews article. DieOfGoodLuck (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]