User talk:Destination void

adminhelp

please help me someone i am facing some trouble with user: tavix on my contribution on an article concerning a band i know and like: Destination Void (band).

he seems to start some kind of witchhunt with my article about this band. okay it is a death metal band. many christians have problems with death metal bands.

BUT: wiki-admins should always stay neutral and should not start discriminating witchhunts because of their PERSONAL beliefs and/or convictions.

this mr. tavix is as far as i know some kind of professor dealing with chistianity and church related topics whatsoever. i don´t really care what he is doing with his time..... he should just leave me alone and let me bring some data and infos about bands to people who like the bands and/or want to know more about things behind the scenes.

Is that such a big problem?

I am from Austria. We have here the freedom of speech. If that is not what wiki stands for I will delete everything myself and tell all others to do it as well.

If people like tavix [or whatever his name is] are representing wikis policies - then it will stagnate once in a while

Nominating a seemingly non-notable band likely written from a conflict of interests for deletion is not a witchhunt. However, if during the deletion debate, you are able to prove that this band meets our criteria for inclusion as outlined at WP:BAND, the article will likely be kept. –xeno (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dear xeno:

i think the band destination void meets the demands outlined at WP:BAND- at least at point six where ist says:

6) Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such, and that common sense exceptions always apply.

Gregor Schmidt ["Capral Adorator"] has done 2 CDs with the original band "Miasma" which both are still available worldwide and distributed by Napalm Records [after buying the rights from Lethal Records]. Even all other members of the band Destination Void have been part of Miasma before and have performed numerous shows with Miasma. I hope by now that all problems are solved, as I put "Redirects" to the original band-page. Thus I suppose Wiki should be able to delete the "this page may be deleted"-notification. If not please let me know what else i have to do.....

You'll have to present that argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destination Void (band). –xeno (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Disastrous Murmur

A tag has been placed on Disastrous Murmur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr. Vernon (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sextiger

A tag has been placed on Sextiger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr. Vernon (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Eternal Curse

A tag has been placed on Eternal Curse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr. Vernon (talk) 12:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Destination Void (band)

A tag has been placed on Destination Void (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Destination Void (band) is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Destination Void (band) saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Ged UK (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Destination void, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiabilty

The main problem with the articles you have tried to start is our verifiabilty policy. What it means is that we must have a way to check the information in our articles. If you have any newspaper articles or books or other reliable sources where we can control the information, we would love to have the articles.

I'd also like to ask you to change your userpage. Right now it's about a band but userpages are supposed to be about you and your relationship to wikipedia. Please change it to "Hi, I'm Destination void from Austria. I like Death Metal and plan to work on those kinds of articles" or something like that. You can read more about userpages here.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talkpage. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 17:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Destination void! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Martin Schirenc - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]