User talk:Denghu

Welcome!

Hello, Denghu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Khoikhoi 15:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Avos

Your recent edit to Avos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 08:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russian Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! abakharev 08:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avos

Thanks for the article, it is quite usable and have interesting citations added. On the other hand in my honest opinion it looks rather like a collection of citations rather than a coherent text. I would start that Avos is a Russian word meaning ..., in 19th century it was speculated (by whom) that it reflects some national mentality in twentieth century... Some examples. Your citations. External links/References.

I have advertised the article on Portal:Russia/New article announcements, so maybe somebody will give you a hand with it, if no I will do it myself abakharev 08:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Привет

Hello, I want to thank you for your warm words. Actually, my command of English is very limited. I have never been abroad, learning English when browsing the web. If you want details, you may want to send me an e-mail. By the way, if you want to leave your signature after a post, it's enough to type four tildas, like this: ~~~~ Happy edits, Ghirla ^-трёп- 12:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Serbian Embassy Moscow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Serbian Embassy Moscow.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel, in regards to the photo of the Serbian Embassy in Moscow you need to provide a valid licence. Refer to Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for information on the tags you can use. IF you need help with this, let me know on my talk page. I don't suppose you managed to get photos of the other embassies on Mosfilmovskaya? They would come in very handy for Diplomatic missions in Russia. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 13:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Russavia, thanks for your recent message about the Serbian Embassy image. I know things have gone wrong with it, I just didn't remember to specify the licence when I was uploading it, and I re-uploaded it to choose the right licence but apparently it didn't work. What do I do? The image qualifies as own work, so there should be no problems with the copyright. Do I have to delete it and re-upload? Let me know what's best to do. I will upload more images of all the embassies at Mosfilmovskaya Street provided I get close enough to take pictures. Denghu (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What licence do you want to use? If GFDL, simply insert {{GFDL}} in the licence section. If you need more help, just buzz me. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 14:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done it. I chose the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence.

Cool, all ok now. In regards to the other embassies, there is a really good map at this link and a list of addresses at Mosfilmovskaya Street (also note the Chinese and Uruguay embassies within short distance of Mosfilmovskaya (to the south). Any of those, or any of the other embassies on Diplomatic missions in Russia which are missing, would be great. Do you work in the Mosfilmovskaya area? --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 17:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeap. :-) Thanks for the link. Although I know the area well enough, I'm not sure about the whereabouts of some embassies. I'll get all this done within a week's time.Denghu (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be sweet. Here is a more precise map of the area, with each of the embassies noted by the flag symbol. As is usual for Moscow streets, the majority of the embassies are located in alleys off Mosfilmovskaya, but address is still Mosfilmovskaya. Too bad the majority are Brezhnev-era buildings; not real pretty to look at are they --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 17:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the map, Russavia! :-) Yeah, some of those buildings look somewhat ugly. Some are quite interesting, e.g. the Swedish embassy.

No problem, I noticed the new photos, great stuff. What I have done is transferred these to Commons, so that they can be used across all WP projects, not just here on English WP. The speedy deletion tags below are simply notification that the local WP copy can be deleted due the photo now being on Commons - this won't affect the usability of the photos here on WP, no changes need to be made. If you want to delete the notices below go ahead and do it, they are just notifications advising you of the move. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 11:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russavia, thank you for the explanation. More pics are coming soon. I've taken pictures of all the embassies found in the Mosfilmovskaya area. But some have to be edited so that I can improve their quality (some of them look too dark).

No worries. I have transferred the rest of your photos to Commons. You might want to check them out on common (use the Unified login), put them on your watchlist, and change preferences on Commons to receive an email when your watched pages are changed, so that you will be notified if anything changes and respond where appropriate. Look forward to seeing the other photos. P.S. You are German yeah? Lybia instead of Libya is a bit of a giveaway ;) --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 23:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naja :-) Vielleicht war ich Deutscher in meinem vorigen Leben :-)) Ich bin ein multi-kulti Mensch! I tried and edited those two pics I uploaded tonight using Photoshop to make them look brighter, but I don't like the quality still... The thing is there was no sunshine when I was taking the pics. Anyway, more pics are coming soon as agreed!

I have moved your new photos to Commons also, you can see them here. Good answer to my question ;) --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 21:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the embassy of Uruguay has moved to another location in central Moscow. Denghu (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that is correct, I didn't notice that on the map. Looking at the map there's only Nicaragua, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Romania and China left? Most of the buildings are fugly eh? The DPRK embassy looks more like type Korean Stalinist architecture, rather than Brezhnev era? I used to know a guy who worked at the Angolan embassy, as Cultural Attache I think it was, fell out of contact with him probably 2 years ago; would have been good to get you access inside or something ;) --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 19:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Russavia! I uploaded a couple of new images. Note the new image of the North Korean embassy, I took it on a sunny day so I didn't have to use Photoshop. It looks better than the first image, I think. I will also upload a new image of the Bulgarian embassy. Compare it to the other image. Perhaps it is better too.Denghu (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something must be wrong with the UAE Embassy image. Can you help me with that?Denghu (talk) 17:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, I'm bringing this back to the left hand side of the page so it's not all crushed up on the right. I have moved the UAE photo to commons, and the photo is there on the site, but it just doesn't seem to be thumbing at the moment for some reason. I'd say leave it for the time being, for a couple of hours, and see if it doesn't start working ok again soon. I noticed also the new photos and the DPRK photo, and have moved them all over to Commons as well. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 17:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images directly to Wikimedia Commons

Hi Russavia! How are you doing? Looks like I'm done with the embassy images task. I've noticed the messages about no freedom of panorama in Russia. Good to know. I uploaded a couple of new images of bridges. They might come in handy for some pages in other sections of the Wikipedia project, so my question is: how do I propose that these images be copied to Wikimedia Commons? Denghu (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, yeah, we'll see how the images go on Commons, but at least we'll have a local copy on WP to work with in the event they are deleted from Commons. It simply means that if people want to use the photos on other projects they have to upload them to the project again. How to copy to Commons? Put this code {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} (including the {{ }}) on the photo page and save it, this will bring up a notice that it is a candidate to be moved to commons. You are able to complete the move yourself, or you can just leave it and someone will get to it in good time. If you point out which photos they are once you do the tagging, I can get them moved across for you. Sorry about the delay, was a little busy with the A & SO articles. Cheers --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 02:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent tags on Kazakhstan

You've recently put up two tags about disputed neutrality on the Kazakhstan article, but you have not explained the reason on the article's talk page. You need to explain why those two sections are not neutral, and how they can be fixed. If this isn't done, the tags will soon be removed. Otebig (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Statue

Perhaps I should have sent you a heads up, I stand corrected....You know when the entire gallery got deleted the other day nobody asked my permission. Then I had to fight to get the gallery reinstated on the page.....I removed one of the two views of the same statue that you added and one view remains included. Perhaps there should be two pictures of the Michelangelo David, and two Iwo Jima statues, and another view of the Sphinx. By the way please add the artists name, the title and the date to the image. Thank you.......Modernist (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you for the quick reply. It wasn't an image of the same statue that you removed. It was a different statue. Go to the history page to see the picture. OK. I will get the information about the artist and the date a bit later. Denghu (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A closer look reveals - a mother and child, and a musician; indeed two separate statues..However they do closely resemble each other in a number of ways, and both are roughly in the same place and I think one will be sufficient. On closer view I prefer the mother and child, I left the larger image; I'll leave the choice up to you when you return with the name, dates, etc. Modernist (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join WikiProject Russia

Hi, you are cordially invited to join WikiProject Russia. We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Russia.

As you have shown an interest in Kirzhach River we thought you might like to take an interest in this WikiProject.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 22:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I accept the invitation.Denghu (talk) 14:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input requested

Hi Daniel, mate, been a while. A proposal on the re-creation of WP:RUSSIA is currently underway at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal. One of the main points is that we should have workgroups covering different topics. We are trying to ascertain the interest of editors in various workgroups under WP:RUSSIA, such as history, politics, biographical, etc; and one suggestion being a workgroup each for MSK and SPb. As you edit a lot of MSK articles, perhaps you can take a read of that proposal, comment on it wherever you have thoughts, and perhaps provide your opinion on how an MSK workgroup would operate; would there be interest, etc? Your input is valued. Cheers. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 20:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Russavia! I'd be happy to assist. I'll take a look at the proposal and comment on it. Denghu (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vernadskogo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vernadskogo, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Prospekt Vernadskogo. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Arkhangelskoe3.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Arkhangelskoe3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Arkhangelskoe3.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 21:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slavic Europe Map

You had the following comments on my map:

1. Russian is not spoken by a minority in Leningrad Region (around St Petersburg);
2. Russian is not spoken by a minority in areas between Moscow and St Petersburg;
3. According to a 1970 census 92.000 people claimed they were speakers of Karelian dialects while the overall population of the then Karelian Autonomous Socialist Republic was at 715.000 people. If you can provide updated data on that, that'll be fine. If we rely on the data I provided there is no way for Russian to be spoken by a minority in Karelia.
4. Russian is the native language of ethnic Russians in Estonia and Latvia who make up around 25 percent of Estonia's and Latvia's population respectively.

My answers are:

1, 2 and 3. For the ethnic composition of Russia I used this map: http://www.languageandpeace.com/images/other/europe.gif. Perhaps the map could be changed to reduce the non Russian speaking pockets to the actual areas where they constitute a minority to Karelians, Tatars and so on.
4. For the Russians in Latvia, Estonia and Kazakhstan I used this map: http://map.primorye.ru/raster/maps/commonwealth/russians_ethnic_94.jpg. Russian is spoken in those countries by the Russian minority and it is not used by the majority of the population (I remember that you colored all of Latvia, Estonia and Kazakhstan green, instead of just the Russian inhabited pockets).
Regarding the Republic of Moldova, I tried to color only the areas where the Russian and the Ukrainians are the majority. But I colored all of Transnistria and Gagauzia since Russian is used as a co-official language.

I'm not an expert on Slavic languages, but if the map could be improved it would be still usable.

Scooter20 (talk) 08:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scooter20, here is my opinion of the maps you gave links to:

http://www.languageandpeace.com/images/other/europe.gif - This map is VERY inaccurate and GENERAL in a very coarse way. If you look at the map of Ukraine and then read about Russian spoken in Ukraine you will see that areas around Odessa and in central Ukraine are not even indicated as bilingual. Better look at this picture: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Ukraine_cencus_2001_Russian.svg Also, trust me, nowadays only some 1000 (one thousand) people speak Finnic languages in and around St Petersburg, so it's funny to see that Russian is a 'minority language' there. ))) I'm a specialist in Balto-Finnic languages and a graduate of the Russian Institute for Linguistics, so please, believe me and edit your map accordingly.
http://www.languageandpeace.com/images/other/europe.gif - those areas marked in a mix of colors do not indicate that Russian is used by a minority there. It would be a logical phallacy to deduce that (which you did while composing your map of Slavic languages).
http://map.primorye.ru/raster/maps/commonwealth/russians_ethnic_94.jpg - this map is fine for a map showing ethnic composition of post-Soviet nations (still, the red regions indicate areas where Russians form a majority, while in fact ethnic Russians and Russian speakers of other ethnic background are more spread-out than one might think judging by this map). Yet it is quite useless for a linguistic study since it is not only ethnic Russians who speak Russian in and outside Russia. If you look at Kyrgyzstan you'll see that Russians are barely present there yet Russian is the second official language of that country.
As for Kazakhstan, I guess you know that Russian has co-official status in that country.
As for the Baltics, Russian speakers are spread out across the whole of Estonia and Latvia, yet the majority of Estonia-based ethnic Russians is in and around Narva and Kohtla-Jarve. My point was that Russian is used throughout most of Estonia and Latvia as a minority language. Read this: http://palun.blogspot.com/2007/05/demographics-and-estonia-overview.html. Denghu (talk)

My overall opinion is the following: I think it's a challenging task to collect data on the geography of Slavic languages, so you need to be well-familiar with these languages, and have something more reliable than two unverified and outdated maps. After all we all want Wikipedia to be a source of reliable and accurate information! I recommend that you read many independent sources on demographics and Slavic languages first and only then upload a corrected map to Wikipedia. Accuracy (not urgency) should be the chief goal, in my opinion.

I see!

I have created maps for Romance-speaking Europe and Germanic-speaking Europe and wanted to create one for Slavic-speaking Europe.

My initial goal was to create a map of the Distribution of Slavic peoples in Europe but then it turned into a Slavic-speaking Europe map. I know that not only Slavic peoples speak Slavic languages and there are a lot of bilingual people that speak a Slavic language, mainly in former Soviet countries.

My goal would be to create a map that shows the distribution of Slavic peoples

where they are the majority (Slavic countries)
where they are the minority (pockets of non-Slavic peoples in Slavic countries)
Slavic populations in countries with non-Slavic majority (like: Moldova, Latvia, Estonia, Kazakhstan etc)

I order to do so I would probably need more accurate sources.

Could you provide a good source map regarding the ethnic composition of Russia, which seems to be the biggest issue here.

If you can provide good maps on other countries that would be good too.

If I'll have the proper sources, I'll probably create a more accurate map when I'll have some free time.

Scooter20 (talk) 10:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll look for sources with updated and reliable data (concerning post-Soviet states). As for other Slavic languages, you'd better contact people who live in those countries. Denghu (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Ali Bannout

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Ali Bannout requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Mohammad Ali Bannout

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Mohammad Ali Bannout. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bannout Article

Hi. Thank you for your attention to the article on Mohammad Bannout I started today. Perhaps it should be said for your knowledge that Bannout is an up and coming bodybuilder, who has taken part in a number of bodybuilding contests. He is also cousin to the famous bodybuilder Samir Bannout. That article could be useful for people interested in sports. I don't see any reason why ignorance should be treated as an argument when deciding to mark a new article as qualifying for speedy deletion. Waiting for you reply. Please, remove the tag. Thank you! Denghu (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On wikipedia, the threadhold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth. A quick search revealed no reliable sources that have been included in independant, third party sources. Family relations ships are explicitely no indication of notability. Seeing that you edited the article and gave an indication that he won several contests, there must be some press coverage of these. Do you have any sources? Perhaps news articles? Or maybe websites that comply with the guidelines in WP:RS? If you can add those then i see no reason whatsoever to remove the article.

As for the tag, I will act as if i proposed deletion on the article, which means i will re-check the article in a week to see if there is any need to remove it. Good luck improving the article though! I very much prefer keeping articles over removing them :) Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say that but you are surprisingly assertive yet not informed well enough. No problems with verifiability. I don't know why you added the tag without even knowing where to check if that bodybuilder is well-known. To check that go to http://www.musclememory.com/show.php?a=Bannout,+Mohamad

And here is another link for your attention: http://www.ifbb.com/page_report.php?id=21

Do you want any more sources? Google is at your fingertips, then. Please, don't be quick to add speedy deletion tags. Especially, if you don't have enough information on the subject.

Denghu (talk) 07:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As i am working as a new page patrol i only do global checks for references on an article. In fact, those check are more of a way to determine if i should tag the article for WP:CSD, WP:PROD or WP:Maintenance, then that they are meant to source articles (Though if i found any that are undeniably good, i always add them). The difference between the tags is that CSD is tagging for immediate removal (In case there is not even a claim to notability), PROD is tagging for removal after a week (in case there is a claim for notability, but a quick search cannot establish it) and maintenance is mainly for adding non removal tags that indicate what work still needs to be done.

In this case the article (The version i tagged) had no indication of notability. It merely indicated that he was a bodybuilder from lebanon, which is about the same as "A kid from highschool" (notability wise that is! :) ). When i searched for "Mohammad Ali Bannout" i got a mere two results - can you already see the flaw? I accidentally included the middle name and did a literal search, which excluded a lot of results. Normally i would have made a variation on the name but it suddenly occured that the article you were writing might be about Mohammed Ali. In the few seconds it took me to realise that was an american boxer, and not a libanese bodybuilder, i completely forgot i had another check to do. If i would have left out Ali i would probably have given it some maintenance tags and perhaps a prod to see if it was improved.

Still, i would recommend always using this format for starting articles: Person X is a Y notable for Z. Sometimes admins are really fast with their removals and i am pretty sure that more then a few would have removed the article for wither having no context (WP:A1) or for having no notability (WP:G7). Alternatively you can use a user subpage, which has the huge advantage that those are not patrolled, which means you can work on an article in peace and quite. Last you can add the {{inuse}} or {{underconstruction}} templates to a page. Not every patrol respects those, but i virtually never go any higher then a PROD on pages tagged with those - unless i am completely sure that a page should be removed; But this is only on extreme pages such as articles that have a title that states "DFJKLSDHFJKLH" and a content of "TESTTESTTEST".

And before i quite babbling: Good job on the article! It looks a great now, a few inline refs and its about perfect. Also, my apologies for the quick tag - know that it was entirely based upon a misunderstanding. Happy editing to you :) Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 16:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excirial, thank you so much for the information. I think misunderstanding arose because I had assumed the article was to be removed on the day I created it. I'll take your advice about working on new pages on my subpage. Thank you again. Denghu (talk) 06:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Counter

I have noticed that you have added some counter to Vladimir Putin, Mosfilm and a few other articles. This usage of external links is unusable, contradicts WP:EL and may violate user's privacy (assuming they are tricked to go to the link nad their IP is logged). Please do not do this again and also remove the counter you have put on other articles. Thanks and happy editing Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Denghu (talk) 06:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Denghu. You have new messages at Russavia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of Washington Obkom

I have nominated Washington Obkom, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Obkom. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Colchicum (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Tigipko

It has been proposed that this article be renamed Serhiy Tihipko. This is a controversial move so can only be made after discussion. Since you were the person who named the article Sergei Tigipko, please could give your opinion on this new proposed change of name atTalk:Sergei Tigipko#Requested move.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seth Sandler

A tag has been placed on Seth Sandler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 18:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Slavic_languages_2009.png

Thank you for uploading File:Slavic_languages_2009.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Denghu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 190 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ofer Samra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Slavisphere3.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Slavisphere3.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Island

Please adhere to WP:BRD, you were "B'old in making a change, I Reverted the edit, and now we Discuss. Please do not revert back, as that is edit warring. I've asked for a consensus discussion on the article talk page. Please go Talk:Island#Reverted edits to discuss the edits. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your reverted edit again. I consider it totally ungrounded. I added relevant information with references. Why should it be dismissed and deleted as irrelevant without discussion? Many of the statements made in the article have no references and they are still there. What's the problem? Denghu (talk)

The problem is that you are doing what is called "synthesis". You have taken two sourced but unconnected facts and drawn a conclusion from then which neither souce supports. That is a special kind of original research called synthesis and it's not allowed. You need a citation from a reliable source to draw the conclusion, you' cannot do it, nor can I, or any other Wikipedia editor. That's the way things work here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not synthesis and you haven't provided any argument to support your claim. It is deduction. My deduction is based on dictionary definitions which state clearly that "an island is smaller than a continent". Australia is the smallest continent on Earth hence the conclusion. Denghu (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Audio

Для добавления аудиофайлов на русском у нас есть два шаблона. Основной — это {{lang-rus}}, но в нём ссылка на аудиофайл не показывается, если нет также IPA-транскрипции. Это вообще баг, который надо починить. Пока же он не починен, можно пользоваться {{audio-ru}}, что я и сделал в статье о Смоленске. Первым параметром в нём идёт название на русском; вторым параметром — название аудиофайла (без "file:"). Если файл есть на Commons, то шаблон его найдёт. Если что-то осталось непонятным, пишите.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 13, 2011; 19:56 (UTC)

Спасибо :-) Пока что вроде бы все понятно. Когда попробую загрузить и добавить в статью еще один файл, станет яснее. Denghu (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I'm scouring user pages looking for inspiring, motivating and interesting stories of how Wikipedia has affected the lives of people. I'm asking questions like "How has Wikipedia changed your life?", "What's the most interesting story you have about Wikipedia?" and "Has Wikipedia ever surprised you?"

Last year, we used the annual fundraiser as a way to show the world who it is who actually writes Wikipedia. We featured editors from Brazil, Ukraine, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, India, United States and England. This campaign was a huge success, resulting in the most financially successful fundraising campaign ever. It was also a campaign that stayed true to the spirit of Wikipedia, educating the public that this free top-5 website is created by volunteers like you and I.

This year we want to highlight more Russian-language Wikipedia editors, so I am in the process of planning a trip to Russia to interview editors.

If you or someone you know (or have heard about) has been positively affected by Wikipedia, or have something interesting to say about Wikipedia I'd very much like to hear about it!

Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know someone else with whom I should speak.

Of course, if you have any questions or concerns, please ask! I will answer as soon as I can. I apologize for any poor translation of this letter, I am using Google-translate. I hope it makes you laugh :)

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

__________________________________

Привет!

Меня зовут Виктор, и я рассказчик с Wikimedia Foundation, некоммерческая организация, которая поддерживает Википедию. Я хроник вдохновляющих историй сообщества Википедии по всему миру, в том числе и читателей, редакторов и доноров. Истории совершенно необходимы для любой некоммерческой органицации, чтобы убедить людей поддержывать наш проект, и мы знаем, что у людей, которые строют и используют Википедии есть много, что рассказать!

Я ищу вдохновляющие страницы пользователей, и интересных историй о том, как Википедия влияют на жизнь людей. Я задавал вопросы вроде "Как Википедия изменила Вашу жизнь?", "Какая самая интересная история у Вас есть о Википедии?" и "Википедия ли когда-нибудь Вас удивило?"

В прошлом году мы использовали ежегодный сбор средств как способ показать миру, кто на самом деле пишет Википедия. Мы показывали редакторов из Бразилии, Украины, Аргентины, Саудовской Аравии, Кении, Индии, США и Англии. Этот метод имел огромный успех, в результате чего у нас была наиболее финансово успешная кампании по сбору средств в историе организации. Кроме того, мы остались верны духу Википедии, просвещение общественности, что это бесплатно ТОП-5 Сайт создан добровольцами, как Ви и я.

В этом году мы хотим выделить еще редакторов Википедии на русском языке, так что я нахожусь в процессе планирования поездки в Россию и интервью с редакторами.

Если Википедия положительно повлеяла на Вас или на кого-то из Ваших знакомых, или у Вас есть что-то интересное сказать о Википедии, я бы очень хотел услышать об этом!

Пожалуйста, дайте мне знать, если Ви бы хотели участвовать в проекте Истории Википедии, или если вы знаете кого-то еще, с кем я должен поговорить.

Конечно, если у Вас есть какие-либо вопросы или сомнения, пожалуйста, обращайтесь! Я отвечу, как только смогу. Извините за плохой перевод этого письма, я использую Google-перевод. Я надеюсь, что заставляет вас смеяться :)

Спасибо за Ваше время,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 00:11, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Modular origami.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Modular origami.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vikings may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The Slavs and the Byzantines also called them ''[[Varangian]]s'' ([[Old Norse|ON]]: ''Væringjar'', meaning ''sworn men'' from var- "pledge, faith," related to Old

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qdfr (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Arkhangelskoe2.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bulgarian Embassy Moscow.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Muslim sentiment(disambiguation)

What do you mean by blanking?Xx236 (talk) 12:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I meant to move the Islamophobia article to Anti-Muslim sentiment, which is a more correct name for the article as it does not suggest anti-Muslim sentiment is always a phobia.Denghu (talk)

Cities or countries which are split between Asia and Europe

Noting that two of your edits (Europe and List of European cities by population within city limits) have recently been reverted by @Jeppiz:, to avoid any edit-warring, can I beg that you enter into discussion on the talk pages - probably at Talk:List of European cities by population within city limits. The treatment of cities or countries which are split between Asia and Europe is clearly a contentious topic, and your view is very welcome. Batternut (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made referenced edits and they were simply reverted by Yeppiz with no explanation concerning the referenced materia. I already messaged him (her). The result is that you deleted my edits supported by references. Is that logical? I don't see why I have to discuss material supported by many references. Please go to that page and look at the several last edits, you will see what I mean. Denghu (talk) 09:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't dispute your references - the question is how to treat cities and countries that are split between Europe and Asia. Have you read the discussion at Talk:List_of_European_cities_by_population_within_city_limits#Rfc:_How_to_evaluate_cities_or_countries_which_are_split_between_Asia_and_Europe.3F? Batternut (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it and I don't find it very helpful. One user provided good arguments and they were ignored by a few other users. The problem is that any user can strongly object no matter how competent or incompetent they are. And the number of people involved is very limited. Denghu (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I consider your attitude as inflammatory and irrationally vindictive. I've seen that your report has been dismissed. Quite deservedly. Denghu (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per the ANI discussion it looks like the RfC concluded that the full undivided population of Istanbul should be shown in the list. That is, the reported population should include both the European and Asian parts. If you disagree, you have the option of trying a new RfC. The last one was in mid-2015. If you continue to revert without getting a talk page consensus you would be risking a block for edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, but it is a bit belated and uninformative. I have read the RfC and have already started discussion on the talk page. I hope you are aware of that. Denghu (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow1.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moscow1.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Denghu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammad Bannout

The article Mohammad Bannout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable athlete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, Sportsfan. What are criteria for labeling an athlete as non-notable? No explanation was given. The tag is already removed, I do not know who removed it. Denghu (talk)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Denghu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Park Kultury Basrelief Young Engineers.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Park Kultury Basrelief Young Engineers.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronhjones. Thank you for letting me know. I posted a reply and provided a link to the official source of information on the discussion page. Photographs of the interior can be taken on the Moscow Underground under certain conditions. Also, pictured in the image is a bas-relief, not a sculpture.Denghu (talk) 11:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Muslim_sentiment(phobia) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-Muslim_sentiment(phobia) to the page [[:Islamophobia|Islamophobia]]. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-Muslim_sentiment(phobia) redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 6#Anti-Muslim_sentiment(phobia)|the redirect discussion]] if you have not already done so. SwineHerd (talk/contribs) 05:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Muslim sentiment(phobia) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-Muslim sentiment(phobia). Since you had some involvement with the Anti-Muslim sentiment(phobia) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism in Russia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tula and Kirov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Denghu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Denghu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]