User talk:Dberger

Welcome!

Hello, Dberger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Douglas. Apologies for the rough introduction that we sometimes give to our valued new contibutors. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Berger

Hello - thanks for the message. This AFD took place almost a year ago, so I had to reacquaint myself with the discussion and the article's text at the time of its deletion (which I can view as an administrator). The current Douglas Berger page is a redirect to Doug Berger, an article about a North Carolina state senator. Although your username is similar to the article's subject, I'm not certain, so my comments are in the third person.

As I stated in my closing statement, the version of the article about which you ask failed WP:BIO because of a lack of secondary, third-party, reliable sources. Notable people do not necessarily have articles written by them, but they have articles written about them. In addition, the notability standards for academics require verification of status and recognition by independent sources.

Not one secondary source was included in this article, but it did have lots of primary sources. It was more like a CV than an encyclopedia article, which did not help at the AFD because Wikipedia is not a directory or a web host. Several of the cited 'references' were letters to the editors of different publications; the Science article you referenced was considered in the AFD discussion and is apparently a summary of the drug development process in Japan. All are written by him, yet no third-party publications or people talk about him, or his experience, or his method, or his fame, or his expertise. I hope I'm being clear and that you understand the difference between the two types of sources, because it is the crux of the issue.

Even if the notability standards were stretched in this case for the number of published pieces he has written, it is possible for someone to be notable according to WP:PROF and yet not be an appropriate topic for an article in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources about the subject. Every topic on Wikipedia must be one for which sources exist, and this article simply didn't have any.

If an article can be written with secondary, independent, verifiable, reliable sources that discuss the man, instead of a list of articles he has written himself, feel free to create one. However, if it is similar to the deleted article, it will be deleted again.

I hope I have answered your questions, and feel free to contact me if you need further assistance. Thanks. - KrakatoaKatie 04:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Spector

We don't speedily delete articles just because they're not perfect. If you object to unsourced statements in the article, removed them or tag them as unsourced. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dberger

This page was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2008. The result of the discussion was No Consensus to delete.

— xaosflux ^Talk 03:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 13:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]