Jump to content

User talk:DaveofCali

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, DaveofCali, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!


Since I don't patrol Recent Changes and am not part of the Welcoming Committee, I don't get much of a chance to welcome new editors to the Wikipedia. This time, however, one of your recent editors showed up on my Watchlist "radar". Welcome to the Wikipedia. BlankVerse 10:36, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SoCal?

[edit]

Since you are editing Southern California topics, I'd like to mention the Southern California WikiProject, and the California WikiProject. Some of the SoCal Wikipedia editors have also recently had their first meetup and are planning the second one (see Wikipedia:Meetup/LA for more info). BlankVerse 10:36, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jessejackson.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jessejackson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 18:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Miraclemile1.jpg

[edit]

File:Miraclemile1.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Miraclemile1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Miraclemile1.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ogilviestationrelease.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ogilviestationrelease.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Memorialparkstation.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Memorialparkstation.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metrobus720.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Metrobus720.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File source problem with File:Jefffoxworthy2.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Jefffoxworthy2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 18:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parklabreaskyline.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Parklabreaskyline.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Anthonyfederovsm.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Anthonyfederovsm.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Greaterlacityarea.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Better files at c:Category:Los Angeles skylines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]