User talk:Daliel

Images

Please, please, please repost these to Wikimedia commons. if these are family photos, and you are the family member who inherited them, you own the copyright, so posting them to the commons would be easy, and would make them freely available to all projects, not just this encyclopedia. the picture of the kids might not be notable, but the others are of great historic interest. If everyone posted their personal photos of historic events/people/places, we would have a much larger collection there, much more useful. I am not old enough to have seen this store, but i love this being part of the culture of berkeley.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you posted book covers and magazine covers. If you inherited the estate of George Leite, you would have inherited the copyrights as well, unless some other entity, like a publishing firm, has them, or the artists and/or their estates own them. if you do, you could of course post them for free use, if you no longer wanted to retain copyright. as i guess you have learned, we cannot use multiple images for multiple articles under fair use, so Circle could have 1, or maybe 2 (if 2 of them are highly notable, and writen about) images there as fair use, but not for use at other articles. great collection of images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added Circle magazine to the topics at Portal:San Francisco Bay Area, which will stay there for about 3 months. I dont think many people click through, but i decided to adopt that page so its not a waste. thanks for your contributions.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2 entries

daliel's Gallery and daliel's Bookstore are obviously the same building. you will need to combine the information into one article, under the most commonly used name. If the sign outside the building was daliel's, that should probably be the name of the article. I will propose a merge of the two, so if you dont do it, someone eventually will.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More to come!

I have so much more to scan and post for both the bookstore and the gallery, that it seems a combined page might become unwieldy. External references are usually to either the store or the gallery; rarely to both. Other than "Cousin Henry", few artists of the time were both writers and painters, etc. FYI, I've begun moving images to the Commons as you suggested last year. I'll take that task as a priority. Daliel (talk) 21:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Varda The Master Builder, by Henry Miller published by Circle Editions, 1947.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Varda The Master Builder, by Henry Miller published by Circle Editions, 1947.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 06:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Men God Forgot - Albert Cossery, Circle Edition 1946.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Men God Forgot - Albert Cossery, Circle Edition 1946.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]