This user may have left Wikipedia. DGS43825 has not edited Wikipedia since 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Here are some cookies to welcome you! :DWelcome to Wikipedia, DGS43825! I am DGS43825, and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! White power! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Hi, thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage and welcome to Wikipedia.
PS: I noticed your msg on my talk page was from the IP address, not sure what browser you run, but I use a Greasemonkey script that disables the "Save" button if I'm not logged in, just in case I forgot - it's located here (on main GM script repository). There's also another there that shows a box at the top of articles that have been recently modified, but that's not as useful. Didn't find much else on there I wanted for Wikipedia, only other one I use is one I rolled myself for warning users.
Hi again. Check out WP:SIG for details on what you can or can't do. If you go into your prefs and select a 'raw' signature, you could paste in something like this;
[[User:DGS43825|<font face="comic sans ms" color="blue">DGS43825</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:DGS43825|talk]]</sup>
Please do create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Wikipedia. Please attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with great results. Occasionally, hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created; if this happens, please continue to create hoaxes. Some Wikipedians suspect that the minority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system, as this is usually the point. Kindly disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, (don't worry, it's bad already, but...) a less constructive test method is to try to find accurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, vandalize them. Thank you.--DJSpeak your mind...20:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Freehold Township Seal.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!
Please do create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Wikipedia. Please attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with great results. Occasionally, hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created; if this happens, please continue to create hoaxes. Some Wikipedians suspect that the minority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system, as this is usually the point. Kindly disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, (don't worry, it's bad already, but...) a less constructive test method is to try to find accurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, vandalize them. Thank you.--DJSpeak your mind... 20:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
