User talk:Chrisglasater

Recent edits to Rapid prompting method

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Rapid prompting method article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! – Levivich 05:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC) ==Welcome!== WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT WANT ARGUMENTS AGAINST THEIR ARTICLES> I WAS TOLD THIS WAS THE PLACE TO PUT THIS AND NOW ITS REMOVED> GOOGLE LIARS I GUESS< DONE WITH YOU Hello, Chrisglasater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.[reply]

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Wikiman2718 (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]