User talk:Choiniej

Saw your comments on South Park references, you and I are on the exact same page with it. I've opened up the issue for discussion on the main South Park wiki project page. Feel free to chime in if you wish: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_South_Park#Trivia Snafu7x7 (talk) 00:44, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research in South Park articles

The OR in South Park articles has been removed for good reason, the series doesn't merit the breaking of Wikipedia policies because of your own personal opinions. Any of that stuff appears on the pages, I'll happily remove it.Alastairward (talk) 11:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject talk page re: Original Research

You may as well forget about adding Original Research to any pages on South Park, as I've said before I'll simply remove it. Your point about needing to know cultural references to "get" the episode is irrelevant. Some people can't "get" other pieces of work, other types of programmes and books, why must there be a guide to "getting" South Park? Alastairward (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My talk page

I'm not sure what you mean by threatening, I simply made a statement of fact. Alastairward (talk) 12:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OR (again) a little help

I found this, if it's of any help to you. Alastairward (talk) 10:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alastairward

Me and a few other users are tired of him removing completely cited sections with valid sources, and we got an admin to tell him to knock it off, finally. As long as we cite sections with valid (non-wiki, non-user editable sites) he can't touch them, although it would be funny as all get out to see his account limited from editing after all of this. Anthony cargile (talk) 02:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We have expanded on this issue and reached a compromise with an admin. If you would please visit Talk:The China Probrem, click on content 17, and state how you feel about this compromise, it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you. --J miester25 (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OneSeatTheate.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OneSeatTheate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]