Thanks for uploading Image:Image14.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Mr Chandan.
Always get your facts right about any person.Remember Kannadiga is a person whose mother tongue is kannada.It is purely linguistic.There are Bunts/Billava who are both Kannadiga and Tuluva. It is nothing to do being born in karnataka.Deepika Padukone is Konkani(CSB)/Tulu(Her mother is tuluva) and she is no way kanandiga.
I have seen kannadigas always portraying Mangalorean as Kannadiga which is totally wrong.Mangaloreans are different.They are far better in Education,Culturally and looks than Kannadigas .I am sorry to find that no true kannadiga makes you proud that doesnt you put hand hand on other community people.
Always Rememeber If you are a proud Kannadiga.promote your people not others.
I hope you got my message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bipinwebcheck (talk • contribs) 04:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Chandan,
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions, however I request you to read some policies mentioned in the above welcome note. Please do not undo other editors' edits without providing valid reasons. You can either provide a meaningful edit summary (see Help:Edit Summary) or you can write in the article talk page so that other editors can involve in the discussion. Thanks and happy editing! - KNMTalk00:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chandanmm. I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to remove the for template linking to Mahendra Singh Dhoni, but this is standard practise on Wikipedia. I see you've reverted it multiple times before without saying why: if you can give me a reason involving Wikipedia policy I will refrain from adding it again, but unless you can, can you please avoid removing it again? Regards, AllynJ (talk | contribs) 06:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Money hai to honey hai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are required to provide accurate source and licensing information on the images you upload. Do not claim that you are the author if you are not. Please do not upload or use any more images until you have read and understood WP:IUP and WP:COPYRIGHTS. The images you have uploaded are now tagged for deletion due to violations of these policies. --Yamla (talk) 16:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hello admins, i'm sorry i am unable to provide the source. because it is a mailed image,so i can't search the real author. now i decided to remove the image.can you please delete that image.
Reply: Thank you for bringing this to my notice. I have searched and updated the latest working link. However, if you notice such link-not-working problem, please remove that link instead of removing the reference section itself. Reference section is meant for holding multiple references. Thank you for your contributions. - KNMTalk17:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]