User talk:Cantai101

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Canto2009 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — TAnthony^Talk 21:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been doing any sockpuppet.

When I do edits, I always make sure that I have the sources to back it up. If it becomes controversial, then I either go to the discussion board or most likely I leave the articles alone. This account is no connection whatsoever to Canto2009 or Socant. And unlike Canto2009's edits which I have seen, I make sure I have the sources and make sure they have relevance and if there are controversies, I generally leave it alone. If I find out those accounts have been used on my computer, then I will see to it that those users edit properly or no longer use their accounts to do edits on my computer.

Since there have been some problems, I won't make any contributions for a while. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cantai101 (talk • contribs) 00:09, March 1, 2010

to continue about the sockpuppet situation

I also do have have other users using my computer sometimes and we do share a few common knowledge about some of the articles I have edited. If I find out that one of the users on my computer is using Canto2009, I will see to it that it is no longer used on this computer.

Unlike what I have seen from Canto2009's contributions and hopefully it is not being used on my computer, I make sure that I have relevance and sources to back up the edits and if there are other users un-doing the edits whatsoever, I might go to the discussion board or most likely I leave the articles alone and don't do anymore edits.

I also hope that none of the users using my computer is Socant, but I wouldn't worry about Socant because according to what I have seen from socant's contributions to articles, socant like me also uses relevance/sources as well and have seen that Socant went to discussion pages before regarding article edits. And I have noticed that Socant doesn't constantly keep re-changing articles after other users have made their revertions unlike the way Canto2009 have done.

and as I have said, since there have been some problems, I will not make anymore contribution edits to articles and I will be sure to inform other users my computer to not contribute edits on wikipedia articles as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cantai101 (talk • contribs) 00:41, March 1, 2010

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cantai101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already defended that I am not a sockpuppet of Canto2009. When I make edits, I make sure they are relevant and have the sources and if there are undoings of my edits, I might go to the discussion board or in most cases leave them alone. Since I knew that there have been problems, I said that I would not make anymore edits. There was no right to block my my account because I don't have sockpuppet with Canto2009 or Socant and I have said that I will not make anymore edits. I am asking that my account be unblocked because of my defense above.

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. –MuZemike 01:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.