User talk:Buffalo15ny

Welcome

Welcome To Wikipedia! Hello, Buffalo15ny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay and make constructive edits. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and have a great time being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, I will always be willing to help or you can ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Finn article

Hey there, thanks for your contributions. I've noticed that all of your edits to date have been somehow related to the Terry Finn article you created; this is of course perfectly acceptable, but that fact and the style of writing and content in some areas suggests that you may in fact be the subject of the article herself or someone personally related. This is not explicitly forbidden, but is usually discouraged to keep articles well-sourced and in a neutral point of view. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest if you plan to continue editing the article. If you are in fact Terry Finn or personally related, we generally disclose as much by placing the {{Notable Wikipedian}} template to the article's talk page.

To be clear, I am not suggesting that there is any deceptive intent on your part or invented content. I am assuming good faith with all of your edits and only want the article to be in a form most appropriate for Wikipedia, and one that will withstand content challenges. I have edited out some wording that speaks to an editor's point of view, like that Latimore was "Impressed with her poignant portrayal of Maria" etc. If any such observations are in fact drawn from reliable books, magazine articles or web sites, they can be reintroduced (either summarized or in quotes) with citations. As noted on the article's talk page, the article needs to be better referenced in general so that individual facts, sentences or sections are attributed to specific sources. The list of references at the end is something, but they fail to support any specific information. This naturally casts doubt on facts within the article, though of course in its current state the content seems fine (to me) and not likely to be challenged on the basis of being inflammatory, invented, or promotional. Please let me know here, my talk page or the article's talk page if you need any assistance at all formatting references or the article itself. Thanks again! — TAnthony ^Talk 06:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The edits you have made exclude internal links to the cast members who appeared in the plays, films and television programs in which Terry Finn appeared. I am not certain as to why they were removed, as external links i.e. imdb.com and ibdb.com confirm this information. I am the author of this biography and husband to Terry Finn. I am listed on Wikipedia as David Snyder aka David L. Snyder and I have not as yet added any information to my bio as published. I can assure you the information in Terry's bio is correct, yet you will have to give me some guidance as to the additional procedures that I need to perform to remove the headings that question the authenticity of this article.

Best regards,

David L. Snyder

Buffalo15ny (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply! Again, I was never suggesting that any of the material in the Terry Finn article isn't true, I just wanted any personal connection/potential conflict of interest to be made clear, and wanted to help the article to be as well-sourced as possible.

As far as citations go, take a look at Bernadette Peters ... you will notice that the main body of the article is peppered with references that support individual facts, sentences or paragraphs. This is important to preserve the integrity of an article, because unverifiable information can be challenged and removed.

I removed the co-stars primarily because they are largely unnecessary in an article about Terry, and seem to have been added to enhance the significance of the plays or films. Bob Hoskins remained notable because he invited Terry onto his next project. An article must always be written from a neutral point of view, and I made some other adjustments to minimize what I felt was an occasional "promotional" tone. However, it is 100% fine for you or anyone to include quotes from (and/or references to) any positive reviews of Terry's work, assuming of course they are from reliable and verifiable sources.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance, and I've got the article on my watchlist so I may jump in and help you with technical stuff like formatting references if you need it. Thanks! — TAnthony^Talk 07:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note my fixes to your latest additions. References are placed by the corresponding facts, the "<ref>" coding will make them appear automatically in the reference section. Also, be careful not to add your signature within an article, only after talk page comments.— TAnthony^Talk 21:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Free Thinkers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Free Thinkers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. [[CharlieEchoTango]] 07:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 22 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the CineAlta page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]