User talk:Bobsmith319

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bobsmith319 has not edited Wikipedia since 26 August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope your time here is enjoyable and productive. Your comment regarding pregnancy was rude and breaks the policy of civility on WP. The image has been discussed many times and found perfectly acceptable Maustrauser 01:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may not remove warnings from your talk page. I have reverted it. Lamont A Cranston 22:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page. You are most welcome to put explanations for your actions, but removal is not acceptable. May I also ask that you sign your posts with four tildes on your editing remarks, such as you did for Pregnancy Image 26 weeks. Maustrauser 22:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Talk:Pregnancy

Your recent edit to (diff) was reverted by in an attempt to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --205.188.117.10 20:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How dare you! I was trying to make Wikipedia better by trying to make it safe for all! This not considered vandalism this helping other users to wake up, and delete this image! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bobsmith319 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see "Wikipedia is not censored" at Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for a clarification of Wikipedia policies on this matter. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cease removing images from pregnancy. This issue has been debated and a reasonable concensus achieved on the discussion pages. Maustrauser 02:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia says deleting images is allowed, and I will if I find crude images such as that one. --User:Bobsmith319 02:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)bobsmith319[reply]

Indeed it does allow the deleting of images. However, the image in question has general concensus that it is acceptable and educational. Your deeming of naked pregnant women as 'crude' does not have general support by the editors of the pregnancy article. Maustrauser 03:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the photographer of the picture in question, I find it equally offensive that you label this picture as "crude". Goes to show there's two sides on each story. Stop removing it. Inferiz 23:59, 10 October 2006

Please let me explain. I have not removed in several weeks, and don't plan to. I find your view of my thoughts extremly offensive. bobsmith319.

I find you pushing your views on others as offensive. That picture in the pregnancy section is perfect for the article. If you continue to have problems with Wikipedia nudity in other articles, please start a discussion on it first in the Discussion and see what others have to say. If you continue to delete the image as you have done in the past, I will report you. I appreciate that you have said that you will no longer change it. Thanks for your cooperation, and although I don't agree, I respect the fact that you will try to make Wikipedia better for all. Just make sure others want it that way too-thats how the Wikipedia works :) --WhereAmI 05:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)\[reply]

I find your view of my thogughts offensive. I have started a discussion about the photo, and have found some help as well.

So you find my views of your views of offensive to you in your thoughts to be offensive? Thats fine. Just stop vandalizing the wikipedia.--WhereAmI 05:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't vandalize wikipedia. I would consider that making Wikipedia more safe for all. I don't appreciate that you are giving newcomers a hard time. bobsmtih319.

Three Revert Rule - 3RR

As a new user, you may not be aware of the three revert rule. If you breach this rule in your editing you may be banned for a period from editing WP. You may wish to read this page: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/WP:3RR Maustrauser 03:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are many people who are in favor of removing this inapropriate image. You do not have the right as a veteran wikipedia memeber to boss others around.

AfD Nomination: CNA Financial Corporation

An article that you have been involved in editing, CNA Financial Corporation, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNA Financial Corporation. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Mount Prospect, Illinois

I saw a message that you posted about uploading photographs. If you would like to upload photos of Mount Prospect, Illinois, please visit http://commons.wikimedia.org and upload them there. They should have good descriptive names like "Mount_Prospect_Public_Library_Sept_22_2006.jpg" rather than "photo3.jpg". Then the pictures can be used in the English Wikipedia and those in other languages. You might enjoy visiting the Spanish Wikipedia at http://es.wiki.x.io or the French Wikipedia at http://fr.wiki.x.io --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Won't Be Home For Christmas

Because song lyrics are copyrighted material, we cannot use them in articles without explicit permission from the copyright holder - that is why I removed them from the article. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 00:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)So, if I had permission, I could put back on?[reply]

If you could prove that you had permission from the copyright holder, then they could be used. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 01:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments about me

So you were not banned? Oh, I see. I should put you back on my watch page then. I also took the liberty of fixing my wiki page so it did not seem like you were talking about the section "Your article" I gave you your own section, and made a section in yours for people to express themselves about your comments on them.--WhereAmI 04:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then. I find it offensive that you put me on your watch page. I find your comment about me extremly offensive and extremly uncivil as well. [[--Bobsmith319 21:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)bobsmith319]][reply]

License tagging for Image:Bob-come-on-down.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob-come-on-down.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bob-come-on-down.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob-come-on-down.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for adoption

Welcome!

Hello, Bobsmith319, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Again, if you have any questions about WP, I'd be glad to help! Sr13 (T|C) ^{Editor review} 20:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, How do I accept the adoption? Thanks for your help.

There is no accepting it, you work with the adopting user via talk pages/instant messenger/irc or what ever you decide on. Please remember to sign your edits. Somitho 02:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am sorry but I believe that you are incoorect. I have seen notices on some pages saying the user has been adopted, however mine only says that this user has been offered adoption. Robert Michael Smith 21:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your note on User:Luna Santin/Improve me

Unfortunately, I haven't the slightest clue how anything I said was offensive. But, have a nice day! – Luna Santin (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:K-m-k.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:K-m-k.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:K-m-k.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:K-m-k.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. cohesion 01:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pregnancy Photo

You have been warned repeatedly to stop removing the image, you have been discussing it on the talk page and know that consensus is against you. This is not how wikipedia works. Stop removing the image or I'll have to take action against you. Kuronue 02:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are well aware that Wikipedia is not censored.I'm not being uncivil;I'm informing you that you know better than this. Ah well. You've chosen your path. Kuronue 20:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Bobsmith319)

Hello, Bobsmith319. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bobsmith319, where you may want to participate.

-- Kuronue 20:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're supposed to use the "response" section, I'll move your post for you. Kuronue 03:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, most appreciated. --bobsmith319 03:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Fonda Music Box Theater

A tag has been placed on Henry Fonda Music Box Theater, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 00:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...for the barnstar; that was very kind of you, and I appreciate it! (I moved it to the bottom of the page.) Best wishes, Antandrus (talk) 16:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to my talk page

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User_talk:Lamontacranston. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.

I have withdrawn your RfA

Hi Bobsmith319. I have withdrawn your RfA, as there was no chance of it suceeding at present. You should probably read it, so you can find ways to improve. Good luck. --Deskana (talky) 11:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just further to Deskana's comments, don't be discouraged! You do good work :) Participate in some of the Wikipedia-space discussion such as XFD, and try again in a few months. Pursey 17:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pursey, thank you for your kind words! I will participate in some Wikispace, and I plan to try again in early November. --bobsmith319 18:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're enthusiastic... but, I'd wait until at least January before trying again. A lot of people will Oppose simply based off not enough time since last RfA. Plus three months gives you time to build up more quality edits, and get stuck into XFD etc. I'd suggest asking for peer review too, this can help you out with what you can work on to get the most out of your time on Wikipedia. Pursey 19:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. By the way I was just wondering, what is Wikipedia space and XFD? Thanks, --bobsmith319 19:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Check out WP:XFD. They are the discussions for deletion of articles, etc. which you can participate in :) Pursey 19:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knock it off

Please stop with the personal noisemaking at User talk:72.83.118.69. Thank you. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 23:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, he has been very rude to me and I want to request to you that his block be extended. He is more gilty of the "noisemaking" than me!

And he's been blocked. Continue as you have been and you'll join him. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 20:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please understand that he started bothering me first, I never bully members, especially without a legitimate reason. I would suggest that you take a look at the contributions and see what he has done to me, as what he has done to me is far more more worse than my responses to his rude messages to me. --bobsmith319 22:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you're somehow making it better posting nasties on a blocked user's talk page? Doesn't help anything at all. Has nothing to do with you personally -- I routinely ask editors not to harass blocked users. If he misbehaves when and if he returns, we'll notice (and you'll tell us then, I'm sure.) --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 22:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will stop, but if possible, will you add a similar message to the one you sent me so he will stop also? Thanks! --bobsmith319 22:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's blocked. There's nothing he can do. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 22:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dee-dee! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.118.69 (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You serious?

[1] Really? :) Jmlk 1 7 05:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, thanks for the concern :) Jmlk 1 7 01:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Illinois 2007 Census

The WikiProject Illinois 2007 membership census has concluded. If you did not add your name during the last week, you were declared "inactive" in the project, your name is still listed at The Participants Page. You can change your status by replacing {{member inactive}} with {{active}} in the table. Any members should also feel free to fill in any missing details on the list below.

IvoShandor 10:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, the link is above under "the Participation Page". IvoShandor 19:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support.

Hi Bob,

Thank you very much for coming out in support of my RfA. I appreciate your support for my nomination – which ended successfully a few hours ago. I hope to retain your confidence as I serve the community.

Please feel free to contact me if you need help with an action requiring administrative access; I will do my best to be of assistance to you. Cheers, --Aarktica 01:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Illinois Post Census Report

The WikiProject Illinois Newsletter (Beta)
"Post Census Report"
Vol. I, No. 1, Issue 1, October 2007
If you would like to delete this message, the original is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois/Newsletter/Post Census Report

Census results

On October 4, 2007 WikiProject Illinois embarked on a membership census. The census was the project's first since its establishment on September 24, 2005. Due to the nature of the wiki, and the two years that had passed, it seemed likely that many of the project's older members were no longer active. The project page had grown stagnant and the census provided an opportunity to see who was still around, slaving away in their own corner of the encylopedia, unknown to the rest of the Illinois editing world. Well, now, the tabulation is complete, and after a notice at the Community Portal, we have gained a couple new members amongst the cluster of project veterans who returned to sign up.

Of the 55 members listed on the project membership list on October 4, 26 editors returned to the list to "resign up," thus, confirming their current activity within project areas. If you received this message, you were one of those editors. The List of Participants has now been updated to reflect the results of this membership survey, with members who failed to respond highlighted as "inactive." Now, as a group of editors, we have a core list of individuals, that will hopefully grow in size as the project strives to become a better organized central collaboration space for editors working on Illinois related topics.

What's next?

The big question, where does the project go from here? Well there are a few proposals being floated at this project page. Little discussion has occurred thus far, and participation would be key to all of them. Some ideas include:

An A-class review system, under the WP:ILLINOIS banner, to serve the Illinois and Chicago WikiProjects.
A project newsletter, of which this is a beta version.
Project restructuring, to include regional and specific discipline task forces.
A monthly project collaboration to grow out of our currently idle collaboration division.

From the Editors

Welcome new members: Laleena, Omnedon and Rickvaughn
Interested in helping building and developing a project newsletter? See, start and join in on the proposal discussion.
The table is back up at the List of Participants and it has several blanks you can fill in if you have not done so already. They are: where you are originally from, where you live, the project areas you work in, your join date, and now, your status (which has been filled in for you).

News & Notes

Don't forget to add the project page to your watchlist so you can monitor the project talk page for relevant discussion.
As a note: WP:ILLINOIS is the project page shortcut and WT:ILLINOIS is the project talk page shortcut.
Kranar drogin essentially single-handedly cleared out the massive backlog in Category:Unassessed WikiProject Illinois articles, feel free to sprinkle his page with barnstars and thank yous, he deserves it. Everyone can help keep it cleared out by checking it for unassessed articles. For more information see the Assessment division of the project, though it isn't as project specific as it should be, it has enough info to give assessors an idea of what to do. Be aware that classes A, GA and FA can only be imposed by outside review processes.
The AlexNewArtBot dumps new Illinois related articles on this page periodically. You can help monitor new material by watchlisting the page, and combing new Illinois articles for clean up, referencing and other needed editing work.

Contributors to this Issue

IvoShandor

IvoShandor 06:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Office Season Four Episodes

Hi, please stop changing the production codes of the episodes of season four of The Office. They are all correct as they originally were. Thanks, Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 02:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, that may be true for other shows, but not for The Office. All season 4 codes begin with a 40. Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 22:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brady Bunch Edit

Watch what you revert, you put some screwy crap in there that I had to take out.--71.168.56.109 (talk) 01:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!

The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Lattof YMCA

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lattof YMCA, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lattof YMCA is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lattof YMCA, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!

The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Bobsmith319! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Changes in your adoption status

Hi there, I'm messaging you to let you know that I've removed Template:adopting from your user page because you have been inactive for at least 30 days. If you are active again, you are welcome to add the template to your userpage anytime. -- Gabrielchihonglee-Bot (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bobsmith319 2

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bobsmith319 2, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Stale unfiled RfAs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bobsmith319 2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]