Jump to content

User talk:Bibliomaniac15/Archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hiya

[edit]

Hello Bibliomaniac, for your good work as an admin and crat I make you member number 3!

Bibliomaniac15 has been made a member of the Order of the Mop,
for their work as an admin and is entitled to display
this award for being such a great admin,

Kind regards and happy editing,
Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 06:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grats. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 06:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

[edit]

I wanted to thank you so much

[edit]

For the Awesome Wikipedian Star you awarded to me more than a year ago in March 2009. I don't think I thanked you at the time mainly because I was just so flabbergasted to get an award like that, especially from someone that I think I had not ever "talked" to. So anyway, many many thanks for your kindness. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 00:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Hey, just writing to thank you for giving me my own Awesome Wikipedian day. Funnily enough, I see you gave June 6 to NocturneNoir, who am I currently working with to bring up List of Spice and Wolf episodes to FL.--十八 05:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, odd. Don't recall ever receiving that. Do quite like the recognition though. Thanks biblio, feels quite empowering to be listed among greats! ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ♯♭ 15:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I might have given that to you back when you were on wikibreak. :P bibliomaniac15 16:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't have it shown up in my talkpage archives or history though? Curious, really. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ♯♭ 17:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think what happened was that I had you on my list, but I saw that you weren't active and so I didn't get it to you. :P That was a year ago, though, before I stopped the Today thing. I only very recently revived it again. bibliomaniac15 17:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, a year ago, when I conveniently didn't have a talkpage. That would explain it, wouldn't it... Haha, my bad. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ♯♭ 17:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation on admin noticeboard re: block of ISP for low-income users

[edit]

I have started a conversation regarding a block of an ISP for low income users that was initiated two and a half years ago and was recently lifted. You were one of the people that helped review the initial block or helped review it when it was lifted. I am cordially inviting you to join in the conversation.
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Two and a half year block of ISP for low-income users
Thank you very much for you thoughtful consideration. - Hydroxonium (talk | contribs) 03:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Awesome Wikipedian Day

[edit]

Thank you! What a coincidence, I was just looking at a list of AWD recipients yesterday but didn't think that I would recieve one less than 24 hours later! :D ~AH1(TCU) 18:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll reuse this section. A little appreciation is always, well, appreciated. (Don't show that writing to FLC, please). Thanks. Courcelles 23:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]


 The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For your sudden revival of the Awesome Wikipedian's Day program, I hereby award you the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar. Keep up the great work! ~AH1(TCU) 18:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naultinus overhaul; reassessment query

[edit]

Hey man. I'm a member of the Amphibians and Reptiles wikiproject and I've been doing a lot of work in recent months on the article for NZ's endemic genus of Green Geckos, Naultinus. I just doubled its size in the last 2 days and I'm a stickler for verifiability ,so there are plenty of inline citations in there.. I'm pushing for GA and although I haven't finished working on it yet (I realize it desperately needs more images, I'm working on changing this atm..) I was wanting to get its quality reassessed as it's certainly above "Start" class by now - I don't feel qualified to make the reassessment however and you are an admin within the AAR wikiproject,m so I was just wondering if you would be interesting in making the call as to what level it is at now(?). Any feedback as to how to further improve the article would be greatly appreciated also. Cheers, Kotare (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had the hyphens in to differentiate the causes of decline from the other points - the difference in size in font is minimal between the various headers so I used the hyphens in addition -they were to show that those 3 were a set of factors within the topic of "threats and declines". I was hoping you could reassess it for me, I do feel very strongly that it is above "start" class now, especially when I compare it some of the other start class articles in the wikiproject. Was hoping to get some feedback if that is ok (?)Kotare (talk) 10:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See these for ex; Lizard, Caecilian, Salamander - all "Top" for importance in the wikiproject and all at "C Class". Naultinus now has much more content than these but most importantly more references and many more inline citations, so I would have thought it would at least be at C class. I have an aussie friend on here who is an admin and I was going to ask him to do the reassessment for me but I just thought it would be better to ask you since you are an admin within this wikiproject.. Kotare (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your constructive and helpful feedback! I have been wondering about how to better do my inline citations for a long time now.. so I will check the MOS out now - and yeah, totally, this article is extremely image poor atm. My goal is to get it to GA and I think I'll want at least 4 or 5 to get it looking better, I will send out some emails to see if I can't hunt out a few images soon. Cheers,Kotare (talk) 01:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

[edit]

Would you be able to assist with your shared resources?

[edit]

Hello. I'm pmedema and recently been asked to help out with an article Norbert Basil MacLean III. The reason I've contacted you is because your name came up in a shared resourse list. As I'm going through the references for this article a number of them are uncheckable by myself and I'm hoping you can help out with a couple of them.

Ultimately, the article is almost as detailed as President Obama's article. A brief glimps of the article, your opinion and to check a couple of references would be amazing. If you don't have the time, would you know another wikipedian who might be able to help with the references/citations?

Thanks.

Pmedema (talk)

Thanks for your assistance... Here is a couple of the ones that I'm finding difficult to check...

Obituary of Noelene A. (O'Connor) Grube, The Post Standard, April 16, 1980
Executive Order 13430, April 18, 2007
Walbert, Claude, "Bill Would Let Court-Martialed Appeal to Justices", Los Angeles Daily Journal, March 21, 2005, front page
MacLean v. United States of America, case number 02cv2250-K(AJB), U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California at docket number 9
A copy of the letter of commendation is contained in the court record of MacLean v. United States, case number 04-448C, U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Walbert, Claude, "Ex Navy Officer Hopes for Military Justice", Los Angeles Daily Journal, June 19, 2003, page 2
Vielmetti, Bruce, "Cryptologist sues banks over court-martial", St. Petersburg Times, February 19, 1994, 3B
Frush, Charlie, "A Caring Haven Where Boys Learn a Direction in Life", Philadelphia Inquirer, July 5, 1989, C2

These are some of them... Pmedema (talk)

  • Thanks for the one that you were able to email to me... The article's claim and the reference associated to it did not jive. Considering that the first hard to get reference is like this, makes me question all of Norbert Basil MacLean III and the other hard to find references. What is your opinion on how to proceed with the article if I may ask? Pmedema (talk) 04:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

[edit]

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment

[edit]

As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

[edit]

Happy Birthday

[edit]

Armbrust Talk Contribs 02:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallå

[edit]

Hej Bibliomanic15. Kan du hjälpa mig? Finns det en svenska Wikipedia? Kan du ge mig en länk till den om det finns en? Jag kan inte hitta den. Tack. 76.64.213.94 (talk) 01:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Swedish-language Wikipedia is located at http://sv.wiki.x.io. decltype (talk) 06:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

[edit]


Eustrombus gigas peer review

[edit]

Hello there Bibliomaniac15! I'd like to invite you to participate in the ongoing E. gigas peer review. I'm trying to prepare this article for a future FA candidacy. Thanks in advance from wikiproject Gastropods! Best wishes, Daniel Cavallari (talk) 11:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

[edit]

Reply to Bibliomaniac15 posting to 56PackardExec

[edit]

Bibliomaniac

I'm a new user who is not yet sure how to communicate here on Wikipedia, so I hope you will get this.

Reference the following:

Northampton At what time did these activities stop running? It seems like a bit of town history that can be integrated into a larger section about the town's history as a whole. bibliomaniac </wikipedia/en/wiki/User:Bibliomaniac15></wikipedia/en/wiki/User_talk:Bibliomaniac15></wikipedia/en/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15> 20:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

External links Official Website <http://www.northamptonboro.com/>. Northampton County Official Web Site <http://www.northamptoncounty.org/northampton/site/default.asp>. Northampton Area School District Official Web Site <http://www.northampton.k12.pa.us/>. Public Library <http://www.northamptonapl.org/Northampton>. JB's Northampton <http://sites.google.com/site/jbsnorthamptonpa/home>.

In answer to your comment of 24 June 2010, I do not have detailed info on how long these historical events existed. I have solicited further info in my postings to the main article on Northampton, PA.

However, I must note here the following with respect to the second abovenoted EXTERNAL LINKS paste herewith. The last link included is a website operated by JB (JB's Northampton), who has a quite detailed and comprehensive history, on his website, that includes significant historical details of not only Northampton's history and of it's importance in the early history of both the area of Eastern Pennsylvania but also of America itself.

Such details include not only the facts of this area of Eastern Pennsylvania being major industrial contributors to such as the construction of the Panama Canal (with cement from Northampton) and construction of the Golden Gate Bridge (with steel from Bethlehem, PA, in the Northampton area), but also history of the industries of the Northampton area: numerous major cement companies and quarries; major steel producing companies; numerous early American railroads, that serviced these industries; the historical Eastern Pennsylvania Lehigh River Industrial Canal, where mule-drawn barges transported industrial and commercial goods throughout the area via many water-locks along the Lehigh River, just like the Panama Canal; and the Northampton area towns and cities that serviced all of these early American industries.

JB's website is quite detailed with regard to much of this history, even though it is grammatically poor in presentation and, as of last updating, said to be Under Construction, by the website owner, who is a very busy person, with employment and advanced schooling.

Here is the current quandary, however. I have been contacted by JB, who advises that, due to the constraints of his life, he will no longer be able to update and maintain his Northampton website and has advised that he may soon delete the website entirely. It would seriously be a significant loss of the extensive info and details that he has already accumulated on the website.

I, myself, could go through his pages and edit them for proper grammer and presentation, as well as, somehow, transferring the info to a new and expanded historical section for the Northampton article on Wikipedia, although such would be a major undertaking for this new Wikipedia user. Plus, I don't know how to transfer such detailed text and images and formatting, from another person's website, onto the main Wikipedia article, along with the obviously necessary links to all of the major industrial articles relevant thereto, which may or may not already exist on Wikipedia.

What might you suggest? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 56PackardExec (talk • contribs) 07:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

[edit]

Email

[edit]

Bibliomaniac, could you please check your email? I sent you one today. Thanks --Canyouhearmenow 22:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

[edit]

Can't find it

[edit]

Bibliomaniac15 Here is my new user stupid-question-of-the-day: Did you answer my question of 22 September, regarding Northampton? I can't find a reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 56PackardExec (talk • contribs) 23:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliomaniac15

I have responded to your reply to my question of 22 September, on my User Page 56PackardExec (talk) 02:21, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Template

[edit]

Heya I have created a new template for Pleurodiran Turtles: is a work in progress: Template:Pleurodira let me know what you think. Faendalimas (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Tastes Better with Bacon - peer review

[edit]

Hiya, you specified an interest in articles about food at the volunteers list for peer reviewing - I was wondering if you might mind having a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive1? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review has been archived. -- Cirt (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Trading card game

[edit]

We're wrapping up the democratic rules approval process. Please reveiw Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 1:Rules/Rules approval‎ and review the ruleset. If no changes are made to it within 7 days, then we will proceed next week with the card nomination and approval process.

If you are no longer interested in helping out with the project, please remove your name from the participants list.

Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

[edit]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Bibliomaniac15. You have new messages at Oore's talk page.
Message added 21:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Peer review - Bacon: A Love Story

[edit]

I have placed this article up for peer review, now ongoing at Wikipedia:Peer review/Bacon: A Love Story/archive1. Input about the article and suggestions on how to improve its quality on the eventual road to FAC, would be most appreciated. -- Cirt (talk) 21:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure

[edit]

You are invited to participate in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in the 2009 AC RfC, and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Wikipedia. Ncmvocalist (talk) 26 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]

Closing statement

[edit]

Well done, if I say so myself. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for adminship/Ling.Nut

[edit]

I have just read your closing statement at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ling.Nut, and I should like to say I thought you did a really excellent job of weighing and summarising a long and complex discussion. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trout!

[edit]

Since you asked for it…

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

…Enjoy! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 352° 16' 15" NET 23:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?

[edit]

Why have you deleted User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day!? Rlevse took this initiative over from User:Phaedreal, and it may be that someone else might take it on. It's a rare example of appreciation being given here, perhaps. Rodhullandemu 01:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, up to 365 committed editors suddenly have redlinks on their user pages. Was that your intention? Rodhullandemu 01:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the absence of a timely response, I've restored these pages out of respected for the multiple editors who have been honoured, however trivial you may consider that to be; speedy deletion requires strong justification, not unilateral action. However, if you have evidence that User:Rlevse desired his work to be trashed, please feel free to let me know. Regards. Rodhullandemu 01:46, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rodhullandemu, if you look at Bibliomaniac15's logs for today, you'll see that within a few minutes he deleted dozens of pages in Rlevse's userspace, by Rlevse's request. The obvious conclusion is that this page was among them, not because Rlevse wanted this particular page to be "trashed," but as part of requesting deletion of his whole userspace as part of his retirement from the project. In this context, I find the tone of your comments toward Bibliomaniac15 unhelpful. Also completely unhelpful is the implication that Bibliomaniac15 failed to respond in a timely fashion, given that only 35 minutes had elapsed since your first post here and that Bibliomaniac15 has not edited in a few hours.

Despite all of that, I understand your desire to save that particular page, and perhaps a way can be worked out to do so. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The pages were deleted without edit summaries. Even a link would have helped, since I am not psychic, and neither are editors who have that userbox on their pages. However, I have reverted the two particular pages that impinge on multiple other users, on the principle of "least surprise". I am an admin and somewhat savvy, perhaps, but the outfall of other users suddenly finding their user pages borked for no apparent reason seems to me to be unnecessary in the circumstances. What if you'd come back after a break, as a major editor, but not an Admin; you would be confused, disappointed and perhaps angry. That's why an edit summary might have helped. Sorry if I appear to exhibit too much concern for other users; I know it's rare, but it happens from time to time. Rodhullandemu 02:02, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching

[edit]

Hi Bibliomaniac15, I noticed you've no longer got a coachee, would you consider taking me on as a coachee? Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:18pm • 11:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Rlevse

[edit]

Thank you! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for hosting the archive of "Today's Wikipedian". I linked it to my user page, now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Thread

[edit]

Your actions need explaining here [1]  Giacomo  18:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what actions I have to explain. Was there anything I did that was out of line? bibliomaniac15 00:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]

A case of evision Deletion where you seem to have idden too much

[edit]

I see that when you hid this log entry, you hid the name of the user who did it (you) and the reason. I see no reason why either of these needs to be hidden - only the original name of the user, along with what the software requires you to hide with it, needs to be. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution team

[edit]

Greetings! Please excuse this intrusion on your talk page, and allow me to invite you to participate in the newly-formed Wikipedia Contribution Team (WP:CONTRIB for short)! The goal of the team is to attract more and better contributions to the English Wikipedia, as well as to help support the fundraising team in our financial and editing contribution goals. We have lots of stuff to work on, from minor and major page building, to WikiProject outreach, article improvement, donor relations, and more—in fact, part of our mission is to empower team members to make their own projects to support our mission. Some of our projects only take a few minutes to work on, while others can be large, multi-person tasks—whatever your interest level, we're glad to have you.

If this sounds interesting, please visit WP:CONTRIB and sign onto the team. Even if there does not appear to be anything that really speaks out as being work you'd like to do, I'd encourage you to join and follow the project anyway, as the type of work we'll be doing will certainly evolve and change over time. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me, or ask on the team talk page. Regards, ⇒DanRosenthal Wikipedia Contribution Team 22:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this is a human edit (not a bot). I'm specifically contacting you as you expressed interest in the Campus Ambassador position, and the Wikipedia Contributions Team has a lot of commonality in working along with the Campus Ambassadors. You can reach me on my talk page, or by email at drosenthal@wikimedia.org with questions; I can't guarantee that I'll be checking back on your talk page often enough to hold a sustained conversation there. Regards, ⇒DanRosenthal Wikipedia Contribution Team 22:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My humble thanks.

[edit]

I would like to thank you for declaring me an awesome wikipedian and giving me my own day. Means a lot to know others appreciate and acknowledge the work that I put in. Keep up the fantastic work and I look forward to working with you around the wiki. Once again Thanks, Kind regards ZooPro 08:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]

Unified login

[edit]

Hi, I hope this is the right place to ask for this. I would like to usurp the account Ulis. Someone else seems to have created an account with that name on en.wikipedia but has no edits. My original account is http://de.wiki.x.io/wiki/Benutzer:Ulis . Thanks for your help, Ulis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.247.161.237 (talk) 23:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

[edit]

Latsabidze Giorgi

[edit]

Dear Bibliomaniac15, Please have a look my article when you grab a chance here I would like to ask you a question and I would appreciate if you could help me. According to some researches I have done I would like to add some quotations cited by some critics and published in some newspapers. Here is example what I would like to include in the article : He mesmerized concertgoers and critics, who have praised “Sheer poetry and art of the highest order” (Berliner Zeitung, Germany); “Today’s piano playing at its very best” (Salzburger Nachrichten, Austria), “One of the world-class virtuosi of the 21st century” (Le Monde, Paris). Well I might change the opening sentence where i mentioned words: "mesmerized critics..praised" - I think putting this in wiki would be a problem? Please let me know what is your suggestion. I can reference this reviews. I need to know some opinions from other users what they think about putting these sentences in article. I just wanna make sure it will not be a subject of removal, however if that contradicts notability of this article I will consider not putting in it. Thank you! Regards Sausa 07:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sausa11 (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jerem43 2

[edit]

Hi Bibliomaniac. You'll probably come across some comments I have been making around the site about this RfA. I just want to assure you that there is absolutely nothing personal whatsover in those remarks or about the way it was closed. It's the system and the corrupt voting that I criticize. I'm fully aware that the closing bureaucrats don't have much say in the matter. --Kudpung (talk) 07:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]

Reconfirmation diff to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe

[edit]

Hello. This is a message to inform you that your name has been removed from from the list of Wikipedia Signpost subscribers. Do not worry; this is simply a method of reforming the Signpost so that automated bots do not fill up retired users' talk pages with Signpost subscriptions (see discussion here) and to make life easier for the Signpost. If you wish to re-receive subscriptions, please send a reconfirmation edit to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe by signing with

  1. MessageDeliveryBot [you can also use a user talk subpage (like
  2. MessageDeliveryBot, replacing SUBPAGE with the subpage for the delivery), but this won't trigger your "New messages" bar.] Thank you for understanding.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of TeleComNasSprVen (talk) at 05:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Any evidence?

[edit]

Can you provide any evidence for your edit summary here? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:31, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CHU/S Concern

[edit]

Hi Bib, I was just perusing the CHU/S page and noticed something odd: the 2 requests "Geoffrey.M.Gleadall → Brigantianos" and "G.M.Gladehall → Coccionos" sure appear to be the same user, and both accounts have been editing recently. (Additionally, Coccionos talk page doesn't look promising...). Perhaps a word about the proper use of multiple accounts may be in order? Just thought I'd bring it up. ArakunemTalk 17:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mahlon Blaine page and copyright?

[edit]

Can you suggest how I can put the list of works in that is not a copyright violation. It is a list. A list, in and of itself, is not copyright protected. See Feist v Rural Telephone. If someone has once put up a list of the illustrated works of this author, if I type in the same list, how can they not be the same list. And once someone types in that list, nobody else can ever produce the same list?

Really, do you have a suggestion? Is the information just gone? Nobody can ever type in the list of books illustrated by this artist again?

RayKiddy (talk) 05:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching

[edit]

G'day Bibliomaniac15, On a recent inquiry into admin coaching I came across your name on the list of coaches, I was wondering if you were still active in that area of work and if so would you be willing to take on a hopefull like myself ? Kind regards ZooPro 14:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. That would be great, I am willing to accept any assistance you may be able to provide. ZooPro 01:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

[edit]
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bibliomaniac15/Archive_16&oldid=1079000673"