User talk:Beerfinger

Welcome!

Hello, Beerfinger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --auburnpilot talk 23:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 22:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 23:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 23:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 23:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have provided no proof that the source has any bias. Your continued assertion that it does have bias is without base. The two IPs which you say agree with you both only have a single edit. To that talk page. Hence I believe they are in fact you, and I have filed an SPI to look into the matter. Just because you have two random IPs agree with you does not mean that you have consensus to do whatever the hell you want.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 23:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, that's absolutely ridiculous. Just because two people agree with me doesn't mean we're all the same person. If you want to look up my IP, it will always be one of the same two places: at work or at home.--Beerfinger (talk) 00:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When the edits the IPs make are the only edits they have ever made, and you come out of nowhere and agree with them, then yes, it does raise supsicions.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 01:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't really care what suspicions you have, you're wrong. What does that mean anyway that I "came out of nowhere"? Like I said, this is my first time editing anything on Wikipedia. Where was I supposed to come from? Anyone's first time could be described as "coming out of nowhere."--Beerfinger (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other thing is, I didn't even know how this works well enough to know that I even needed people to agree with me, so what motivation would I have to do what you're accusing me of?--Beerfinger (talk) 01:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 01:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've contacted Kralizec! and asked for this block to be reversed. Please be patient. --auburnpilot talk 01:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Block reversed as per the request from AuburnPilot. Please make good use of this assumption of good faith. Thank you, — Kralizec! (talk) 01:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, AuburnPilot. And thank you Kralizec!--Beerfinger (talk) 02:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I still seem to be blocked.--Beerfinger (talk) 02:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration‎

Hi, Beerfinger. Please be aware that Wikipedia has a policy prohibiting any one editor from repeating the same edit more than three times in a 24 hour period; we call it the three revert rule. Instead of edit warring, continue with the discussion you started on the talk page and attempt to reach a compromise. Thanks, --auburnpilot talk 23:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your patience with me auburnpilot. I assure you my intentions are entirely impartial and am happy to discuss it with anyone who disagrees.--Beerfinger (talk) 23:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1407518 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.