User talk:Bad News Live 1982-87

Welcome

Hello, Bad News Live 1982-87! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Rosiestep (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Pit bull redirect

Please do not redirect this page again. The Pit Bull article is concerned with the common public usage of the phrase"Pit Bull" not the precise definition of "American Pit Bull Terrier" (which you'll see is stated in the lead). Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 14:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

*I didn't know what article we are talking about. Is it the Iron Maiden article?

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Queen (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 14:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

62.16.168.57, February 2009

Hey guys! Sheer Heart Attack isn't heavy metal or hard rock. It's classic rock, folk rock, pop and rock and roll.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bad_News_Live_1982-87.

Pit bull redirect

Please do not redirect this page again. The Pit Bull article is concerned with the common public usage of the phrase"Pit Bull" not the precise definition of "American Pit Bull Terrier" (which you'll see is stated in the lead). Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

62.16.168.57, February 2009

Hey guys! Sheer Heart Attack isn't heavy metal or hard rock. It's classic rock, folk rock, pop and rock and roll.

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. :::Do not add classic rock to anymore genre fields. The genre field is for genres only. Classic rock is NOT a genre it is a radio format. The field is not intended for radio formats, only genres. Do not tamper with anymore articles in this manner or you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wether B (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pink Floyd bootlegs

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pink Floyd bootlegs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced, unverifiable, non-notable list

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tomasz. 19:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Dark Side of the Moon. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 19:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ummagumma. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 19:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Staffwaterboy. Marek.69 ^talk 19:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Day at the Park

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Day at the Park, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable bootleg tape. I can find no sources to back up anything in this article; this search is particularly telling.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Reyk _YO! 23:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of British Winter Tour '74

I have nominated British Winter Tour '74, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Winter Tour '74. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 21:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Obscured By Clouds Tour

I have nominated Obscured By Clouds Tour, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obscured By Clouds Tour. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 21:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Pink Floyd: British Winter Tour '74 1974. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 14:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article rename

You renamed Eclipse (song) to Eclipse (Pink Floyd song). This should be done if there is another song with the same name, but I don't see one on the disambiguation page, Eclipse (disambiguation), and your edit summary suggests this was not the reason for the move. Also, when you change a page name, you should find all pages which link to it, and change the link to avoid a redirect. Do you intend to do this? If not, or if there is not a need for this rename, it should be changed back. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 01:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Killesberg Tapes

I have nominated Killesberg Tapes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killesberg Tapes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 21:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Your move of Claude Monet is vandalism.[1] If you do this again, you'll be blocked. Ty 13:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Divided We Fall (album)

The article Divided We Fall (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]