If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Roleplayer (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid that a google search for the name of the website you created an article about returns just one hit, and that's Wikipedia. If you recreate the article after it is deleted, it will likely just be deleted again, unless you are able to show a very good verifiable reference that proves its notability. -- Roleplayer (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The website was shut down and is under going for major reconstruction in march. it won't be up and running again until this summer. The creator is currently working to reconstruct the site. That was the last thing that was added to the site before they shut it down.--BJ08 (talk) 23:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Tommy and All requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
Hello, BJ08, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 23:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated this article for speedy deletion because it doesn't seem to fit the notability requirements for web content (available at WP:WEB). You say the webcomic could win a local emmy. If it has been nominated for one, you should include that in the article as well as a reference which verifies the claim, otherwise "could win a local emmy" doesn't mean much of anything. If notable people have talked about it, you should name those people and include references which verify what they said; just listing a quote and saying it was said by "a critic" doesn't do anything for notability at all. Finally, I can't find much information about Tommy and All via Google. I think if it were actually note-worthy, other people would be talking about it as well and that doesn't seem to be the case. The number of hits I get for a Google search of Happy Tree Friends is more than 50,000. For Tommy and All, I get one and it's the page on Wikipedia. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The site has been taken off of google comepletely.they are redoing the site. also, i said could be nominated because i remember hearing about the Tommy and all animated cartoon being nominated for a local emmy and some other award but i wasn't 100% sure about it. also the critic was for the website Newgrounds. also i have not added all the notable praise it has gotten it is still in development.--BJ08 (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Google wouldn't remove other websites discussing the webcomic just because the webcomic's site was down, and that's a big part of establishing notability. Doing a search for "local Emmy" and "Tommy and All" returns 0 hits, so I'd say it probably wasn't nominated, but if you can find proof that it was, that would be a big step to establishing notability. Good luck. Rnb (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe Google would remove content for sites that had nothing to do with the requestor, but I'm not going to argue. Until the page establishes notability, some editor on Wikipedia will rightfully delete it. Rnb (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The creators most likely requested that the site be taken off. i also think Tommy and All lost nomination for local emmy and is their any other way to prove notability besides awards?--
Hi, I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. It has been protected against recreation because it was deleted three times, so if you think you can reference the article, write it here and let me or another admin know Jimfbleak (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
